Tactile perception: Do distinct subpopulations explain differences in mislocalization rates of stimuli across fingertips?

Jay P. Warren, Stephen Helms Tillery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a previous study we were able to demonstrate that the Cutaneous Rabbit Effect (CRE) could be induced across fingertips using a form of the reduced rabbit paradigm and electrotactile stimuli. The CRE, as used here, is an illusory phenomenon where two stimuli are rapidly at a site and then a stimulus is presented to a nearby site. The perception of the second of the stimuli is not at its presented location but at a site between the first and last stimuli. In this experiment, though the overall population did perceive the mislocalized stimuli as the CRE would predict, some subjects were very infrequently observed to mislocalize stimuli due to the CRE or other effects. Here we further examine this phenomena, attempting to identify whether a subpopulation exists that rarely mislocalizes stimuli on their fingertips. To test for this subpopulation, we reexamined the collected data from the previously published experiment and other unpublished data relating to that study. By examining these data for rates of mislocalization utilizing our previous metric we identified that there is a perceptual subpopulation that very infrequently misidentifies the location of a fingertip stimulus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalNeuroscience Letters
Volume505
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 7 2011

Fingerprint

Touch Perception
Rabbits
Skin
Population

Keywords

  • Electrocutaneous
  • Electrotactile
  • Fingertips
  • Perceptual subpopulations
  • Touch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Tactile perception : Do distinct subpopulations explain differences in mislocalization rates of stimuli across fingertips? / Warren, Jay P.; Helms Tillery, Stephen.

In: Neuroscience Letters, Vol. 505, No. 1, 07.11.2011, p. 1-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d9141e76341a4d3ca44c7998f9b816bc,
title = "Tactile perception: Do distinct subpopulations explain differences in mislocalization rates of stimuli across fingertips?",
abstract = "In a previous study we were able to demonstrate that the Cutaneous Rabbit Effect (CRE) could be induced across fingertips using a form of the reduced rabbit paradigm and electrotactile stimuli. The CRE, as used here, is an illusory phenomenon where two stimuli are rapidly at a site and then a stimulus is presented to a nearby site. The perception of the second of the stimuli is not at its presented location but at a site between the first and last stimuli. In this experiment, though the overall population did perceive the mislocalized stimuli as the CRE would predict, some subjects were very infrequently observed to mislocalize stimuli due to the CRE or other effects. Here we further examine this phenomena, attempting to identify whether a subpopulation exists that rarely mislocalizes stimuli on their fingertips. To test for this subpopulation, we reexamined the collected data from the previously published experiment and other unpublished data relating to that study. By examining these data for rates of mislocalization utilizing our previous metric we identified that there is a perceptual subpopulation that very infrequently misidentifies the location of a fingertip stimulus.",
keywords = "Electrocutaneous, Electrotactile, Fingertips, Perceptual subpopulations, Touch",
author = "Warren, {Jay P.} and {Helms Tillery}, Stephen",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "505",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "Neuroscience Letters",
issn = "0304-3940",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tactile perception

T2 - Do distinct subpopulations explain differences in mislocalization rates of stimuli across fingertips?

AU - Warren, Jay P.

AU - Helms Tillery, Stephen

PY - 2011/11/7

Y1 - 2011/11/7

N2 - In a previous study we were able to demonstrate that the Cutaneous Rabbit Effect (CRE) could be induced across fingertips using a form of the reduced rabbit paradigm and electrotactile stimuli. The CRE, as used here, is an illusory phenomenon where two stimuli are rapidly at a site and then a stimulus is presented to a nearby site. The perception of the second of the stimuli is not at its presented location but at a site between the first and last stimuli. In this experiment, though the overall population did perceive the mislocalized stimuli as the CRE would predict, some subjects were very infrequently observed to mislocalize stimuli due to the CRE or other effects. Here we further examine this phenomena, attempting to identify whether a subpopulation exists that rarely mislocalizes stimuli on their fingertips. To test for this subpopulation, we reexamined the collected data from the previously published experiment and other unpublished data relating to that study. By examining these data for rates of mislocalization utilizing our previous metric we identified that there is a perceptual subpopulation that very infrequently misidentifies the location of a fingertip stimulus.

AB - In a previous study we were able to demonstrate that the Cutaneous Rabbit Effect (CRE) could be induced across fingertips using a form of the reduced rabbit paradigm and electrotactile stimuli. The CRE, as used here, is an illusory phenomenon where two stimuli are rapidly at a site and then a stimulus is presented to a nearby site. The perception of the second of the stimuli is not at its presented location but at a site between the first and last stimuli. In this experiment, though the overall population did perceive the mislocalized stimuli as the CRE would predict, some subjects were very infrequently observed to mislocalize stimuli due to the CRE or other effects. Here we further examine this phenomena, attempting to identify whether a subpopulation exists that rarely mislocalizes stimuli on their fingertips. To test for this subpopulation, we reexamined the collected data from the previously published experiment and other unpublished data relating to that study. By examining these data for rates of mislocalization utilizing our previous metric we identified that there is a perceptual subpopulation that very infrequently misidentifies the location of a fingertip stimulus.

KW - Electrocutaneous

KW - Electrotactile

KW - Fingertips

KW - Perceptual subpopulations

KW - Touch

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82455208984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82455208984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.057

DO - 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.057

M3 - Article

C2 - 21575679

AN - SCOPUS:82455208984

VL - 505

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Neuroscience Letters

JF - Neuroscience Letters

SN - 0304-3940

IS - 1

ER -