Sustainable hydrocarbon fuels by recycling CO2 and H 2O with renewable or nuclear energy

Christopher Graves, Sune D. Ebbesen, Mogens Mogensen, Klaus Lackner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

566 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To improve the sustainability of transportation, a major goal is the replacement of conventional petroleum-based fuels with more sustainable fuels that can be used in the existing infrastructure (fuel distribution and vehicles). While fossil-derived synthetic fuels (e.g. coal derived liquid fuels) and biofuels have received the most attention, similar hydrocarbons can be produced without using fossil fuels or biomass. Using renewable and/or nuclear energy, carbon dioxide and water can be recycled into liquid hydrocarbon fuels in non-biological processes which remove oxygen from CO2 and H 2O (the reverse of fuel combustion). Capture of CO2 from the atmosphere would enable a closed-loop carbon-neutral fuel cycle. This article critically reviews the many possible technological pathways for recycling CO2 into fuels using renewable or nuclear energy, considering three stages-CO2 capture, H2O and CO 2 dissociation, and fuel synthesis. Dissociation methods include thermolysis, thermochemical cycles, electrolysis, and photoelectrolysis of CO2 and/or H2O. High temperature co-electrolysis of H 2O and CO2 makes very efficient use of electricity and heat (near-100% electricity-to-syngas efficiency), provides high reaction rates, and directly produces syngas (CO/H2 mixture) for use in conventional catalytic fuel synthesis reactors. Capturing CO2 from the atmosphere using a solid sorbent, electrolyzing H2O and CO2 in solid oxide electrolysis cells to yield syngas, and converting the syngas to gasoline or diesel by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis is identified as one of the most promising, feasible routes. An analysis of the energy balance and economics of this CO2 recycling process is presented. We estimate that the full system can feasibly operate at 70% electricity-to-liquid fuel efficiency (higher heating value basis) and the price of electricity needed to produce synthetic gasoline at U.S.D$ 2/gal ($ 0.53/L) is 2-3 U.S. cents/kWh. For $ 3/gal ($ 0.78/L) gasoline, electricity at 4-5 cents/kWh is needed. In some regions that have inexpensive renewable electricity, such as Iceland, fuel production may already be economical. The dominant costs of the process are the electricity cost and the capital cost of the electrolyzer, and this capital cost is significantly increased when operating intermittently (on renewable power sources such as solar and wind). The potential of this CO 2 recycling process is assessed, in terms of what technological progress is needed to achieve large-scale, economically competitive production of sustainable fuels by this method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nuclear energy
Recycling
Hydrocarbons
Electricity
Gasoline
Liquid fuels
Electrolysis
Costs
Regenerative fuel cells
Synthetic fuels
Fischer-Tropsch synthesis
Thermolysis
Biofuels
Sorbents
Energy balance
Fossil fuels
Reaction rates
Sustainable development
Carbon dioxide
Biomass

Keywords

  • Carbon dioxide recycling
  • Economics
  • Electrolysis
  • Energy balance
  • Hydrocarbon fuel
  • Sustainable fuel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

Sustainable hydrocarbon fuels by recycling CO2 and H 2O with renewable or nuclear energy. / Graves, Christopher; Ebbesen, Sune D.; Mogensen, Mogens; Lackner, Klaus.

In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Graves, Christopher ; Ebbesen, Sune D. ; Mogensen, Mogens ; Lackner, Klaus. / Sustainable hydrocarbon fuels by recycling CO2 and H 2O with renewable or nuclear energy. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 1-23.
@article{89c8ee72eab443138617f96639dfb857,
title = "Sustainable hydrocarbon fuels by recycling CO2 and H 2O with renewable or nuclear energy",
abstract = "To improve the sustainability of transportation, a major goal is the replacement of conventional petroleum-based fuels with more sustainable fuels that can be used in the existing infrastructure (fuel distribution and vehicles). While fossil-derived synthetic fuels (e.g. coal derived liquid fuels) and biofuels have received the most attention, similar hydrocarbons can be produced without using fossil fuels or biomass. Using renewable and/or nuclear energy, carbon dioxide and water can be recycled into liquid hydrocarbon fuels in non-biological processes which remove oxygen from CO2 and H 2O (the reverse of fuel combustion). Capture of CO2 from the atmosphere would enable a closed-loop carbon-neutral fuel cycle. This article critically reviews the many possible technological pathways for recycling CO2 into fuels using renewable or nuclear energy, considering three stages-CO2 capture, H2O and CO 2 dissociation, and fuel synthesis. Dissociation methods include thermolysis, thermochemical cycles, electrolysis, and photoelectrolysis of CO2 and/or H2O. High temperature co-electrolysis of H 2O and CO2 makes very efficient use of electricity and heat (near-100{\%} electricity-to-syngas efficiency), provides high reaction rates, and directly produces syngas (CO/H2 mixture) for use in conventional catalytic fuel synthesis reactors. Capturing CO2 from the atmosphere using a solid sorbent, electrolyzing H2O and CO2 in solid oxide electrolysis cells to yield syngas, and converting the syngas to gasoline or diesel by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis is identified as one of the most promising, feasible routes. An analysis of the energy balance and economics of this CO2 recycling process is presented. We estimate that the full system can feasibly operate at 70{\%} electricity-to-liquid fuel efficiency (higher heating value basis) and the price of electricity needed to produce synthetic gasoline at U.S.D$ 2/gal ($ 0.53/L) is 2-3 U.S. cents/kWh. For $ 3/gal ($ 0.78/L) gasoline, electricity at 4-5 cents/kWh is needed. In some regions that have inexpensive renewable electricity, such as Iceland, fuel production may already be economical. The dominant costs of the process are the electricity cost and the capital cost of the electrolyzer, and this capital cost is significantly increased when operating intermittently (on renewable power sources such as solar and wind). The potential of this CO 2 recycling process is assessed, in terms of what technological progress is needed to achieve large-scale, economically competitive production of sustainable fuels by this method.",
keywords = "Carbon dioxide recycling, Economics, Electrolysis, Energy balance, Hydrocarbon fuel, Sustainable fuel",
author = "Christopher Graves and Ebbesen, {Sune D.} and Mogens Mogensen and Klaus Lackner",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews",
issn = "1364-0321",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainable hydrocarbon fuels by recycling CO2 and H 2O with renewable or nuclear energy

AU - Graves, Christopher

AU - Ebbesen, Sune D.

AU - Mogensen, Mogens

AU - Lackner, Klaus

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - To improve the sustainability of transportation, a major goal is the replacement of conventional petroleum-based fuels with more sustainable fuels that can be used in the existing infrastructure (fuel distribution and vehicles). While fossil-derived synthetic fuels (e.g. coal derived liquid fuels) and biofuels have received the most attention, similar hydrocarbons can be produced without using fossil fuels or biomass. Using renewable and/or nuclear energy, carbon dioxide and water can be recycled into liquid hydrocarbon fuels in non-biological processes which remove oxygen from CO2 and H 2O (the reverse of fuel combustion). Capture of CO2 from the atmosphere would enable a closed-loop carbon-neutral fuel cycle. This article critically reviews the many possible technological pathways for recycling CO2 into fuels using renewable or nuclear energy, considering three stages-CO2 capture, H2O and CO 2 dissociation, and fuel synthesis. Dissociation methods include thermolysis, thermochemical cycles, electrolysis, and photoelectrolysis of CO2 and/or H2O. High temperature co-electrolysis of H 2O and CO2 makes very efficient use of electricity and heat (near-100% electricity-to-syngas efficiency), provides high reaction rates, and directly produces syngas (CO/H2 mixture) for use in conventional catalytic fuel synthesis reactors. Capturing CO2 from the atmosphere using a solid sorbent, electrolyzing H2O and CO2 in solid oxide electrolysis cells to yield syngas, and converting the syngas to gasoline or diesel by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis is identified as one of the most promising, feasible routes. An analysis of the energy balance and economics of this CO2 recycling process is presented. We estimate that the full system can feasibly operate at 70% electricity-to-liquid fuel efficiency (higher heating value basis) and the price of electricity needed to produce synthetic gasoline at U.S.D$ 2/gal ($ 0.53/L) is 2-3 U.S. cents/kWh. For $ 3/gal ($ 0.78/L) gasoline, electricity at 4-5 cents/kWh is needed. In some regions that have inexpensive renewable electricity, such as Iceland, fuel production may already be economical. The dominant costs of the process are the electricity cost and the capital cost of the electrolyzer, and this capital cost is significantly increased when operating intermittently (on renewable power sources such as solar and wind). The potential of this CO 2 recycling process is assessed, in terms of what technological progress is needed to achieve large-scale, economically competitive production of sustainable fuels by this method.

AB - To improve the sustainability of transportation, a major goal is the replacement of conventional petroleum-based fuels with more sustainable fuels that can be used in the existing infrastructure (fuel distribution and vehicles). While fossil-derived synthetic fuels (e.g. coal derived liquid fuels) and biofuels have received the most attention, similar hydrocarbons can be produced without using fossil fuels or biomass. Using renewable and/or nuclear energy, carbon dioxide and water can be recycled into liquid hydrocarbon fuels in non-biological processes which remove oxygen from CO2 and H 2O (the reverse of fuel combustion). Capture of CO2 from the atmosphere would enable a closed-loop carbon-neutral fuel cycle. This article critically reviews the many possible technological pathways for recycling CO2 into fuels using renewable or nuclear energy, considering three stages-CO2 capture, H2O and CO 2 dissociation, and fuel synthesis. Dissociation methods include thermolysis, thermochemical cycles, electrolysis, and photoelectrolysis of CO2 and/or H2O. High temperature co-electrolysis of H 2O and CO2 makes very efficient use of electricity and heat (near-100% electricity-to-syngas efficiency), provides high reaction rates, and directly produces syngas (CO/H2 mixture) for use in conventional catalytic fuel synthesis reactors. Capturing CO2 from the atmosphere using a solid sorbent, electrolyzing H2O and CO2 in solid oxide electrolysis cells to yield syngas, and converting the syngas to gasoline or diesel by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis is identified as one of the most promising, feasible routes. An analysis of the energy balance and economics of this CO2 recycling process is presented. We estimate that the full system can feasibly operate at 70% electricity-to-liquid fuel efficiency (higher heating value basis) and the price of electricity needed to produce synthetic gasoline at U.S.D$ 2/gal ($ 0.53/L) is 2-3 U.S. cents/kWh. For $ 3/gal ($ 0.78/L) gasoline, electricity at 4-5 cents/kWh is needed. In some regions that have inexpensive renewable electricity, such as Iceland, fuel production may already be economical. The dominant costs of the process are the electricity cost and the capital cost of the electrolyzer, and this capital cost is significantly increased when operating intermittently (on renewable power sources such as solar and wind). The potential of this CO 2 recycling process is assessed, in terms of what technological progress is needed to achieve large-scale, economically competitive production of sustainable fuels by this method.

KW - Carbon dioxide recycling

KW - Economics

KW - Electrolysis

KW - Energy balance

KW - Hydrocarbon fuel

KW - Sustainable fuel

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149409760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149409760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.014

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78149409760

VL - 15

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

JF - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

SN - 1364-0321

IS - 1

ER -