Team assignment mechanics: Qualifications, availability, and the human element

Kristen Hurtado, Anusree Saseendran, Kenneth Sullivan, Jake Smithwick, Brian Lines, Brian Stone

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Team assignment within design and construction largely occurs following notice of selection to the winning firm. Upon notification, most firms use informal methods based primarily on qualifications and availability as the key factors in team assignment. Past experience with the client, current geographic location, and other variables may also be considered. Regardless of the specific considerations, team assignment mechanics within the built environment lack a sophistication consistent with the known importance of the project team to achieving successful project outcomes. One of the most overlooked components of team assignment mechanics is the significance of the "personality traits" in building teams and ensuring the various members have a high probability of being able to work and communicate effectively with each other. This paper studied the effect of honesty/humility and extraversion (from HEXACO PI-R test), and overall emotional intelligence (from emotional intelligence test, version 2.0) on team performance. A case study of 102 AEC industry professionals working in teams to complete similar project management tasks is presented. In the case study, teams specifically aligned considering these personality traits are compared to teams of random formation. Teams that were formed considering personality traits outperformed teams that were randomly formed by 68%. The findings of this study can be used to strategically form high performing teams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationConstruction Research Congress 2018
Subtitle of host publicationConstruction Project Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018
PublisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Pages158-164
Number of pages7
Volume2018-April
ISBN (Electronic)9780784481271
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
EventConstruction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Managemen, CRC 2018 - New Orleans, United States
Duration: Apr 2 2018Apr 4 2018

Other

OtherConstruction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Managemen, CRC 2018
CountryUnited States
CityNew Orleans
Period4/2/184/4/18

Fingerprint

Mechanics
Availability
Project management
Industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Hurtado, K., Saseendran, A., Sullivan, K., Smithwick, J., Lines, B., & Stone, B. (2018). Team assignment mechanics: Qualifications, availability, and the human element. In Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018 (Vol. 2018-April, pp. 158-164). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481271.016

Team assignment mechanics : Qualifications, availability, and the human element. / Hurtado, Kristen; Saseendran, Anusree; Sullivan, Kenneth; Smithwick, Jake; Lines, Brian; Stone, Brian.

Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018. Vol. 2018-April American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2018. p. 158-164.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Hurtado, K, Saseendran, A, Sullivan, K, Smithwick, J, Lines, B & Stone, B 2018, Team assignment mechanics: Qualifications, availability, and the human element. in Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018. vol. 2018-April, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), pp. 158-164, Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Managemen, CRC 2018, New Orleans, United States, 4/2/18. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481271.016
Hurtado K, Saseendran A, Sullivan K, Smithwick J, Lines B, Stone B. Team assignment mechanics: Qualifications, availability, and the human element. In Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018. Vol. 2018-April. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2018. p. 158-164 https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481271.016
Hurtado, Kristen ; Saseendran, Anusree ; Sullivan, Kenneth ; Smithwick, Jake ; Lines, Brian ; Stone, Brian. / Team assignment mechanics : Qualifications, availability, and the human element. Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018. Vol. 2018-April American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2018. pp. 158-164
@inproceedings{205f4218c0104b819d7688cbab9762ee,
title = "Team assignment mechanics: Qualifications, availability, and the human element",
abstract = "Team assignment within design and construction largely occurs following notice of selection to the winning firm. Upon notification, most firms use informal methods based primarily on qualifications and availability as the key factors in team assignment. Past experience with the client, current geographic location, and other variables may also be considered. Regardless of the specific considerations, team assignment mechanics within the built environment lack a sophistication consistent with the known importance of the project team to achieving successful project outcomes. One of the most overlooked components of team assignment mechanics is the significance of the {"}personality traits{"} in building teams and ensuring the various members have a high probability of being able to work and communicate effectively with each other. This paper studied the effect of honesty/humility and extraversion (from HEXACO PI-R test), and overall emotional intelligence (from emotional intelligence test, version 2.0) on team performance. A case study of 102 AEC industry professionals working in teams to complete similar project management tasks is presented. In the case study, teams specifically aligned considering these personality traits are compared to teams of random formation. Teams that were formed considering personality traits outperformed teams that were randomly formed by 68{\%}. The findings of this study can be used to strategically form high performing teams.",
author = "Kristen Hurtado and Anusree Saseendran and Kenneth Sullivan and Jake Smithwick and Brian Lines and Brian Stone",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/9780784481271.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2018-April",
pages = "158--164",
booktitle = "Construction Research Congress 2018",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Team assignment mechanics

T2 - Qualifications, availability, and the human element

AU - Hurtado, Kristen

AU - Saseendran, Anusree

AU - Sullivan, Kenneth

AU - Smithwick, Jake

AU - Lines, Brian

AU - Stone, Brian

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Team assignment within design and construction largely occurs following notice of selection to the winning firm. Upon notification, most firms use informal methods based primarily on qualifications and availability as the key factors in team assignment. Past experience with the client, current geographic location, and other variables may also be considered. Regardless of the specific considerations, team assignment mechanics within the built environment lack a sophistication consistent with the known importance of the project team to achieving successful project outcomes. One of the most overlooked components of team assignment mechanics is the significance of the "personality traits" in building teams and ensuring the various members have a high probability of being able to work and communicate effectively with each other. This paper studied the effect of honesty/humility and extraversion (from HEXACO PI-R test), and overall emotional intelligence (from emotional intelligence test, version 2.0) on team performance. A case study of 102 AEC industry professionals working in teams to complete similar project management tasks is presented. In the case study, teams specifically aligned considering these personality traits are compared to teams of random formation. Teams that were formed considering personality traits outperformed teams that were randomly formed by 68%. The findings of this study can be used to strategically form high performing teams.

AB - Team assignment within design and construction largely occurs following notice of selection to the winning firm. Upon notification, most firms use informal methods based primarily on qualifications and availability as the key factors in team assignment. Past experience with the client, current geographic location, and other variables may also be considered. Regardless of the specific considerations, team assignment mechanics within the built environment lack a sophistication consistent with the known importance of the project team to achieving successful project outcomes. One of the most overlooked components of team assignment mechanics is the significance of the "personality traits" in building teams and ensuring the various members have a high probability of being able to work and communicate effectively with each other. This paper studied the effect of honesty/humility and extraversion (from HEXACO PI-R test), and overall emotional intelligence (from emotional intelligence test, version 2.0) on team performance. A case study of 102 AEC industry professionals working in teams to complete similar project management tasks is presented. In the case study, teams specifically aligned considering these personality traits are compared to teams of random formation. Teams that were formed considering personality traits outperformed teams that were randomly formed by 68%. The findings of this study can be used to strategically form high performing teams.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048710888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048710888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/9780784481271.016

DO - 10.1061/9780784481271.016

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85048710888

VL - 2018-April

SP - 158

EP - 164

BT - Construction Research Congress 2018

PB - American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

ER -