Teacher perceptions and the consequential validity of an alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities

Andrew T. Roach, Stephen Elliott, Sandra Berndt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to understand the variables that influence teachers' perceptions regarding one state's alternate assessment process and results. Elementary and secondary special education teachers (N = 113) from across Wisconsin participated, submitting case materials for one of their students. These materials included the a copy of the students' Wisconsin Alternative Assessment (WAA) rating scale and current Individualized Education Program (IEP); a brief survey regarding their perceptions of the WAA; and a curricular access questionnaire that documented which WAA items were part of the student's curriculum during the current or previous school year. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between predictor variables and teachers' perceptions as reported on the teacher survey. The results indicated student grade level accounted for the small amount of the variation in teacher's positive perceptions of the WAA. These results are discussed in the context of consequential evidence for the validity of the WAA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-175
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Disability Policy Studies
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

disability
Students
teacher
student
Special Education
Process Assessment (Health Care)
rating scale
special education
Curriculum
regression analysis
school grade
Regression Analysis
Education
curriculum
questionnaire
school
evidence
Surveys and Questionnaires
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Teacher perceptions and the consequential validity of an alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities. / Roach, Andrew T.; Elliott, Stephen; Berndt, Sandra.

In: Journal of Disability Policy Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, 12.2007, p. 168-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{80402efdf0364a12921049211bc36f1a,
title = "Teacher perceptions and the consequential validity of an alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities",
abstract = "The purpose of this investigation was to understand the variables that influence teachers' perceptions regarding one state's alternate assessment process and results. Elementary and secondary special education teachers (N = 113) from across Wisconsin participated, submitting case materials for one of their students. These materials included the a copy of the students' Wisconsin Alternative Assessment (WAA) rating scale and current Individualized Education Program (IEP); a brief survey regarding their perceptions of the WAA; and a curricular access questionnaire that documented which WAA items were part of the student's curriculum during the current or previous school year. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between predictor variables and teachers' perceptions as reported on the teacher survey. The results indicated student grade level accounted for the small amount of the variation in teacher's positive perceptions of the WAA. These results are discussed in the context of consequential evidence for the validity of the WAA.",
author = "Roach, {Andrew T.} and Stephen Elliott and Sandra Berndt",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/10442073070180030501",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "168--175",
journal = "Journal of Disability Policy Studies",
issn = "1044-2073",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teacher perceptions and the consequential validity of an alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities

AU - Roach, Andrew T.

AU - Elliott, Stephen

AU - Berndt, Sandra

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - The purpose of this investigation was to understand the variables that influence teachers' perceptions regarding one state's alternate assessment process and results. Elementary and secondary special education teachers (N = 113) from across Wisconsin participated, submitting case materials for one of their students. These materials included the a copy of the students' Wisconsin Alternative Assessment (WAA) rating scale and current Individualized Education Program (IEP); a brief survey regarding their perceptions of the WAA; and a curricular access questionnaire that documented which WAA items were part of the student's curriculum during the current or previous school year. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between predictor variables and teachers' perceptions as reported on the teacher survey. The results indicated student grade level accounted for the small amount of the variation in teacher's positive perceptions of the WAA. These results are discussed in the context of consequential evidence for the validity of the WAA.

AB - The purpose of this investigation was to understand the variables that influence teachers' perceptions regarding one state's alternate assessment process and results. Elementary and secondary special education teachers (N = 113) from across Wisconsin participated, submitting case materials for one of their students. These materials included the a copy of the students' Wisconsin Alternative Assessment (WAA) rating scale and current Individualized Education Program (IEP); a brief survey regarding their perceptions of the WAA; and a curricular access questionnaire that documented which WAA items were part of the student's curriculum during the current or previous school year. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between predictor variables and teachers' perceptions as reported on the teacher survey. The results indicated student grade level accounted for the small amount of the variation in teacher's positive perceptions of the WAA. These results are discussed in the context of consequential evidence for the validity of the WAA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37749043952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37749043952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/10442073070180030501

DO - 10.1177/10442073070180030501

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:37749043952

VL - 18

SP - 168

EP - 175

JO - Journal of Disability Policy Studies

JF - Journal of Disability Policy Studies

SN - 1044-2073

IS - 3

ER -