Supreme court auditing of the US courts of appeals: An organizational perspective

Stefanie Lindquist, Susan B. Haire, Donald R. Songer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using an aggregate-level model of Supreme Court-circuit court interactions, this study assesses the extent to which the Court's auditing process of circuit court outputs is shaped by organizational dynamics such as structural capacity, institutionalization, and demographic characteristics. Principals in organizational hierarchies must audit the behavior of their agents to ensure that the agents are faithfully complying with the principals' preferences. In the case of the Supreme Court, such auditing activities must take place in the face of very limited institutional capacity on the Court's part. We propose that the Court considers certain broad organizational and institutional characteristics at the circuit level when performing this task. In particular, we find that the Court strategically allocates its limited institutional resources to audit decisions to respond to its recent interactions with individual circuits in past terms, the circuits' internal decision-making dynamics (including dissent and reversal rates), and goal conflict between the circuit and the Supreme Court.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)607-624
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

auditing
Supreme Court
appeal
audit
interaction
institutionalization
Auditing
decision making
resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Supreme court auditing of the US courts of appeals : An organizational perspective. / Lindquist, Stefanie; Haire, Susan B.; Songer, Donald R.

In: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 17, No. 4, 10.2007, p. 607-624.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9674d46de81542e99e0be4348220f52c,
title = "Supreme court auditing of the US courts of appeals: An organizational perspective",
abstract = "Using an aggregate-level model of Supreme Court-circuit court interactions, this study assesses the extent to which the Court's auditing process of circuit court outputs is shaped by organizational dynamics such as structural capacity, institutionalization, and demographic characteristics. Principals in organizational hierarchies must audit the behavior of their agents to ensure that the agents are faithfully complying with the principals' preferences. In the case of the Supreme Court, such auditing activities must take place in the face of very limited institutional capacity on the Court's part. We propose that the Court considers certain broad organizational and institutional characteristics at the circuit level when performing this task. In particular, we find that the Court strategically allocates its limited institutional resources to audit decisions to respond to its recent interactions with individual circuits in past terms, the circuits' internal decision-making dynamics (including dissent and reversal rates), and goal conflict between the circuit and the Supreme Court.",
author = "Stefanie Lindquist and Haire, {Susan B.} and Songer, {Donald R.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1093/jopart/mul022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "607--624",
journal = "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory",
issn = "1053-1858",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supreme court auditing of the US courts of appeals

T2 - An organizational perspective

AU - Lindquist, Stefanie

AU - Haire, Susan B.

AU - Songer, Donald R.

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Using an aggregate-level model of Supreme Court-circuit court interactions, this study assesses the extent to which the Court's auditing process of circuit court outputs is shaped by organizational dynamics such as structural capacity, institutionalization, and demographic characteristics. Principals in organizational hierarchies must audit the behavior of their agents to ensure that the agents are faithfully complying with the principals' preferences. In the case of the Supreme Court, such auditing activities must take place in the face of very limited institutional capacity on the Court's part. We propose that the Court considers certain broad organizational and institutional characteristics at the circuit level when performing this task. In particular, we find that the Court strategically allocates its limited institutional resources to audit decisions to respond to its recent interactions with individual circuits in past terms, the circuits' internal decision-making dynamics (including dissent and reversal rates), and goal conflict between the circuit and the Supreme Court.

AB - Using an aggregate-level model of Supreme Court-circuit court interactions, this study assesses the extent to which the Court's auditing process of circuit court outputs is shaped by organizational dynamics such as structural capacity, institutionalization, and demographic characteristics. Principals in organizational hierarchies must audit the behavior of their agents to ensure that the agents are faithfully complying with the principals' preferences. In the case of the Supreme Court, such auditing activities must take place in the face of very limited institutional capacity on the Court's part. We propose that the Court considers certain broad organizational and institutional characteristics at the circuit level when performing this task. In particular, we find that the Court strategically allocates its limited institutional resources to audit decisions to respond to its recent interactions with individual circuits in past terms, the circuits' internal decision-making dynamics (including dissent and reversal rates), and goal conflict between the circuit and the Supreme Court.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548777007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548777007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jopart/mul022

DO - 10.1093/jopart/mul022

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34548777007

VL - 17

SP - 607

EP - 624

JO - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

JF - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

SN - 1053-1858

IS - 4

ER -