Teaching the rhetoric of writing assessment

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

As writing teachers, all of us want our students to be able to assess their own writing in order to respond effectively to future contexts and form reflective and critical practices. Many of us have also heard a familiar refrain from students, often after we have evaluated or responded to their writing: "Just tell me what you want me to do," they beg us. These are assessment problems that Peter Elbow attempts to solve by arguing that we do "less ranking and more evaluation," (1999, 176); however, too much evaluation "harms the climate for learning and teaching," so he suggests "evaluation-free zones" in a course (186). These zones are meant to allow students to explore and take risks. They act in a formative manner and attempt to dislodge writing from evaluation and grading that the institutional gaze of a teacher often creates. Elbow explains that if done right, evaluation-free zones can release students from having to ask the teacher, "How am I doing, did I do OK?" (186). Elbow's solution seems quite conventional now. Almost ten years later, most writing teachers I know try to grade as little as possible and incorporate lots of writing in their classes that does not get evaluated. So it appears many have listened to Elbow's good advice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationTeaching with Student Texts
Subtitle of host publicationEssays Toward an Informed Practice
PublisherUtah State University Press
Pages46-57
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9780874217858
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

rhetoric
Teaching
evaluation
teacher
student
grading
Rhetoric
Writing Assessment
ranking
Evaluation
climate
learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Inoue, A. B. (2010). Teaching the rhetoric of writing assessment. In Teaching with Student Texts: Essays Toward an Informed Practice (pp. 46-57). Utah State University Press.

Teaching the rhetoric of writing assessment. / Inoue, Asao B.

Teaching with Student Texts: Essays Toward an Informed Practice. Utah State University Press, 2010. p. 46-57.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Inoue, AB 2010, Teaching the rhetoric of writing assessment. in Teaching with Student Texts: Essays Toward an Informed Practice. Utah State University Press, pp. 46-57.
Inoue AB. Teaching the rhetoric of writing assessment. In Teaching with Student Texts: Essays Toward an Informed Practice. Utah State University Press. 2010. p. 46-57
Inoue, Asao B. / Teaching the rhetoric of writing assessment. Teaching with Student Texts: Essays Toward an Informed Practice. Utah State University Press, 2010. pp. 46-57
@inbook{4124baac89ea4c4b97e740111990a132,
title = "Teaching the rhetoric of writing assessment",
abstract = "As writing teachers, all of us want our students to be able to assess their own writing in order to respond effectively to future contexts and form reflective and critical practices. Many of us have also heard a familiar refrain from students, often after we have evaluated or responded to their writing: {"}Just tell me what you want me to do,{"} they beg us. These are assessment problems that Peter Elbow attempts to solve by arguing that we do {"}less ranking and more evaluation,{"} (1999, 176); however, too much evaluation {"}harms the climate for learning and teaching,{"} so he suggests {"}evaluation-free zones{"} in a course (186). These zones are meant to allow students to explore and take risks. They act in a formative manner and attempt to dislodge writing from evaluation and grading that the institutional gaze of a teacher often creates. Elbow explains that if done right, evaluation-free zones can release students from having to ask the teacher, {"}How am I doing, did I do OK?{"} (186). Elbow's solution seems quite conventional now. Almost ten years later, most writing teachers I know try to grade as little as possible and incorporate lots of writing in their classes that does not get evaluated. So it appears many have listened to Elbow's good advice.",
author = "Inoue, {Asao B.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780874217858",
pages = "46--57",
booktitle = "Teaching with Student Texts",
publisher = "Utah State University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Teaching the rhetoric of writing assessment

AU - Inoue, Asao B.

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - As writing teachers, all of us want our students to be able to assess their own writing in order to respond effectively to future contexts and form reflective and critical practices. Many of us have also heard a familiar refrain from students, often after we have evaluated or responded to their writing: "Just tell me what you want me to do," they beg us. These are assessment problems that Peter Elbow attempts to solve by arguing that we do "less ranking and more evaluation," (1999, 176); however, too much evaluation "harms the climate for learning and teaching," so he suggests "evaluation-free zones" in a course (186). These zones are meant to allow students to explore and take risks. They act in a formative manner and attempt to dislodge writing from evaluation and grading that the institutional gaze of a teacher often creates. Elbow explains that if done right, evaluation-free zones can release students from having to ask the teacher, "How am I doing, did I do OK?" (186). Elbow's solution seems quite conventional now. Almost ten years later, most writing teachers I know try to grade as little as possible and incorporate lots of writing in their classes that does not get evaluated. So it appears many have listened to Elbow's good advice.

AB - As writing teachers, all of us want our students to be able to assess their own writing in order to respond effectively to future contexts and form reflective and critical practices. Many of us have also heard a familiar refrain from students, often after we have evaluated or responded to their writing: "Just tell me what you want me to do," they beg us. These are assessment problems that Peter Elbow attempts to solve by arguing that we do "less ranking and more evaluation," (1999, 176); however, too much evaluation "harms the climate for learning and teaching," so he suggests "evaluation-free zones" in a course (186). These zones are meant to allow students to explore and take risks. They act in a formative manner and attempt to dislodge writing from evaluation and grading that the institutional gaze of a teacher often creates. Elbow explains that if done right, evaluation-free zones can release students from having to ask the teacher, "How am I doing, did I do OK?" (186). Elbow's solution seems quite conventional now. Almost ten years later, most writing teachers I know try to grade as little as possible and incorporate lots of writing in their classes that does not get evaluated. So it appears many have listened to Elbow's good advice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894960715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894960715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84894960715

SN - 9780874217858

SP - 46

EP - 57

BT - Teaching with Student Texts

PB - Utah State University Press

ER -