Tectonics of the Himalaya and Southern Tibet from two perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

838 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Himalaya and Tibet provide an unparalleled opportunity to examine the complex ways in which continents respond to collisional orogenesis. This paper is an attempt to synthesize the known geology of this orogenic system, with special attention paid to the tectonic evolution of the Himalaya and southernmost Tibet since India-Eurasia collision at ca. 50 Ma. Two alternative perspectives are developed. The first is largely historical. It includes brief (and necessarily subjective) reviews of the tectonic stratigraphy, the structural geology, and metamorphic geology of the Himalaya. The second focuses on the processes that dictate the behavior of the orogenic system today. It is argued that these processes have not changed substantially over the Miocene-Holocene interval, which suggests that the orogen has achieved a quasi-steady state. This condition implies a rough balance between plate-tectonic processes that lead to the accumulation of energy in the orogen and many other processes (e.g., erosion of the Himalayan front and the lateral flow of the middle and lower crust of Tibet) that lead to the dissipation of energy. The tectonics of the Himalaya and Tibet are thus intimately related; the Himalaya might have evolved very differently had the Tibetan Plateau never have formed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)324-350
Number of pages27
JournalBulletin of the Geological Society of America
Volume112
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

geology
tectonics
structural geology
plate tectonics
tectonic evolution
orogeny
lower crust
energy
dissipation
stratigraphy
collision
Miocene
Holocene
plateau
erosion
continent

Keywords

  • Asia
  • Himalaya
  • India
  • Mountain building
  • Orogenic belts
  • Tectonics
  • Tibet

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Tectonics of the Himalaya and Southern Tibet from two perspectives. / Hodges, Kip.

In: Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, Vol. 112, No. 3, 2000, p. 324-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{28477d83221440f4adc5ee5171e143f5,
title = "Tectonics of the Himalaya and Southern Tibet from two perspectives",
abstract = "The Himalaya and Tibet provide an unparalleled opportunity to examine the complex ways in which continents respond to collisional orogenesis. This paper is an attempt to synthesize the known geology of this orogenic system, with special attention paid to the tectonic evolution of the Himalaya and southernmost Tibet since India-Eurasia collision at ca. 50 Ma. Two alternative perspectives are developed. The first is largely historical. It includes brief (and necessarily subjective) reviews of the tectonic stratigraphy, the structural geology, and metamorphic geology of the Himalaya. The second focuses on the processes that dictate the behavior of the orogenic system today. It is argued that these processes have not changed substantially over the Miocene-Holocene interval, which suggests that the orogen has achieved a quasi-steady state. This condition implies a rough balance between plate-tectonic processes that lead to the accumulation of energy in the orogen and many other processes (e.g., erosion of the Himalayan front and the lateral flow of the middle and lower crust of Tibet) that lead to the dissipation of energy. The tectonics of the Himalaya and Tibet are thus intimately related; the Himalaya might have evolved very differently had the Tibetan Plateau never have formed.",
keywords = "Asia, Himalaya, India, Mountain building, Orogenic belts, Tectonics, Tibet",
author = "Kip Hodges",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<324:TOTHAS>2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "324--350",
journal = "Bulletin of the Geological Society of America",
issn = "0016-7606",
publisher = "Geological Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tectonics of the Himalaya and Southern Tibet from two perspectives

AU - Hodges, Kip

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The Himalaya and Tibet provide an unparalleled opportunity to examine the complex ways in which continents respond to collisional orogenesis. This paper is an attempt to synthesize the known geology of this orogenic system, with special attention paid to the tectonic evolution of the Himalaya and southernmost Tibet since India-Eurasia collision at ca. 50 Ma. Two alternative perspectives are developed. The first is largely historical. It includes brief (and necessarily subjective) reviews of the tectonic stratigraphy, the structural geology, and metamorphic geology of the Himalaya. The second focuses on the processes that dictate the behavior of the orogenic system today. It is argued that these processes have not changed substantially over the Miocene-Holocene interval, which suggests that the orogen has achieved a quasi-steady state. This condition implies a rough balance between plate-tectonic processes that lead to the accumulation of energy in the orogen and many other processes (e.g., erosion of the Himalayan front and the lateral flow of the middle and lower crust of Tibet) that lead to the dissipation of energy. The tectonics of the Himalaya and Tibet are thus intimately related; the Himalaya might have evolved very differently had the Tibetan Plateau never have formed.

AB - The Himalaya and Tibet provide an unparalleled opportunity to examine the complex ways in which continents respond to collisional orogenesis. This paper is an attempt to synthesize the known geology of this orogenic system, with special attention paid to the tectonic evolution of the Himalaya and southernmost Tibet since India-Eurasia collision at ca. 50 Ma. Two alternative perspectives are developed. The first is largely historical. It includes brief (and necessarily subjective) reviews of the tectonic stratigraphy, the structural geology, and metamorphic geology of the Himalaya. The second focuses on the processes that dictate the behavior of the orogenic system today. It is argued that these processes have not changed substantially over the Miocene-Holocene interval, which suggests that the orogen has achieved a quasi-steady state. This condition implies a rough balance between plate-tectonic processes that lead to the accumulation of energy in the orogen and many other processes (e.g., erosion of the Himalayan front and the lateral flow of the middle and lower crust of Tibet) that lead to the dissipation of energy. The tectonics of the Himalaya and Tibet are thus intimately related; the Himalaya might have evolved very differently had the Tibetan Plateau never have formed.

KW - Asia

KW - Himalaya

KW - India

KW - Mountain building

KW - Orogenic belts

KW - Tectonics

KW - Tibet

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879887668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879887668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<324:TOTHAS>2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<324:TOTHAS>2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 324

EP - 350

JO - Bulletin of the Geological Society of America

JF - Bulletin of the Geological Society of America

SN - 0016-7606

IS - 3

ER -