TY - JOUR
T1 - Technocratic populism in hybrid regimes
T2 - Georgia on my mind and in my pocket
AU - Aprasidze, David
AU - Siroky, David S.
N1 - Funding Information:
An earlier version of this article was presented at the International Workshop: Anti-Elitism: Varieties of Technocratic Populism around the World, at the University of Jena, Germany, in February 2020. We are thankful to the Academic Editors Petra Guasti and Lenka Bu?t?kov? for excellent guidance and support through-out, and to three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal).
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Most studies of technocratic populism have focused on democracies under stress (e.g., Italy, Czech Republic). This article builds on and extends these studies by analyzing a hybrid regime—post-Soviet Georgia—and argues that technocratic populism in this context is utilized as a façade to cover authoritarian and oligarchic tendencies, while suspending (or reversing) democratization efforts. The state apparatus is weaponized against current and potential political opponents. Ideology is irrelevant, loyalty is key, and passivity is encouraged. The government aims to chip away at institutional checks and balances, and to demobilize the public by undermining confidence in the country’s representative institutions while increasing dependence on experienced personalities, the ‘can do experts.’ The result is most often a stable partial-reform equilibrium. We illustrate this argument with evidence from Georgia, where Bidzina Ivanishvili, the richest man in the country, came to power in 2012 and, despite not holding any official position in the government since 2013, has run the state as a firm.
AB - Most studies of technocratic populism have focused on democracies under stress (e.g., Italy, Czech Republic). This article builds on and extends these studies by analyzing a hybrid regime—post-Soviet Georgia—and argues that technocratic populism in this context is utilized as a façade to cover authoritarian and oligarchic tendencies, while suspending (or reversing) democratization efforts. The state apparatus is weaponized against current and potential political opponents. Ideology is irrelevant, loyalty is key, and passivity is encouraged. The government aims to chip away at institutional checks and balances, and to demobilize the public by undermining confidence in the country’s representative institutions while increasing dependence on experienced personalities, the ‘can do experts.’ The result is most often a stable partial-reform equilibrium. We illustrate this argument with evidence from Georgia, where Bidzina Ivanishvili, the richest man in the country, came to power in 2012 and, despite not holding any official position in the government since 2013, has run the state as a firm.
KW - Georgia
KW - Hybrid regimes
KW - Ivanishvili
KW - Populism
KW - Technocratic populism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099346300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099346300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.17645/PAG.V8I4.3370
DO - 10.17645/PAG.V8I4.3370
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099346300
VL - 8
SP - 580
EP - 589
JO - Politics and Governance
JF - Politics and Governance
SN - 2183-2463
IS - 4
ER -