Sustainability Potential Analysis (SPA) of landfills - a systemic approach

theoretical considerations

Daniel J. Lang, Roland W. Scholz, Claudia R. Binder, Arnim Wiek, Beat Stäubli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Implementing sustainable development (SD) requires operationalizing this rather vague guiding principle in a socio-technological context. This paper refers to a notion of SD that stresses approaching SD from a systemic perspective. We first present the Function-Structure-Context Framework to appraise if and how systemic characteristics are considered in assessments. The latter framework includes a functional, structural, and contextual dimension, as well as the interdependencies of these dimensions. We then analyze four currently applied landfill assessment methods with respect to this framework: i.e., MCEA (Modified Cost Effectiveness Analysis), LCA (Life Cycle Assessment), RA (Risk Assessment), and TVA (Swiss Technical Ordinance Waste). With respect to the analyzed methods, we can reveal that each of them focuses on specific systemic dimensions in its assessment step, whereas none refers to the whole range of dimensions and interdependencies of the framework presented. We then propose the so-called Sustainability Potential Analysis (SPA) as an alternative comprehensive SD assessment approach, which has the potential to integrate the results of the other methods for achieving a systemic SD assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1628-1638
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume15
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Land fill
Sustainable development
landfill
sustainable development
sustainability
cost analysis
assessment method
Cost effectiveness
risk assessment
Risk assessment
life cycle
analysis
Sustainability
Landfill
Life cycle
method
Interdependencies

Keywords

  • Assessment (RA)
  • Function-Structure-Context Framework
  • Landfill management
  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
  • Method comparison
  • Modified Cost Effectiveness Analysis (MCEA)
  • Sustainability Potential Analysis (SPA)
  • Sustainable development (SD)
  • Systemic perspective

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Pollution
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

Sustainability Potential Analysis (SPA) of landfills - a systemic approach : theoretical considerations. / Lang, Daniel J.; Scholz, Roland W.; Binder, Claudia R.; Wiek, Arnim; Stäubli, Beat.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 15, No. 17, 2007, p. 1628-1638.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lang, Daniel J. ; Scholz, Roland W. ; Binder, Claudia R. ; Wiek, Arnim ; Stäubli, Beat. / Sustainability Potential Analysis (SPA) of landfills - a systemic approach : theoretical considerations. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. 2007 ; Vol. 15, No. 17. pp. 1628-1638.
@article{96f472165a364fc0824d92eaf71f5c9d,
title = "Sustainability Potential Analysis (SPA) of landfills - a systemic approach: theoretical considerations",
abstract = "Implementing sustainable development (SD) requires operationalizing this rather vague guiding principle in a socio-technological context. This paper refers to a notion of SD that stresses approaching SD from a systemic perspective. We first present the Function-Structure-Context Framework to appraise if and how systemic characteristics are considered in assessments. The latter framework includes a functional, structural, and contextual dimension, as well as the interdependencies of these dimensions. We then analyze four currently applied landfill assessment methods with respect to this framework: i.e., MCEA (Modified Cost Effectiveness Analysis), LCA (Life Cycle Assessment), RA (Risk Assessment), and TVA (Swiss Technical Ordinance Waste). With respect to the analyzed methods, we can reveal that each of them focuses on specific systemic dimensions in its assessment step, whereas none refers to the whole range of dimensions and interdependencies of the framework presented. We then propose the so-called Sustainability Potential Analysis (SPA) as an alternative comprehensive SD assessment approach, which has the potential to integrate the results of the other methods for achieving a systemic SD assessment.",
keywords = "Assessment (RA), Function-Structure-Context Framework, Landfill management, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Method comparison, Modified Cost Effectiveness Analysis (MCEA), Sustainability Potential Analysis (SPA), Sustainable development (SD), Systemic perspective",
author = "Lang, {Daniel J.} and Scholz, {Roland W.} and Binder, {Claudia R.} and Arnim Wiek and Beat St{\"a}ubli",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1628--1638",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainability Potential Analysis (SPA) of landfills - a systemic approach

T2 - theoretical considerations

AU - Lang, Daniel J.

AU - Scholz, Roland W.

AU - Binder, Claudia R.

AU - Wiek, Arnim

AU - Stäubli, Beat

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Implementing sustainable development (SD) requires operationalizing this rather vague guiding principle in a socio-technological context. This paper refers to a notion of SD that stresses approaching SD from a systemic perspective. We first present the Function-Structure-Context Framework to appraise if and how systemic characteristics are considered in assessments. The latter framework includes a functional, structural, and contextual dimension, as well as the interdependencies of these dimensions. We then analyze four currently applied landfill assessment methods with respect to this framework: i.e., MCEA (Modified Cost Effectiveness Analysis), LCA (Life Cycle Assessment), RA (Risk Assessment), and TVA (Swiss Technical Ordinance Waste). With respect to the analyzed methods, we can reveal that each of them focuses on specific systemic dimensions in its assessment step, whereas none refers to the whole range of dimensions and interdependencies of the framework presented. We then propose the so-called Sustainability Potential Analysis (SPA) as an alternative comprehensive SD assessment approach, which has the potential to integrate the results of the other methods for achieving a systemic SD assessment.

AB - Implementing sustainable development (SD) requires operationalizing this rather vague guiding principle in a socio-technological context. This paper refers to a notion of SD that stresses approaching SD from a systemic perspective. We first present the Function-Structure-Context Framework to appraise if and how systemic characteristics are considered in assessments. The latter framework includes a functional, structural, and contextual dimension, as well as the interdependencies of these dimensions. We then analyze four currently applied landfill assessment methods with respect to this framework: i.e., MCEA (Modified Cost Effectiveness Analysis), LCA (Life Cycle Assessment), RA (Risk Assessment), and TVA (Swiss Technical Ordinance Waste). With respect to the analyzed methods, we can reveal that each of them focuses on specific systemic dimensions in its assessment step, whereas none refers to the whole range of dimensions and interdependencies of the framework presented. We then propose the so-called Sustainability Potential Analysis (SPA) as an alternative comprehensive SD assessment approach, which has the potential to integrate the results of the other methods for achieving a systemic SD assessment.

KW - Assessment (RA)

KW - Function-Structure-Context Framework

KW - Landfill management

KW - Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

KW - Method comparison

KW - Modified Cost Effectiveness Analysis (MCEA)

KW - Sustainability Potential Analysis (SPA)

KW - Sustainable development (SD)

KW - Systemic perspective

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447289362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447289362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.004

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 1628

EP - 1638

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

IS - 17

ER -