Sustaining a pregnant cadaver for the purpose of gestating a fetus: A limited defense

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I argue that there are times it is morally permissible to keep a brain-dead pregnant woman on life support for the sole purpose of allowing her fetus to gestate until it is able to be born as healthy as possible. While a woman should not be kept on such support if she has clearly expressed that this would contradict her wishes, she may be kept on such support if she did not make her wishes known at all. Moreover, there are reasons why her family’s wishes alone may not suffice to override the fetus’ interest in continued existence. The most difficult case to assess is when the woman had previously made it known she would not want to be sustained on artificial life support, but was not explicit concerning whether she would maintain that stance in the event of her pregancy. Finally, I will show why my position is compatible with a pro-abortion-choice perspective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)399-430
Number of pages32
JournalKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Volume26
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Cadaver
Fetus
Brain Death
Pregnant Women
abortion
brain
event
Wishes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Medicine(all)
  • Health Policy
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Sustaining a pregnant cadaver for the purpose of gestating a fetus : A limited defense. / Manninen, Bertha.

In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 399-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b6c8ae63b6374e7baea341bdd0254341,
title = "Sustaining a pregnant cadaver for the purpose of gestating a fetus: A limited defense",
abstract = "I argue that there are times it is morally permissible to keep a brain-dead pregnant woman on life support for the sole purpose of allowing her fetus to gestate until it is able to be born as healthy as possible. While a woman should not be kept on such support if she has clearly expressed that this would contradict her wishes, she may be kept on such support if she did not make her wishes known at all. Moreover, there are reasons why her family’s wishes alone may not suffice to override the fetus’ interest in continued existence. The most difficult case to assess is when the woman had previously made it known she would not want to be sustained on artificial life support, but was not explicit concerning whether she would maintain that stance in the event of her pregancy. Finally, I will show why my position is compatible with a pro-abortion-choice perspective.",
author = "Bertha Manninen",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "399--430",
journal = "Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal",
issn = "1054-6863",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustaining a pregnant cadaver for the purpose of gestating a fetus

T2 - A limited defense

AU - Manninen, Bertha

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - I argue that there are times it is morally permissible to keep a brain-dead pregnant woman on life support for the sole purpose of allowing her fetus to gestate until it is able to be born as healthy as possible. While a woman should not be kept on such support if she has clearly expressed that this would contradict her wishes, she may be kept on such support if she did not make her wishes known at all. Moreover, there are reasons why her family’s wishes alone may not suffice to override the fetus’ interest in continued existence. The most difficult case to assess is when the woman had previously made it known she would not want to be sustained on artificial life support, but was not explicit concerning whether she would maintain that stance in the event of her pregancy. Finally, I will show why my position is compatible with a pro-abortion-choice perspective.

AB - I argue that there are times it is morally permissible to keep a brain-dead pregnant woman on life support for the sole purpose of allowing her fetus to gestate until it is able to be born as healthy as possible. While a woman should not be kept on such support if she has clearly expressed that this would contradict her wishes, she may be kept on such support if she did not make her wishes known at all. Moreover, there are reasons why her family’s wishes alone may not suffice to override the fetus’ interest in continued existence. The most difficult case to assess is when the woman had previously made it known she would not want to be sustained on artificial life support, but was not explicit concerning whether she would maintain that stance in the event of her pregancy. Finally, I will show why my position is compatible with a pro-abortion-choice perspective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011097294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011097294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 28533497

AN - SCOPUS:85011097294

VL - 26

SP - 399

EP - 430

JO - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

JF - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

SN - 1054-6863

IS - 4

ER -