Teacher fidelity to a physical education curricular model and physical activity outcomes

Michalis Stylianou, Tiffany Kloeppel, Pamela Kulinna, Hans Van Der Mars

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study was informed by the bodies of literature emphasizing the role of physical education in promoting physical activity (PA) and addressing teacher fidelity to curricular models. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare student PA levels, lesson context, and teacher PA promotion behavior among classes where teachers were using the Dynamic Physical Education (DPE) curricular model with low, moderate, and high fidelity. Methods: Participants were 20 physical education teachers, and their 4th and 5th grade students. Each teacher was observed teaching three times during the study. Fidelity data were collected using a validated observation instrument. PA, lesson context, and teacher behavior data were collected using the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT). Data analysis included descriptive statistics and group difference tests. Results: Significant differences among the three fidelity groups were identified in several items of the observation instrument. No significant moderate-to-vigorous PA or lesson context differences were found among the three groups. Students taught by teachers in the high fidelity group spent a significantly higher proportion of lesson time (7.5%) in vigorous PA than students taught by teachers in the low fidelity group. Teachers in the moderate and high fidelity groups spent a significantly higher proportion of lesson time promoting in-class PA than teachers in the low fidelity group. Discussion: Fidelity of implementation to the DPE model had little impact on student PA. The findings of this study can inform future researchers about the methodological importance of examining teacher fidelity to curricular models and associated outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-348
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Teaching in Physical Education
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Physical Education and Training
physical education
Exercise
teacher
Students
Group
student
Observation
teachers' behavior
Teaching
descriptive statistics
fitness
Research Personnel
data analysis
promotion
school grade
instruction

Keywords

  • Dynamic physical education
  • Elementary school
  • SOFIT
  • Systematic observation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Education
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Teacher fidelity to a physical education curricular model and physical activity outcomes. / Stylianou, Michalis; Kloeppel, Tiffany; Kulinna, Pamela; Van Der Mars, Hans.

In: Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2016, p. 337-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b7dd0d9d3a88404aa3dcbe04bab70759,
title = "Teacher fidelity to a physical education curricular model and physical activity outcomes",
abstract = "Background: This study was informed by the bodies of literature emphasizing the role of physical education in promoting physical activity (PA) and addressing teacher fidelity to curricular models. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare student PA levels, lesson context, and teacher PA promotion behavior among classes where teachers were using the Dynamic Physical Education (DPE) curricular model with low, moderate, and high fidelity. Methods: Participants were 20 physical education teachers, and their 4th and 5th grade students. Each teacher was observed teaching three times during the study. Fidelity data were collected using a validated observation instrument. PA, lesson context, and teacher behavior data were collected using the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT). Data analysis included descriptive statistics and group difference tests. Results: Significant differences among the three fidelity groups were identified in several items of the observation instrument. No significant moderate-to-vigorous PA or lesson context differences were found among the three groups. Students taught by teachers in the high fidelity group spent a significantly higher proportion of lesson time (7.5{\%}) in vigorous PA than students taught by teachers in the low fidelity group. Teachers in the moderate and high fidelity groups spent a significantly higher proportion of lesson time promoting in-class PA than teachers in the low fidelity group. Discussion: Fidelity of implementation to the DPE model had little impact on student PA. The findings of this study can inform future researchers about the methodological importance of examining teacher fidelity to curricular models and associated outcomes.",
keywords = "Dynamic physical education, Elementary school, SOFIT, Systematic observation",
author = "Michalis Stylianou and Tiffany Kloeppel and Pamela Kulinna and {Van Der Mars}, Hans",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1123/jtpe.2016-0112",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "337--348",
journal = "Journal of Teaching in Physical Education",
issn = "0273-5024",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teacher fidelity to a physical education curricular model and physical activity outcomes

AU - Stylianou, Michalis

AU - Kloeppel, Tiffany

AU - Kulinna, Pamela

AU - Van Der Mars, Hans

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: This study was informed by the bodies of literature emphasizing the role of physical education in promoting physical activity (PA) and addressing teacher fidelity to curricular models. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare student PA levels, lesson context, and teacher PA promotion behavior among classes where teachers were using the Dynamic Physical Education (DPE) curricular model with low, moderate, and high fidelity. Methods: Participants were 20 physical education teachers, and their 4th and 5th grade students. Each teacher was observed teaching three times during the study. Fidelity data were collected using a validated observation instrument. PA, lesson context, and teacher behavior data were collected using the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT). Data analysis included descriptive statistics and group difference tests. Results: Significant differences among the three fidelity groups were identified in several items of the observation instrument. No significant moderate-to-vigorous PA or lesson context differences were found among the three groups. Students taught by teachers in the high fidelity group spent a significantly higher proportion of lesson time (7.5%) in vigorous PA than students taught by teachers in the low fidelity group. Teachers in the moderate and high fidelity groups spent a significantly higher proportion of lesson time promoting in-class PA than teachers in the low fidelity group. Discussion: Fidelity of implementation to the DPE model had little impact on student PA. The findings of this study can inform future researchers about the methodological importance of examining teacher fidelity to curricular models and associated outcomes.

AB - Background: This study was informed by the bodies of literature emphasizing the role of physical education in promoting physical activity (PA) and addressing teacher fidelity to curricular models. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare student PA levels, lesson context, and teacher PA promotion behavior among classes where teachers were using the Dynamic Physical Education (DPE) curricular model with low, moderate, and high fidelity. Methods: Participants were 20 physical education teachers, and their 4th and 5th grade students. Each teacher was observed teaching three times during the study. Fidelity data were collected using a validated observation instrument. PA, lesson context, and teacher behavior data were collected using the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT). Data analysis included descriptive statistics and group difference tests. Results: Significant differences among the three fidelity groups were identified in several items of the observation instrument. No significant moderate-to-vigorous PA or lesson context differences were found among the three groups. Students taught by teachers in the high fidelity group spent a significantly higher proportion of lesson time (7.5%) in vigorous PA than students taught by teachers in the low fidelity group. Teachers in the moderate and high fidelity groups spent a significantly higher proportion of lesson time promoting in-class PA than teachers in the low fidelity group. Discussion: Fidelity of implementation to the DPE model had little impact on student PA. The findings of this study can inform future researchers about the methodological importance of examining teacher fidelity to curricular models and associated outcomes.

KW - Dynamic physical education

KW - Elementary school

KW - SOFIT

KW - Systematic observation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000405924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85000405924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/jtpe.2016-0112

DO - 10.1123/jtpe.2016-0112

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 337

EP - 348

JO - Journal of Teaching in Physical Education

JF - Journal of Teaching in Physical Education

SN - 0273-5024

IS - 4

ER -