Taken for granted? Managing for social equity in grant programs

Brian K. Collins, Brian Gerber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Managing for social equity performance has long been a goal without much guidance for public managers. We examine social equity performance in the context of indirect governance through the administration of grant programs and, more specifically, the matching of policy responses (grant funding) to social needs. Grant program managers must allocate funding to match needs while also ensuring accountability, but common administrative models that rely on competition can undermine social equity performance. We develop a unique framework to analyze the relative social equity performance of four models of grant administration in general. These models are defined by whether competitions or formulas are used to select grantees and to allocate funding. We test the implications of the framework in an analysis of funding distributions from the nonentitlement Community Development Block Grant program in four states. Our findings suggest that social equity in grant programs is better served when grantors do not rely solely on competitive grant contracting in the selection and distribution of grant funds, which is typical in grant administration. However, policy makers and managers can design institutional arrangements that utilize competition, but in a manner that does not create a bias against more socially equitable funding decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1128-1141
Number of pages14
JournalPublic Administration Review
Volume68
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

grant
equity
funding
manager
performance
Social equity
Funding
community development
Managers
governance
responsibility
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Taken for granted? Managing for social equity in grant programs. / Collins, Brian K.; Gerber, Brian.

In: Public Administration Review, Vol. 68, No. 6, 11.2008, p. 1128-1141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a84794f6029d4c9da34a0cfb02e1946a,
title = "Taken for granted? Managing for social equity in grant programs",
abstract = "Managing for social equity performance has long been a goal without much guidance for public managers. We examine social equity performance in the context of indirect governance through the administration of grant programs and, more specifically, the matching of policy responses (grant funding) to social needs. Grant program managers must allocate funding to match needs while also ensuring accountability, but common administrative models that rely on competition can undermine social equity performance. We develop a unique framework to analyze the relative social equity performance of four models of grant administration in general. These models are defined by whether competitions or formulas are used to select grantees and to allocate funding. We test the implications of the framework in an analysis of funding distributions from the nonentitlement Community Development Block Grant program in four states. Our findings suggest that social equity in grant programs is better served when grantors do not rely solely on competitive grant contracting in the selection and distribution of grant funds, which is typical in grant administration. However, policy makers and managers can design institutional arrangements that utilize competition, but in a manner that does not create a bias against more socially equitable funding decisions.",
author = "Collins, {Brian K.} and Brian Gerber",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00960.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "1128--1141",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taken for granted? Managing for social equity in grant programs

AU - Collins, Brian K.

AU - Gerber, Brian

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Managing for social equity performance has long been a goal without much guidance for public managers. We examine social equity performance in the context of indirect governance through the administration of grant programs and, more specifically, the matching of policy responses (grant funding) to social needs. Grant program managers must allocate funding to match needs while also ensuring accountability, but common administrative models that rely on competition can undermine social equity performance. We develop a unique framework to analyze the relative social equity performance of four models of grant administration in general. These models are defined by whether competitions or formulas are used to select grantees and to allocate funding. We test the implications of the framework in an analysis of funding distributions from the nonentitlement Community Development Block Grant program in four states. Our findings suggest that social equity in grant programs is better served when grantors do not rely solely on competitive grant contracting in the selection and distribution of grant funds, which is typical in grant administration. However, policy makers and managers can design institutional arrangements that utilize competition, but in a manner that does not create a bias against more socially equitable funding decisions.

AB - Managing for social equity performance has long been a goal without much guidance for public managers. We examine social equity performance in the context of indirect governance through the administration of grant programs and, more specifically, the matching of policy responses (grant funding) to social needs. Grant program managers must allocate funding to match needs while also ensuring accountability, but common administrative models that rely on competition can undermine social equity performance. We develop a unique framework to analyze the relative social equity performance of four models of grant administration in general. These models are defined by whether competitions or formulas are used to select grantees and to allocate funding. We test the implications of the framework in an analysis of funding distributions from the nonentitlement Community Development Block Grant program in four states. Our findings suggest that social equity in grant programs is better served when grantors do not rely solely on competitive grant contracting in the selection and distribution of grant funds, which is typical in grant administration. However, policy makers and managers can design institutional arrangements that utilize competition, but in a manner that does not create a bias against more socially equitable funding decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54149108253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54149108253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00960.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00960.x

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 1128

EP - 1141

JO - Public Administration Review

JF - Public Administration Review

SN - 0033-3352

IS - 6

ER -