Territorial revision and state repression

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Does involvement in territorial conflict affect domestic repression? I argue that seeking to revise territory abroad will affect domestic repression, but conditionally on regime type and conflict severity. For democracies, there may be public pressure to deliver the good of territory. Because of this, territorial revision can lead to in-group/out-group dynamics at home, making it politically beneficial to increase repression domestically against groups seen as being opposed to the conflict. Autocracies may place a different value on contested territory, as they rely on the distribution of private goods to maintain support. While in-group/out-group dynamics may also be in play for autocracies, such states also face different types of constraints than democracies. Autocracies are more likely to use their military for domestic repression, and thus are more likely to simply maintain or reduce repression because the military is now being used abroad. These propositions are tested cross-nationally by examining repression when states are revisionists in conflicts over territory spanning from 1977 to 2001. The results of ordered logit analyses of state repression show that democratic states become more likely to increase repression when they are territorial revisionists, as those conflict-years become more deadly, while autocratic states are less likely to increase repression during the same periods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-387
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Peace Research
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

repression
group dynamics
outgroup
Military
democracy
Group
regime

Keywords

  • human rights abuse
  • militarized interstate disputes
  • repression
  • territorial conflict

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Safety Research

Cite this

Territorial revision and state repression. / Wright, Thorin.

In: Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2014, p. 375-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2c3d5822ae21436981cf6c8385ccf509,
title = "Territorial revision and state repression",
abstract = "Does involvement in territorial conflict affect domestic repression? I argue that seeking to revise territory abroad will affect domestic repression, but conditionally on regime type and conflict severity. For democracies, there may be public pressure to deliver the good of territory. Because of this, territorial revision can lead to in-group/out-group dynamics at home, making it politically beneficial to increase repression domestically against groups seen as being opposed to the conflict. Autocracies may place a different value on contested territory, as they rely on the distribution of private goods to maintain support. While in-group/out-group dynamics may also be in play for autocracies, such states also face different types of constraints than democracies. Autocracies are more likely to use their military for domestic repression, and thus are more likely to simply maintain or reduce repression because the military is now being used abroad. These propositions are tested cross-nationally by examining repression when states are revisionists in conflicts over territory spanning from 1977 to 2001. The results of ordered logit analyses of state repression show that democratic states become more likely to increase repression when they are territorial revisionists, as those conflict-years become more deadly, while autocratic states are less likely to increase repression during the same periods.",
keywords = "human rights abuse, militarized interstate disputes, repression, territorial conflict",
author = "Thorin Wright",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0022343314520822",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "375--387",
journal = "Journal of Peace Research",
issn = "0022-3433",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Territorial revision and state repression

AU - Wright, Thorin

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Does involvement in territorial conflict affect domestic repression? I argue that seeking to revise territory abroad will affect domestic repression, but conditionally on regime type and conflict severity. For democracies, there may be public pressure to deliver the good of territory. Because of this, territorial revision can lead to in-group/out-group dynamics at home, making it politically beneficial to increase repression domestically against groups seen as being opposed to the conflict. Autocracies may place a different value on contested territory, as they rely on the distribution of private goods to maintain support. While in-group/out-group dynamics may also be in play for autocracies, such states also face different types of constraints than democracies. Autocracies are more likely to use their military for domestic repression, and thus are more likely to simply maintain or reduce repression because the military is now being used abroad. These propositions are tested cross-nationally by examining repression when states are revisionists in conflicts over territory spanning from 1977 to 2001. The results of ordered logit analyses of state repression show that democratic states become more likely to increase repression when they are territorial revisionists, as those conflict-years become more deadly, while autocratic states are less likely to increase repression during the same periods.

AB - Does involvement in territorial conflict affect domestic repression? I argue that seeking to revise territory abroad will affect domestic repression, but conditionally on regime type and conflict severity. For democracies, there may be public pressure to deliver the good of territory. Because of this, territorial revision can lead to in-group/out-group dynamics at home, making it politically beneficial to increase repression domestically against groups seen as being opposed to the conflict. Autocracies may place a different value on contested territory, as they rely on the distribution of private goods to maintain support. While in-group/out-group dynamics may also be in play for autocracies, such states also face different types of constraints than democracies. Autocracies are more likely to use their military for domestic repression, and thus are more likely to simply maintain or reduce repression because the military is now being used abroad. These propositions are tested cross-nationally by examining repression when states are revisionists in conflicts over territory spanning from 1977 to 2001. The results of ordered logit analyses of state repression show that democratic states become more likely to increase repression when they are territorial revisionists, as those conflict-years become more deadly, while autocratic states are less likely to increase repression during the same periods.

KW - human rights abuse

KW - militarized interstate disputes

KW - repression

KW - territorial conflict

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899928264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899928264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022343314520822

DO - 10.1177/0022343314520822

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84899928264

VL - 51

SP - 375

EP - 387

JO - Journal of Peace Research

JF - Journal of Peace Research

SN - 0022-3433

IS - 3

ER -