Sustainable Engineering Cognitive Outcomes: Examining Different Approaches for Curriculum Integration

Kevin Ketchman, Claire L A Dancz, Rebekah D. Burke, Kristen Parrish, Amy E. Landis, Melissa M. Bilec

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

As continued globalization of the world's economic, environmental, and societal interactions strains the planet to meet anthropogenic demands, universities are striving to integrate sustainability education into engineering curricula intended to prepare students for global challenges facing today's engineers. Concurrently, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has potential changes related to outcomes related to sustainability. Current practice is to evaluate many student educational outcomes, including those in sustainability, at the end of collegiate careers, primarily through the senior design course. This study compares results from the application of a comprehensive holistic sustainability rubric assessment tool to three years of student projects in two stand-alone sustainable engineering courses and two senior design courses, intended to assess dissimilarities in student outcomes and locate causality, in the context of sustainability. The authors present two potential factors contributing to discrepancies in student outcomes: (1) rubrics do not contain clear elements of sustainability; and (2) senior design course syllabuses are full, and offer strategic approaches to overcoming these barriers institutionally and nationally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number04017002
JournalJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume143
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Curricula
Sustainable development
Students
Accreditation
Planets
Engineering education
Curriculum
Sustainability
Engineers
Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Industrial relations
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Sustainable Engineering Cognitive Outcomes : Examining Different Approaches for Curriculum Integration. / Ketchman, Kevin; Dancz, Claire L A; Burke, Rebekah D.; Parrish, Kristen; Landis, Amy E.; Bilec, Melissa M.

In: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 143, No. 3, 04017002, 01.07.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ketchman, Kevin ; Dancz, Claire L A ; Burke, Rebekah D. ; Parrish, Kristen ; Landis, Amy E. ; Bilec, Melissa M. / Sustainable Engineering Cognitive Outcomes : Examining Different Approaches for Curriculum Integration. In: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 2017 ; Vol. 143, No. 3.
@article{5d678dbc1a7a47f9a50b68f8fd131b39,
title = "Sustainable Engineering Cognitive Outcomes: Examining Different Approaches for Curriculum Integration",
abstract = "As continued globalization of the world's economic, environmental, and societal interactions strains the planet to meet anthropogenic demands, universities are striving to integrate sustainability education into engineering curricula intended to prepare students for global challenges facing today's engineers. Concurrently, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has potential changes related to outcomes related to sustainability. Current practice is to evaluate many student educational outcomes, including those in sustainability, at the end of collegiate careers, primarily through the senior design course. This study compares results from the application of a comprehensive holistic sustainability rubric assessment tool to three years of student projects in two stand-alone sustainable engineering courses and two senior design courses, intended to assess dissimilarities in student outcomes and locate causality, in the context of sustainability. The authors present two potential factors contributing to discrepancies in student outcomes: (1) rubrics do not contain clear elements of sustainability; and (2) senior design course syllabuses are full, and offer strategic approaches to overcoming these barriers institutionally and nationally.",
author = "Kevin Ketchman and Dancz, {Claire L A} and Burke, {Rebekah D.} and Kristen Parrish and Landis, {Amy E.} and Bilec, {Melissa M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000324",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "143",
journal = "Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice",
issn = "1052-3928",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainable Engineering Cognitive Outcomes

T2 - Examining Different Approaches for Curriculum Integration

AU - Ketchman, Kevin

AU - Dancz, Claire L A

AU - Burke, Rebekah D.

AU - Parrish, Kristen

AU - Landis, Amy E.

AU - Bilec, Melissa M.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - As continued globalization of the world's economic, environmental, and societal interactions strains the planet to meet anthropogenic demands, universities are striving to integrate sustainability education into engineering curricula intended to prepare students for global challenges facing today's engineers. Concurrently, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has potential changes related to outcomes related to sustainability. Current practice is to evaluate many student educational outcomes, including those in sustainability, at the end of collegiate careers, primarily through the senior design course. This study compares results from the application of a comprehensive holistic sustainability rubric assessment tool to three years of student projects in two stand-alone sustainable engineering courses and two senior design courses, intended to assess dissimilarities in student outcomes and locate causality, in the context of sustainability. The authors present two potential factors contributing to discrepancies in student outcomes: (1) rubrics do not contain clear elements of sustainability; and (2) senior design course syllabuses are full, and offer strategic approaches to overcoming these barriers institutionally and nationally.

AB - As continued globalization of the world's economic, environmental, and societal interactions strains the planet to meet anthropogenic demands, universities are striving to integrate sustainability education into engineering curricula intended to prepare students for global challenges facing today's engineers. Concurrently, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has potential changes related to outcomes related to sustainability. Current practice is to evaluate many student educational outcomes, including those in sustainability, at the end of collegiate careers, primarily through the senior design course. This study compares results from the application of a comprehensive holistic sustainability rubric assessment tool to three years of student projects in two stand-alone sustainable engineering courses and two senior design courses, intended to assess dissimilarities in student outcomes and locate causality, in the context of sustainability. The authors present two potential factors contributing to discrepancies in student outcomes: (1) rubrics do not contain clear elements of sustainability; and (2) senior design course syllabuses are full, and offer strategic approaches to overcoming these barriers institutionally and nationally.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016102988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016102988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000324

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000324

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016102988

VL - 143

JO - Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

JF - Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

SN - 1052-3928

IS - 3

M1 - 04017002

ER -