Testing for the Motivation Impairment Effect during Deceptive and Truthful Interaction

Judee K. Burgoon, Kory Floyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to the motivation impairment effect (MIE) hypothesis, deceivers who are highly motivated to succeed should suffer detrimental effects on nonverbal performance but facilitative effects on verbal performance relative to deceivers who are less motivated. This should make highly motivated deceivers' lies more detectable when receivers have access to nonverbal channels. Burgoon (1998) articulated a number of problems with the reasoning underlying the motivation impairment hypothesis and with the data used to support it. Drawing on a more recent theory of interpersonal deception, the current investigation challenges the MIE hypothesis by advancing the alternative predictions that (a) motivation often enhances both verbal and nonverbal performance and (b) does so irrespective of whether deception or truthtelling is occurring. Results from multiple operationalizations of motivation and performance support these predictions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-267
Number of pages25
JournalWestern Journal of Communication
Volume64
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2000

Fingerprint

Testing
interaction
performance
operationalization
recipient
Impairment
Interaction
Prediction
Deception
Operationalization
Truth-telling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Testing for the Motivation Impairment Effect during Deceptive and Truthful Interaction. / Burgoon, Judee K.; Floyd, Kory.

In: Western Journal of Communication, Vol. 64, No. 3, 06.2000, p. 243-267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{af175d2e194245b997286f8b7ef9c050,
title = "Testing for the Motivation Impairment Effect during Deceptive and Truthful Interaction",
abstract = "According to the motivation impairment effect (MIE) hypothesis, deceivers who are highly motivated to succeed should suffer detrimental effects on nonverbal performance but facilitative effects on verbal performance relative to deceivers who are less motivated. This should make highly motivated deceivers' lies more detectable when receivers have access to nonverbal channels. Burgoon (1998) articulated a number of problems with the reasoning underlying the motivation impairment hypothesis and with the data used to support it. Drawing on a more recent theory of interpersonal deception, the current investigation challenges the MIE hypothesis by advancing the alternative predictions that (a) motivation often enhances both verbal and nonverbal performance and (b) does so irrespective of whether deception or truthtelling is occurring. Results from multiple operationalizations of motivation and performance support these predictions.",
author = "Burgoon, {Judee K.} and Kory Floyd",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "243--267",
journal = "Western Journal of Communication",
issn = "1057-0314",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing for the Motivation Impairment Effect during Deceptive and Truthful Interaction

AU - Burgoon, Judee K.

AU - Floyd, Kory

PY - 2000/6

Y1 - 2000/6

N2 - According to the motivation impairment effect (MIE) hypothesis, deceivers who are highly motivated to succeed should suffer detrimental effects on nonverbal performance but facilitative effects on verbal performance relative to deceivers who are less motivated. This should make highly motivated deceivers' lies more detectable when receivers have access to nonverbal channels. Burgoon (1998) articulated a number of problems with the reasoning underlying the motivation impairment hypothesis and with the data used to support it. Drawing on a more recent theory of interpersonal deception, the current investigation challenges the MIE hypothesis by advancing the alternative predictions that (a) motivation often enhances both verbal and nonverbal performance and (b) does so irrespective of whether deception or truthtelling is occurring. Results from multiple operationalizations of motivation and performance support these predictions.

AB - According to the motivation impairment effect (MIE) hypothesis, deceivers who are highly motivated to succeed should suffer detrimental effects on nonverbal performance but facilitative effects on verbal performance relative to deceivers who are less motivated. This should make highly motivated deceivers' lies more detectable when receivers have access to nonverbal channels. Burgoon (1998) articulated a number of problems with the reasoning underlying the motivation impairment hypothesis and with the data used to support it. Drawing on a more recent theory of interpersonal deception, the current investigation challenges the MIE hypothesis by advancing the alternative predictions that (a) motivation often enhances both verbal and nonverbal performance and (b) does so irrespective of whether deception or truthtelling is occurring. Results from multiple operationalizations of motivation and performance support these predictions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034358235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034358235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 243

EP - 267

JO - Western Journal of Communication

JF - Western Journal of Communication

SN - 1057-0314

IS - 3

ER -