Targeted foreign aid and international migration

Is development-promotion an effective immigration policy?

Jonas Gamso, Farhod Yuldashev

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Faced with the failure of traditional immigration controls, policymakers in the United States and Western Europe increasingly look to foreign aid to reduce migrant inflows. Some analysts expect assistance to improve living standards in source countries, thereby deterring residents from moving abroad. While this idea makes intuitive sense, research on aid and migration shows mixed results: some scholarly work supports aid-based migration policies, but other analyses suggest that aid actually enables migration by providing individuals with resources that facilitate movement across borders. We suggest that this tension in the literature reflects a failure to distinguish between different types of foreign aid. Drawing on recent work demonstrating the heterogeneous effects of various aid projects, we posit that governance aid should deter emigration by enhancing government capacity and alleviating political push factors; in contrast, economic and social aid should enable migration by increasing individuals' means and capabilities to move. We test our hypotheses on a panel of 101 developing countries spanning twentyfive years (1985-2010). We find that governance aid does reduce emigration rates from developing countries, while other types of aid appear not to affect migration.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)809-820
    Number of pages12
    JournalInternational Studies Quarterly
    Volume62
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    immigration policy
    international migration
    promotion
    migration
    emigration
    developing country
    governance
    migration policy
    living standard
    political factors
    Western Europe
    immigration
    migrant
    assistance
    resident
    resources
    economics

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Political Science and International Relations

    Cite this

    Targeted foreign aid and international migration : Is development-promotion an effective immigration policy? / Gamso, Jonas; Yuldashev, Farhod.

    In: International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 62, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 809-820.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{51079ccc81ad4e199bfd72029fff2af4,
    title = "Targeted foreign aid and international migration: Is development-promotion an effective immigration policy?",
    abstract = "Faced with the failure of traditional immigration controls, policymakers in the United States and Western Europe increasingly look to foreign aid to reduce migrant inflows. Some analysts expect assistance to improve living standards in source countries, thereby deterring residents from moving abroad. While this idea makes intuitive sense, research on aid and migration shows mixed results: some scholarly work supports aid-based migration policies, but other analyses suggest that aid actually enables migration by providing individuals with resources that facilitate movement across borders. We suggest that this tension in the literature reflects a failure to distinguish between different types of foreign aid. Drawing on recent work demonstrating the heterogeneous effects of various aid projects, we posit that governance aid should deter emigration by enhancing government capacity and alleviating political push factors; in contrast, economic and social aid should enable migration by increasing individuals' means and capabilities to move. We test our hypotheses on a panel of 101 developing countries spanning twentyfive years (1985-2010). We find that governance aid does reduce emigration rates from developing countries, while other types of aid appear not to affect migration.",
    author = "Jonas Gamso and Farhod Yuldashev",
    year = "2018",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1093/ISQ/SQY029",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "62",
    pages = "809--820",
    journal = "International Studies Quarterly",
    issn = "0020-8833",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Targeted foreign aid and international migration

    T2 - Is development-promotion an effective immigration policy?

    AU - Gamso, Jonas

    AU - Yuldashev, Farhod

    PY - 2018/12/1

    Y1 - 2018/12/1

    N2 - Faced with the failure of traditional immigration controls, policymakers in the United States and Western Europe increasingly look to foreign aid to reduce migrant inflows. Some analysts expect assistance to improve living standards in source countries, thereby deterring residents from moving abroad. While this idea makes intuitive sense, research on aid and migration shows mixed results: some scholarly work supports aid-based migration policies, but other analyses suggest that aid actually enables migration by providing individuals with resources that facilitate movement across borders. We suggest that this tension in the literature reflects a failure to distinguish between different types of foreign aid. Drawing on recent work demonstrating the heterogeneous effects of various aid projects, we posit that governance aid should deter emigration by enhancing government capacity and alleviating political push factors; in contrast, economic and social aid should enable migration by increasing individuals' means and capabilities to move. We test our hypotheses on a panel of 101 developing countries spanning twentyfive years (1985-2010). We find that governance aid does reduce emigration rates from developing countries, while other types of aid appear not to affect migration.

    AB - Faced with the failure of traditional immigration controls, policymakers in the United States and Western Europe increasingly look to foreign aid to reduce migrant inflows. Some analysts expect assistance to improve living standards in source countries, thereby deterring residents from moving abroad. While this idea makes intuitive sense, research on aid and migration shows mixed results: some scholarly work supports aid-based migration policies, but other analyses suggest that aid actually enables migration by providing individuals with resources that facilitate movement across borders. We suggest that this tension in the literature reflects a failure to distinguish between different types of foreign aid. Drawing on recent work demonstrating the heterogeneous effects of various aid projects, we posit that governance aid should deter emigration by enhancing government capacity and alleviating political push factors; in contrast, economic and social aid should enable migration by increasing individuals' means and capabilities to move. We test our hypotheses on a panel of 101 developing countries spanning twentyfive years (1985-2010). We find that governance aid does reduce emigration rates from developing countries, while other types of aid appear not to affect migration.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060861593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060861593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/ISQ/SQY029

    DO - 10.1093/ISQ/SQY029

    M3 - Article

    VL - 62

    SP - 809

    EP - 820

    JO - International Studies Quarterly

    JF - International Studies Quarterly

    SN - 0020-8833

    IS - 4

    ER -