That noun phrase may be beneficial and this may not be: discourse cohesion in reading and writing

Scott A. Crossley, Dani Francuz Rose, Cassondra Danekes, Charles Wesley Rose, Danielle McNamara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of attended and unattended demonstratives on text processing, comprehension, and writing quality in two studies. In the first study, participants (n = 45) read 64 mini-stories in a self-paced reading task and identified the main referent in the clauses. The sentences varied in the type of demonstratives (i.e., this, that, these, and those) contained in the sentences and whether the referent was followed by a demonstrative determiner and noun (i.e., an attended demonstrative) or a demonstrative pronoun (i.e., an unattended demonstrative). In the second study, 173 persuasive essays written by high school students were rated by expert judges on overall writing quality using a standardized rubric. Expert coders manually counted the number and types of demonstratives (attended and unattended demonstratives) in each essay. These counts were used to predict the human scores of essay quality. The findings demonstrate that the use of unattended demonstratives as anaphoric references is disadvantageous to both reading time and referent identification. However, these disadvantages become advantages in terms of essay quality likely because linguistic complexity is a strong indicator of high proficiency writing. From a text processing and comprehension viewpoint, the findings indicate, then, that anaphoric reference is not always beneficial and does not always create a more cohesive text. In contrast, from a writing context, the use of unattended demonstratives leads to a more linguistically complex text, which generally equates to a higher quality text.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalReading and Writing
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 15 2016

Fingerprint

Reading
discourse
text processing
comprehension
expert
Linguistics
Students
linguistics
school
student

Keywords

  • Attended demonstratives
  • Discourse cohesion
  • Essay quality
  • Text comprehension
  • Text processing
  • Unattended demonstratives

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

That noun phrase may be beneficial and this may not be : discourse cohesion in reading and writing. / Crossley, Scott A.; Rose, Dani Francuz; Danekes, Cassondra; Rose, Charles Wesley; McNamara, Danielle.

In: Reading and Writing, 15.09.2016, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Crossley, Scott A. ; Rose, Dani Francuz ; Danekes, Cassondra ; Rose, Charles Wesley ; McNamara, Danielle. / That noun phrase may be beneficial and this may not be : discourse cohesion in reading and writing. In: Reading and Writing. 2016 ; pp. 1-21.
@article{de59ba4ed30d4f8a86119a9234124930,
title = "That noun phrase may be beneficial and this may not be: discourse cohesion in reading and writing",
abstract = "This paper examines the effects of attended and unattended demonstratives on text processing, comprehension, and writing quality in two studies. In the first study, participants (n = 45) read 64 mini-stories in a self-paced reading task and identified the main referent in the clauses. The sentences varied in the type of demonstratives (i.e., this, that, these, and those) contained in the sentences and whether the referent was followed by a demonstrative determiner and noun (i.e., an attended demonstrative) or a demonstrative pronoun (i.e., an unattended demonstrative). In the second study, 173 persuasive essays written by high school students were rated by expert judges on overall writing quality using a standardized rubric. Expert coders manually counted the number and types of demonstratives (attended and unattended demonstratives) in each essay. These counts were used to predict the human scores of essay quality. The findings demonstrate that the use of unattended demonstratives as anaphoric references is disadvantageous to both reading time and referent identification. However, these disadvantages become advantages in terms of essay quality likely because linguistic complexity is a strong indicator of high proficiency writing. From a text processing and comprehension viewpoint, the findings indicate, then, that anaphoric reference is not always beneficial and does not always create a more cohesive text. In contrast, from a writing context, the use of unattended demonstratives leads to a more linguistically complex text, which generally equates to a higher quality text.",
keywords = "Attended demonstratives, Discourse cohesion, Essay quality, Text comprehension, Text processing, Unattended demonstratives",
author = "Crossley, {Scott A.} and Rose, {Dani Francuz} and Cassondra Danekes and Rose, {Charles Wesley} and Danielle McNamara",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s11145-016-9690-4",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Reading and Writing",
issn = "0922-4777",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - That noun phrase may be beneficial and this may not be

T2 - discourse cohesion in reading and writing

AU - Crossley, Scott A.

AU - Rose, Dani Francuz

AU - Danekes, Cassondra

AU - Rose, Charles Wesley

AU - McNamara, Danielle

PY - 2016/9/15

Y1 - 2016/9/15

N2 - This paper examines the effects of attended and unattended demonstratives on text processing, comprehension, and writing quality in two studies. In the first study, participants (n = 45) read 64 mini-stories in a self-paced reading task and identified the main referent in the clauses. The sentences varied in the type of demonstratives (i.e., this, that, these, and those) contained in the sentences and whether the referent was followed by a demonstrative determiner and noun (i.e., an attended demonstrative) or a demonstrative pronoun (i.e., an unattended demonstrative). In the second study, 173 persuasive essays written by high school students were rated by expert judges on overall writing quality using a standardized rubric. Expert coders manually counted the number and types of demonstratives (attended and unattended demonstratives) in each essay. These counts were used to predict the human scores of essay quality. The findings demonstrate that the use of unattended demonstratives as anaphoric references is disadvantageous to both reading time and referent identification. However, these disadvantages become advantages in terms of essay quality likely because linguistic complexity is a strong indicator of high proficiency writing. From a text processing and comprehension viewpoint, the findings indicate, then, that anaphoric reference is not always beneficial and does not always create a more cohesive text. In contrast, from a writing context, the use of unattended demonstratives leads to a more linguistically complex text, which generally equates to a higher quality text.

AB - This paper examines the effects of attended and unattended demonstratives on text processing, comprehension, and writing quality in two studies. In the first study, participants (n = 45) read 64 mini-stories in a self-paced reading task and identified the main referent in the clauses. The sentences varied in the type of demonstratives (i.e., this, that, these, and those) contained in the sentences and whether the referent was followed by a demonstrative determiner and noun (i.e., an attended demonstrative) or a demonstrative pronoun (i.e., an unattended demonstrative). In the second study, 173 persuasive essays written by high school students were rated by expert judges on overall writing quality using a standardized rubric. Expert coders manually counted the number and types of demonstratives (attended and unattended demonstratives) in each essay. These counts were used to predict the human scores of essay quality. The findings demonstrate that the use of unattended demonstratives as anaphoric references is disadvantageous to both reading time and referent identification. However, these disadvantages become advantages in terms of essay quality likely because linguistic complexity is a strong indicator of high proficiency writing. From a text processing and comprehension viewpoint, the findings indicate, then, that anaphoric reference is not always beneficial and does not always create a more cohesive text. In contrast, from a writing context, the use of unattended demonstratives leads to a more linguistically complex text, which generally equates to a higher quality text.

KW - Attended demonstratives

KW - Discourse cohesion

KW - Essay quality

KW - Text comprehension

KW - Text processing

KW - Unattended demonstratives

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988345917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988345917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11145-016-9690-4

DO - 10.1007/s11145-016-9690-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988345917

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Reading and Writing

JF - Reading and Writing

SN - 0922-4777

ER -