Abstract

Objective: Three different team configurations are compared with the goal of better understanding human-autonomy teaming (HAT). Background: Although an extensive literature on human-automation interaction exists, much less is known about HAT in which humans and autonomous agents interact as coordinated units. Further research must be conducted to better understand how all-human teams compare to HAT. Methods: In an unmanned aerial system (UAS) context, a comparison was made among three types of three-member teams: (1) synthetic teams in which the pilot role is assigned to a synthetic teammate, (2) control teams in which the pilot was an inexperienced human, and (3) experimenter teams in which an experimenter served as an experienced pilot. Ten of each type of team participated. Measures of team performance, target processing efficiency, team situation awareness, and team verbal behaviors were analyzed. Results: Synthetic teams performed as well at the mission level as control (all human) teams but processed targets less efficiently. Experimenter teams performed better across all other measures compared to control and synthetic teams. Conclusion: Though there is potential for a synthetic agent to function as a full-fledged teammate, further advances in autonomy are needed to improve team-level dynamics in HAT teams. Application: This research contributes to our understanding of how to make autonomy a good team player.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-273
Number of pages12
JournalHuman Factors
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

autonomy
Autonomous agents
Automation
Antennas
Processing
Verbal Behavior
Research
language behavior
automation

Keywords

  • human-autonomy teaming
  • synthetic agent
  • team cognition
  • teamwork

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate : Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming. / McNeese, Nathan J.; Demir, Mustafa; Cooke, Nancy; Myers, Christopher.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 60, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 262-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McNeese, Nathan J. ; Demir, Mustafa ; Cooke, Nancy ; Myers, Christopher. / Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate : Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming. In: Human Factors. 2018 ; Vol. 60, No. 2. pp. 262-273.
@article{121d7a3e8a034443b7d896979c1f5d7b,
title = "Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming",
abstract = "Objective: Three different team configurations are compared with the goal of better understanding human-autonomy teaming (HAT). Background: Although an extensive literature on human-automation interaction exists, much less is known about HAT in which humans and autonomous agents interact as coordinated units. Further research must be conducted to better understand how all-human teams compare to HAT. Methods: In an unmanned aerial system (UAS) context, a comparison was made among three types of three-member teams: (1) synthetic teams in which the pilot role is assigned to a synthetic teammate, (2) control teams in which the pilot was an inexperienced human, and (3) experimenter teams in which an experimenter served as an experienced pilot. Ten of each type of team participated. Measures of team performance, target processing efficiency, team situation awareness, and team verbal behaviors were analyzed. Results: Synthetic teams performed as well at the mission level as control (all human) teams but processed targets less efficiently. Experimenter teams performed better across all other measures compared to control and synthetic teams. Conclusion: Though there is potential for a synthetic agent to function as a full-fledged teammate, further advances in autonomy are needed to improve team-level dynamics in HAT teams. Application: This research contributes to our understanding of how to make autonomy a good team player.",
keywords = "human-autonomy teaming, synthetic agent, team cognition, teamwork",
author = "McNeese, {Nathan J.} and Mustafa Demir and Nancy Cooke and Christopher Myers",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018720817743223",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "262--273",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate

T2 - Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming

AU - McNeese, Nathan J.

AU - Demir, Mustafa

AU - Cooke, Nancy

AU - Myers, Christopher

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Objective: Three different team configurations are compared with the goal of better understanding human-autonomy teaming (HAT). Background: Although an extensive literature on human-automation interaction exists, much less is known about HAT in which humans and autonomous agents interact as coordinated units. Further research must be conducted to better understand how all-human teams compare to HAT. Methods: In an unmanned aerial system (UAS) context, a comparison was made among three types of three-member teams: (1) synthetic teams in which the pilot role is assigned to a synthetic teammate, (2) control teams in which the pilot was an inexperienced human, and (3) experimenter teams in which an experimenter served as an experienced pilot. Ten of each type of team participated. Measures of team performance, target processing efficiency, team situation awareness, and team verbal behaviors were analyzed. Results: Synthetic teams performed as well at the mission level as control (all human) teams but processed targets less efficiently. Experimenter teams performed better across all other measures compared to control and synthetic teams. Conclusion: Though there is potential for a synthetic agent to function as a full-fledged teammate, further advances in autonomy are needed to improve team-level dynamics in HAT teams. Application: This research contributes to our understanding of how to make autonomy a good team player.

AB - Objective: Three different team configurations are compared with the goal of better understanding human-autonomy teaming (HAT). Background: Although an extensive literature on human-automation interaction exists, much less is known about HAT in which humans and autonomous agents interact as coordinated units. Further research must be conducted to better understand how all-human teams compare to HAT. Methods: In an unmanned aerial system (UAS) context, a comparison was made among three types of three-member teams: (1) synthetic teams in which the pilot role is assigned to a synthetic teammate, (2) control teams in which the pilot was an inexperienced human, and (3) experimenter teams in which an experimenter served as an experienced pilot. Ten of each type of team participated. Measures of team performance, target processing efficiency, team situation awareness, and team verbal behaviors were analyzed. Results: Synthetic teams performed as well at the mission level as control (all human) teams but processed targets less efficiently. Experimenter teams performed better across all other measures compared to control and synthetic teams. Conclusion: Though there is potential for a synthetic agent to function as a full-fledged teammate, further advances in autonomy are needed to improve team-level dynamics in HAT teams. Application: This research contributes to our understanding of how to make autonomy a good team player.

KW - human-autonomy teaming

KW - synthetic agent

KW - team cognition

KW - teamwork

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042272303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042272303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018720817743223

DO - 10.1177/0018720817743223

M3 - Article

C2 - 29185818

AN - SCOPUS:85042272303

VL - 60

SP - 262

EP - 273

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 2

ER -