Swirling Students: Articulation Between A Major Community College District and a State-Supported Research University

Alfredo De Los Santos, Farah Sutton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

As the country experiences a recession and institutions of higher education increase tuition to compensate for diminishing state support, the transferability of credits among and between institutions is essential to students seeking to earn a baccalaureate degree. Students, parents, and taxpayers cannot afford to pay twice for the same courses or for additional courses. In this environment, articulation becomes a very important issue, particularly when research has shown that a significant number of students enroll in more than one institution on their path to a degree. The focus of this article is the swirling students between the Maricopa Community Colleges and Arizona State University. Swirling students, also a national phenomenon, encounter a number of challenges that institutions need to address. The history of articulation agreements in Arizona was explored to provide insight into the transfer model available to students enrolled at the Maricopa Community Colleges and Arizona State University. The data revealed that the extent of student swirl is greater than initially anticipated and transcends beyond lower division coursework into the senior year. After considering the findings and conclusions based on the data, this article concludes that transparent institutional intentionality is imperative to effective articulation agreements that accommodate student swirl.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)967-981
Number of pages15
JournalCommunity College Journal of Research and Practice
Volume36
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Swirling Students: Articulation Between A Major Community College District and a State-Supported Research University'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this