Tectonics from topography

Procedures, promise, and pitfalls

Cameron Wobus, Kelin Whipple, Eric Kirby, Noah Snyder, Joel Johnson, Katerina Spyropolou, Benjamin Crosby, Daniel Sheehan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

491 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Empirical observations from fluvial systems across the globe reveal a consistent power-law scaling between channel slope and contributing drainage area. Theoretical arguments for both detachment- and transport-limited erosion regimes suggest that rock uplift rate should exert first-order control on this scaling. Here we describe in detail a method for exploiting this relationship, in which topographic indices of longitudinal profile shape and character are derived from digital topographic data. The stream profile data can then be used to delineate breaks in scaling that may be associated with tectonic boundaries. The description of the method is followed by three case studies from varied tectonic settings. The case studies illustrate the power of stream profile analysis in delineating spatial patterns of, and in some cases, temporal changes in, rock uplift rate. Owing to an incomplete understanding of river response to rock uplift, the method remains primarily a qualitative tool for neotectonic investigations; we conclude with a discussion of research needs that must be met before we can extract quantitative information about tectonics directly from topography.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-74
Number of pages20
JournalSpecial Paper of the Geological Society of America
Volume398
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

uplift
topography
tectonics
rock
neotectonics
tectonic setting
power law
drainage
erosion
river
method
rate
need
index
analysis

Keywords

  • Channel geometry
  • Digital elevation models
  • Geomorphology
  • Neotectonics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology

Cite this

Tectonics from topography : Procedures, promise, and pitfalls. / Wobus, Cameron; Whipple, Kelin; Kirby, Eric; Snyder, Noah; Johnson, Joel; Spyropolou, Katerina; Crosby, Benjamin; Sheehan, Daniel.

In: Special Paper of the Geological Society of America, Vol. 398, 2006, p. 55-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wobus, C, Whipple, K, Kirby, E, Snyder, N, Johnson, J, Spyropolou, K, Crosby, B & Sheehan, D 2006, 'Tectonics from topography: Procedures, promise, and pitfalls', Special Paper of the Geological Society of America, vol. 398, pp. 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1130/2006.2398(04)
Wobus, Cameron ; Whipple, Kelin ; Kirby, Eric ; Snyder, Noah ; Johnson, Joel ; Spyropolou, Katerina ; Crosby, Benjamin ; Sheehan, Daniel. / Tectonics from topography : Procedures, promise, and pitfalls. In: Special Paper of the Geological Society of America. 2006 ; Vol. 398. pp. 55-74.
@article{537881b4434b47ff8ca0d6b779364581,
title = "Tectonics from topography: Procedures, promise, and pitfalls",
abstract = "Empirical observations from fluvial systems across the globe reveal a consistent power-law scaling between channel slope and contributing drainage area. Theoretical arguments for both detachment- and transport-limited erosion regimes suggest that rock uplift rate should exert first-order control on this scaling. Here we describe in detail a method for exploiting this relationship, in which topographic indices of longitudinal profile shape and character are derived from digital topographic data. The stream profile data can then be used to delineate breaks in scaling that may be associated with tectonic boundaries. The description of the method is followed by three case studies from varied tectonic settings. The case studies illustrate the power of stream profile analysis in delineating spatial patterns of, and in some cases, temporal changes in, rock uplift rate. Owing to an incomplete understanding of river response to rock uplift, the method remains primarily a qualitative tool for neotectonic investigations; we conclude with a discussion of research needs that must be met before we can extract quantitative information about tectonics directly from topography.",
keywords = "Channel geometry, Digital elevation models, Geomorphology, Neotectonics",
author = "Cameron Wobus and Kelin Whipple and Eric Kirby and Noah Snyder and Joel Johnson and Katerina Spyropolou and Benjamin Crosby and Daniel Sheehan",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1130/2006.2398(04)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "398",
pages = "55--74",
journal = "Special Paper of the Geological Society of America",
issn = "0072-1077",
publisher = "Geological Society of America",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tectonics from topography

T2 - Procedures, promise, and pitfalls

AU - Wobus, Cameron

AU - Whipple, Kelin

AU - Kirby, Eric

AU - Snyder, Noah

AU - Johnson, Joel

AU - Spyropolou, Katerina

AU - Crosby, Benjamin

AU - Sheehan, Daniel

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Empirical observations from fluvial systems across the globe reveal a consistent power-law scaling between channel slope and contributing drainage area. Theoretical arguments for both detachment- and transport-limited erosion regimes suggest that rock uplift rate should exert first-order control on this scaling. Here we describe in detail a method for exploiting this relationship, in which topographic indices of longitudinal profile shape and character are derived from digital topographic data. The stream profile data can then be used to delineate breaks in scaling that may be associated with tectonic boundaries. The description of the method is followed by three case studies from varied tectonic settings. The case studies illustrate the power of stream profile analysis in delineating spatial patterns of, and in some cases, temporal changes in, rock uplift rate. Owing to an incomplete understanding of river response to rock uplift, the method remains primarily a qualitative tool for neotectonic investigations; we conclude with a discussion of research needs that must be met before we can extract quantitative information about tectonics directly from topography.

AB - Empirical observations from fluvial systems across the globe reveal a consistent power-law scaling between channel slope and contributing drainage area. Theoretical arguments for both detachment- and transport-limited erosion regimes suggest that rock uplift rate should exert first-order control on this scaling. Here we describe in detail a method for exploiting this relationship, in which topographic indices of longitudinal profile shape and character are derived from digital topographic data. The stream profile data can then be used to delineate breaks in scaling that may be associated with tectonic boundaries. The description of the method is followed by three case studies from varied tectonic settings. The case studies illustrate the power of stream profile analysis in delineating spatial patterns of, and in some cases, temporal changes in, rock uplift rate. Owing to an incomplete understanding of river response to rock uplift, the method remains primarily a qualitative tool for neotectonic investigations; we conclude with a discussion of research needs that must be met before we can extract quantitative information about tectonics directly from topography.

KW - Channel geometry

KW - Digital elevation models

KW - Geomorphology

KW - Neotectonics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76149114960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76149114960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1130/2006.2398(04)

DO - 10.1130/2006.2398(04)

M3 - Article

VL - 398

SP - 55

EP - 74

JO - Special Paper of the Geological Society of America

JF - Special Paper of the Geological Society of America

SN - 0072-1077

ER -