Teachers' choices of test-item formats for classes with diverse achievement levels

Kandace Fleming, Margaret Ross, Nona Tollefson, Samuel B. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Junior and senior high school teachers in core subject areas (n = 102) were randomly assigned to read 1 of 3 scenarios describing classrooms composed of students of different ability levels: all low-ability, all high-ability, or both high-and low-ability students. After reading the assigned scenario, teachers indicated how they would assign test items over the dimensions of item type and cognitive complexity for the students described. Teachers also gave estimates of difficulty and pass rate for different types of items. Teachers who read scenarios about a high-achieving class reported that they would construct tests with significantly fewer recognition than essay items, whereas teachers who read scenarios about a low-achieving or a mixed-ability class reported that they would construct tests with more recognition items than essay items. Teachers who read scenarios describing low-and mixed-ability classrooms included significantly more memorization and application items than higher order items.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)222-228
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Educational Research
Volume91
Issue number4
StatePublished - Mar 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

scenario
ability
teacher
classroom
student
school

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Fleming, K., Ross, M., Tollefson, N., & Green, S. B. (1998). Teachers' choices of test-item formats for classes with diverse achievement levels. Journal of Educational Research, 91(4), 222-228.

Teachers' choices of test-item formats for classes with diverse achievement levels. / Fleming, Kandace; Ross, Margaret; Tollefson, Nona; Green, Samuel B.

In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 91, No. 4, 03.1998, p. 222-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fleming, K, Ross, M, Tollefson, N & Green, SB 1998, 'Teachers' choices of test-item formats for classes with diverse achievement levels', Journal of Educational Research, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 222-228.
Fleming, Kandace ; Ross, Margaret ; Tollefson, Nona ; Green, Samuel B. / Teachers' choices of test-item formats for classes with diverse achievement levels. In: Journal of Educational Research. 1998 ; Vol. 91, No. 4. pp. 222-228.
@article{e52b38f38ae54f83b1bce1a194dbf5ba,
title = "Teachers' choices of test-item formats for classes with diverse achievement levels",
abstract = "Junior and senior high school teachers in core subject areas (n = 102) were randomly assigned to read 1 of 3 scenarios describing classrooms composed of students of different ability levels: all low-ability, all high-ability, or both high-and low-ability students. After reading the assigned scenario, teachers indicated how they would assign test items over the dimensions of item type and cognitive complexity for the students described. Teachers also gave estimates of difficulty and pass rate for different types of items. Teachers who read scenarios about a high-achieving class reported that they would construct tests with significantly fewer recognition than essay items, whereas teachers who read scenarios about a low-achieving or a mixed-ability class reported that they would construct tests with more recognition items than essay items. Teachers who read scenarios describing low-and mixed-ability classrooms included significantly more memorization and application items than higher order items.",
author = "Kandace Fleming and Margaret Ross and Nona Tollefson and Green, {Samuel B.}",
year = "1998",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "222--228",
journal = "Journal of Educational Research",
issn = "0022-0671",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teachers' choices of test-item formats for classes with diverse achievement levels

AU - Fleming, Kandace

AU - Ross, Margaret

AU - Tollefson, Nona

AU - Green, Samuel B.

PY - 1998/3

Y1 - 1998/3

N2 - Junior and senior high school teachers in core subject areas (n = 102) were randomly assigned to read 1 of 3 scenarios describing classrooms composed of students of different ability levels: all low-ability, all high-ability, or both high-and low-ability students. After reading the assigned scenario, teachers indicated how they would assign test items over the dimensions of item type and cognitive complexity for the students described. Teachers also gave estimates of difficulty and pass rate for different types of items. Teachers who read scenarios about a high-achieving class reported that they would construct tests with significantly fewer recognition than essay items, whereas teachers who read scenarios about a low-achieving or a mixed-ability class reported that they would construct tests with more recognition items than essay items. Teachers who read scenarios describing low-and mixed-ability classrooms included significantly more memorization and application items than higher order items.

AB - Junior and senior high school teachers in core subject areas (n = 102) were randomly assigned to read 1 of 3 scenarios describing classrooms composed of students of different ability levels: all low-ability, all high-ability, or both high-and low-ability students. After reading the assigned scenario, teachers indicated how they would assign test items over the dimensions of item type and cognitive complexity for the students described. Teachers also gave estimates of difficulty and pass rate for different types of items. Teachers who read scenarios about a high-achieving class reported that they would construct tests with significantly fewer recognition than essay items, whereas teachers who read scenarios about a low-achieving or a mixed-ability class reported that they would construct tests with more recognition items than essay items. Teachers who read scenarios describing low-and mixed-ability classrooms included significantly more memorization and application items than higher order items.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040714093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040714093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 222

EP - 228

JO - Journal of Educational Research

JF - Journal of Educational Research

SN - 0022-0671

IS - 4

ER -