That special someone: When the board views its chair as a resource

Ryan Krause, Matthew Semadeni, Michael C. Withers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research summary: Many boards view their chairs as valuable resources. We predict that whether a board adopts such a view depends on the board chair's human and social capital. Data from S&P 500 firms suggest that while a board chair's human capital increases the probability that the board views him or her as a resource, social capital has no overall effect. In a post-hoc investigation, however, we find the board chair's independence to be an important boundary condition for the effect of social capital. With this exploratory research, we aim to spur research devoted specifically to board chairs. Such research will become increasingly important over time as firms continue to separate their CEO and board chair positions. Managerial summary: The purpose of this research was to determine the factors that lead a board of directors to view its chair as a valuable resource. We expected that board chairs with high human and social capital would be more likely to be viewed as a resource by their colleagues. Surprisingly, only human capital exhibited such an effect overall. Social capital increases the likelihood a chair is viewed as a resource when the chair is independent, but actually decreases the likelihood a chair is viewed as a resource when the chair is either the current or former CEO. These results suggest that boards generally value human capital in their chairs, but view social capital through a somewhat more complex lens. We explore the possible implications of these findings in the article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalStrategic Management Journal
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2015

Fingerprint

Resources
Social capital
Human capital
Human and social capital
Chief executive officer
Board independence
Factors
Boundary conditions
Board of directors

Keywords

  • Board chairs
  • Human capital
  • Resource-based view
  • Social capital
  • Strategic leadership

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

That special someone : When the board views its chair as a resource. / Krause, Ryan; Semadeni, Matthew; Withers, Michael C.

In: Strategic Management Journal, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{00d717bef1f14f23b509ea8f62bcfd71,
title = "That special someone: When the board views its chair as a resource",
abstract = "Research summary: Many boards view their chairs as valuable resources. We predict that whether a board adopts such a view depends on the board chair's human and social capital. Data from S&P 500 firms suggest that while a board chair's human capital increases the probability that the board views him or her as a resource, social capital has no overall effect. In a post-hoc investigation, however, we find the board chair's independence to be an important boundary condition for the effect of social capital. With this exploratory research, we aim to spur research devoted specifically to board chairs. Such research will become increasingly important over time as firms continue to separate their CEO and board chair positions. Managerial summary: The purpose of this research was to determine the factors that lead a board of directors to view its chair as a valuable resource. We expected that board chairs with high human and social capital would be more likely to be viewed as a resource by their colleagues. Surprisingly, only human capital exhibited such an effect overall. Social capital increases the likelihood a chair is viewed as a resource when the chair is independent, but actually decreases the likelihood a chair is viewed as a resource when the chair is either the current or former CEO. These results suggest that boards generally value human capital in their chairs, but view social capital through a somewhat more complex lens. We explore the possible implications of these findings in the article.",
keywords = "Board chairs, Human capital, Resource-based view, Social capital, Strategic leadership",
author = "Ryan Krause and Matthew Semadeni and Withers, {Michael C.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1002/smj.2444",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - That special someone

T2 - When the board views its chair as a resource

AU - Krause, Ryan

AU - Semadeni, Matthew

AU - Withers, Michael C.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Research summary: Many boards view their chairs as valuable resources. We predict that whether a board adopts such a view depends on the board chair's human and social capital. Data from S&P 500 firms suggest that while a board chair's human capital increases the probability that the board views him or her as a resource, social capital has no overall effect. In a post-hoc investigation, however, we find the board chair's independence to be an important boundary condition for the effect of social capital. With this exploratory research, we aim to spur research devoted specifically to board chairs. Such research will become increasingly important over time as firms continue to separate their CEO and board chair positions. Managerial summary: The purpose of this research was to determine the factors that lead a board of directors to view its chair as a valuable resource. We expected that board chairs with high human and social capital would be more likely to be viewed as a resource by their colleagues. Surprisingly, only human capital exhibited such an effect overall. Social capital increases the likelihood a chair is viewed as a resource when the chair is independent, but actually decreases the likelihood a chair is viewed as a resource when the chair is either the current or former CEO. These results suggest that boards generally value human capital in their chairs, but view social capital through a somewhat more complex lens. We explore the possible implications of these findings in the article.

AB - Research summary: Many boards view their chairs as valuable resources. We predict that whether a board adopts such a view depends on the board chair's human and social capital. Data from S&P 500 firms suggest that while a board chair's human capital increases the probability that the board views him or her as a resource, social capital has no overall effect. In a post-hoc investigation, however, we find the board chair's independence to be an important boundary condition for the effect of social capital. With this exploratory research, we aim to spur research devoted specifically to board chairs. Such research will become increasingly important over time as firms continue to separate their CEO and board chair positions. Managerial summary: The purpose of this research was to determine the factors that lead a board of directors to view its chair as a valuable resource. We expected that board chairs with high human and social capital would be more likely to be viewed as a resource by their colleagues. Surprisingly, only human capital exhibited such an effect overall. Social capital increases the likelihood a chair is viewed as a resource when the chair is independent, but actually decreases the likelihood a chair is viewed as a resource when the chair is either the current or former CEO. These results suggest that boards generally value human capital in their chairs, but view social capital through a somewhat more complex lens. We explore the possible implications of these findings in the article.

KW - Board chairs

KW - Human capital

KW - Resource-based view

KW - Social capital

KW - Strategic leadership

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947731362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947731362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/smj.2444

DO - 10.1002/smj.2444

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947731362

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

ER -