Synthetic environment to evaluate alternative trip distribution models

Xin Ye, Wen Cheng, Xudong Jia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper an environment is synthesized to incorporate spatial distributions of population and employees and to simulate travelers' destination choice behaviors following utility-maximization decision rules. In this synthetic environment, two alternative trip distribution models - the destination choice model and the gravity model - are evaluated by comparing estimated model coefficients and trip matrices against their true counterparts. The destination choice model provides reasonable model coefficients and trip matrix when the average trip length is much greater than the zone size. However, when the average trip length comes closer to the zone size as a result of significant spatial aggregation errors the model coefficients appear more biased, and more errors occur in trip matrix estimation. In the gravity model, linear regression does not provide consistent coefficients for trip attraction variables and therefore cannot accurately estimate trip attractions. It is not optional but necessary to apply the destination choice model for consistently estimating the trip attraction and trip matrix in trip distribution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-120
Number of pages10
JournalTransportation Research Record
Issue number2302
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gravitation
Linear regression
Spatial distribution
Agglomeration
Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Synthetic environment to evaluate alternative trip distribution models. / Ye, Xin; Cheng, Wen; Jia, Xudong.

In: Transportation Research Record, No. 2302, 01.12.2012, p. 111-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{69f51274cffb457893cefee605cc5bc8,
title = "Synthetic environment to evaluate alternative trip distribution models",
abstract = "In this paper an environment is synthesized to incorporate spatial distributions of population and employees and to simulate travelers' destination choice behaviors following utility-maximization decision rules. In this synthetic environment, two alternative trip distribution models - the destination choice model and the gravity model - are evaluated by comparing estimated model coefficients and trip matrices against their true counterparts. The destination choice model provides reasonable model coefficients and trip matrix when the average trip length is much greater than the zone size. However, when the average trip length comes closer to the zone size as a result of significant spatial aggregation errors the model coefficients appear more biased, and more errors occur in trip matrix estimation. In the gravity model, linear regression does not provide consistent coefficients for trip attraction variables and therefore cannot accurately estimate trip attractions. It is not optional but necessary to apply the destination choice model for consistently estimating the trip attraction and trip matrix in trip distribution.",
author = "Xin Ye and Wen Cheng and Xudong Jia",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3141/2302-12",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "111--120",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "2302",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Synthetic environment to evaluate alternative trip distribution models

AU - Ye, Xin

AU - Cheng, Wen

AU - Jia, Xudong

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - In this paper an environment is synthesized to incorporate spatial distributions of population and employees and to simulate travelers' destination choice behaviors following utility-maximization decision rules. In this synthetic environment, two alternative trip distribution models - the destination choice model and the gravity model - are evaluated by comparing estimated model coefficients and trip matrices against their true counterparts. The destination choice model provides reasonable model coefficients and trip matrix when the average trip length is much greater than the zone size. However, when the average trip length comes closer to the zone size as a result of significant spatial aggregation errors the model coefficients appear more biased, and more errors occur in trip matrix estimation. In the gravity model, linear regression does not provide consistent coefficients for trip attraction variables and therefore cannot accurately estimate trip attractions. It is not optional but necessary to apply the destination choice model for consistently estimating the trip attraction and trip matrix in trip distribution.

AB - In this paper an environment is synthesized to incorporate spatial distributions of population and employees and to simulate travelers' destination choice behaviors following utility-maximization decision rules. In this synthetic environment, two alternative trip distribution models - the destination choice model and the gravity model - are evaluated by comparing estimated model coefficients and trip matrices against their true counterparts. The destination choice model provides reasonable model coefficients and trip matrix when the average trip length is much greater than the zone size. However, when the average trip length comes closer to the zone size as a result of significant spatial aggregation errors the model coefficients appear more biased, and more errors occur in trip matrix estimation. In the gravity model, linear regression does not provide consistent coefficients for trip attraction variables and therefore cannot accurately estimate trip attractions. It is not optional but necessary to apply the destination choice model for consistently estimating the trip attraction and trip matrix in trip distribution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872695925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872695925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3141/2302-12

DO - 10.3141/2302-12

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84872695925

SP - 111

EP - 120

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 2302

ER -