Tainted recommendations

The social comparison bias

Stephen M. Garcia, Hyunjin Song, Abraham Tesser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present analysis reveals the social comparison bias - a bias that emerges from the social comparison process and taints recommendations. We hypothesize that people who have high standing on a relevant dimension (e.g., quantity of publications) begin to protect their social comparison context by making recommendations that prevent others, who might surpass them on the relevant dimension, from entering their comparison context. Studies 1 and 2 instantiate this effect in both hypothetical and real decision situations, showing that people tend not to recommend individuals who surpass them on the relevant dimension on which they have high standing. Finally, Study 3, in a sample of real employees, links the effect to one's concern for protecting self-esteem. Theoretical and organizational implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-101
Number of pages5
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume113
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Self Concept
Publications
Social comparison

Keywords

  • Choice behavior
  • Decision making
  • Social comparison

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Tainted recommendations : The social comparison bias. / Garcia, Stephen M.; Song, Hyunjin; Tesser, Abraham.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 113, No. 2, 11.2010, p. 97-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Garcia, Stephen M. ; Song, Hyunjin ; Tesser, Abraham. / Tainted recommendations : The social comparison bias. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2010 ; Vol. 113, No. 2. pp. 97-101.
@article{bb8ceb6ba8ab4efd916a0510240b342d,
title = "Tainted recommendations: The social comparison bias",
abstract = "The present analysis reveals the social comparison bias - a bias that emerges from the social comparison process and taints recommendations. We hypothesize that people who have high standing on a relevant dimension (e.g., quantity of publications) begin to protect their social comparison context by making recommendations that prevent others, who might surpass them on the relevant dimension, from entering their comparison context. Studies 1 and 2 instantiate this effect in both hypothetical and real decision situations, showing that people tend not to recommend individuals who surpass them on the relevant dimension on which they have high standing. Finally, Study 3, in a sample of real employees, links the effect to one's concern for protecting self-esteem. Theoretical and organizational implications are discussed.",
keywords = "Choice behavior, Decision making, Social comparison",
author = "Garcia, {Stephen M.} and Hyunjin Song and Abraham Tesser",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "97--101",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tainted recommendations

T2 - The social comparison bias

AU - Garcia, Stephen M.

AU - Song, Hyunjin

AU - Tesser, Abraham

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - The present analysis reveals the social comparison bias - a bias that emerges from the social comparison process and taints recommendations. We hypothesize that people who have high standing on a relevant dimension (e.g., quantity of publications) begin to protect their social comparison context by making recommendations that prevent others, who might surpass them on the relevant dimension, from entering their comparison context. Studies 1 and 2 instantiate this effect in both hypothetical and real decision situations, showing that people tend not to recommend individuals who surpass them on the relevant dimension on which they have high standing. Finally, Study 3, in a sample of real employees, links the effect to one's concern for protecting self-esteem. Theoretical and organizational implications are discussed.

AB - The present analysis reveals the social comparison bias - a bias that emerges from the social comparison process and taints recommendations. We hypothesize that people who have high standing on a relevant dimension (e.g., quantity of publications) begin to protect their social comparison context by making recommendations that prevent others, who might surpass them on the relevant dimension, from entering their comparison context. Studies 1 and 2 instantiate this effect in both hypothetical and real decision situations, showing that people tend not to recommend individuals who surpass them on the relevant dimension on which they have high standing. Finally, Study 3, in a sample of real employees, links the effect to one's concern for protecting self-esteem. Theoretical and organizational implications are discussed.

KW - Choice behavior

KW - Decision making

KW - Social comparison

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957110748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957110748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 97

EP - 101

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 2

ER -