Abstract

Contracts in grocery supply chains based on Scan-Based Trading (SBT) have recently emerged as alternatives to contracts based on Vendor-Managed Inventory (VMI) as governance mechanisms between retailers and vendors. In contrast to VMI, vendors under SBT remain the owners of inventory delivered to retailers until it is sold to consumers. While SBT contracts offer clear benefits to retailers and suppliers, they also carry unique inventory risks which result from retailers marketing and selling supplier-owned inventory without bearing all the cost of mismanagement. Further risks in both of these arrangements arise from vendors’ contracting out store deliveries to third party logistics (3PL) providers as opposed to taking on the responsibility for deliveries themselves. This paper examines the effect of SBT on inventory shrink relative to VMI using data from a supplier delivering directly to stores using a combination of 3PL and supplier employees. We find that shrink levels tend to be higher under SBT relative to VMI. We also observe that supplier decisions to contract store deliveries out to 3PL providers yield higher shrink levels under SBT and VMI contracts. Based on average inventory replenishment amounts at retail stores, SBT contracts account for 10.20% in shrink relative to VMI contracts. In addition, 3PL contracts account for 2.92% in shrink relative to the amounts observed when the vendor bears responsibility for store deliveries. Our findings highlight potential losses in efficiency in grocery supply chains reflected in higher shrink under SBT and 3PL contracts that may undercut the promised benefits from these arrangements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalDecision Sciences
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Supply chains
Industry
Bearings (structural)
Retail stores
Supply chain contracts
Shrinkage
Grocery retailing
Empirical analysis
Outsourcing
Vendor managed inventory
Logistics
Marketing
Sales
Suppliers
Personnel
Retailers
Vendors
Costs

Keywords

  • Grocery Retailing
  • Inventory Shrinkage
  • Scan-Based Trading
  • Vendor-Managed Inventory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{56f8162357c94643b8372c7df5f3cff3,
title = "Supply Chain Contracts and Inventory Shrinkage: An Empirical Analysis in the Grocery Retailing Industry",
abstract = "Contracts in grocery supply chains based on Scan-Based Trading (SBT) have recently emerged as alternatives to contracts based on Vendor-Managed Inventory (VMI) as governance mechanisms between retailers and vendors. In contrast to VMI, vendors under SBT remain the owners of inventory delivered to retailers until it is sold to consumers. While SBT contracts offer clear benefits to retailers and suppliers, they also carry unique inventory risks which result from retailers marketing and selling supplier-owned inventory without bearing all the cost of mismanagement. Further risks in both of these arrangements arise from vendors’ contracting out store deliveries to third party logistics (3PL) providers as opposed to taking on the responsibility for deliveries themselves. This paper examines the effect of SBT on inventory shrink relative to VMI using data from a supplier delivering directly to stores using a combination of 3PL and supplier employees. We find that shrink levels tend to be higher under SBT relative to VMI. We also observe that supplier decisions to contract store deliveries out to 3PL providers yield higher shrink levels under SBT and VMI contracts. Based on average inventory replenishment amounts at retail stores, SBT contracts account for 10.20{\%} in shrink relative to VMI contracts. In addition, 3PL contracts account for 2.92{\%} in shrink relative to the amounts observed when the vendor bears responsibility for store deliveries. Our findings highlight potential losses in efficiency in grocery supply chains reflected in higher shrink under SBT and 3PL contracts that may undercut the promised benefits from these arrangements.",
keywords = "Grocery Retailing, Inventory Shrinkage, Scan-Based Trading, Vendor-Managed Inventory",
author = "Min Choi and Elliot Rabinovich and Timothy Richards",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/deci.12356",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Decision Sciences",
issn = "0011-7315",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supply Chain Contracts and Inventory Shrinkage

T2 - An Empirical Analysis in the Grocery Retailing Industry

AU - Choi, Min

AU - Rabinovich, Elliot

AU - Richards, Timothy

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Contracts in grocery supply chains based on Scan-Based Trading (SBT) have recently emerged as alternatives to contracts based on Vendor-Managed Inventory (VMI) as governance mechanisms between retailers and vendors. In contrast to VMI, vendors under SBT remain the owners of inventory delivered to retailers until it is sold to consumers. While SBT contracts offer clear benefits to retailers and suppliers, they also carry unique inventory risks which result from retailers marketing and selling supplier-owned inventory without bearing all the cost of mismanagement. Further risks in both of these arrangements arise from vendors’ contracting out store deliveries to third party logistics (3PL) providers as opposed to taking on the responsibility for deliveries themselves. This paper examines the effect of SBT on inventory shrink relative to VMI using data from a supplier delivering directly to stores using a combination of 3PL and supplier employees. We find that shrink levels tend to be higher under SBT relative to VMI. We also observe that supplier decisions to contract store deliveries out to 3PL providers yield higher shrink levels under SBT and VMI contracts. Based on average inventory replenishment amounts at retail stores, SBT contracts account for 10.20% in shrink relative to VMI contracts. In addition, 3PL contracts account for 2.92% in shrink relative to the amounts observed when the vendor bears responsibility for store deliveries. Our findings highlight potential losses in efficiency in grocery supply chains reflected in higher shrink under SBT and 3PL contracts that may undercut the promised benefits from these arrangements.

AB - Contracts in grocery supply chains based on Scan-Based Trading (SBT) have recently emerged as alternatives to contracts based on Vendor-Managed Inventory (VMI) as governance mechanisms between retailers and vendors. In contrast to VMI, vendors under SBT remain the owners of inventory delivered to retailers until it is sold to consumers. While SBT contracts offer clear benefits to retailers and suppliers, they also carry unique inventory risks which result from retailers marketing and selling supplier-owned inventory without bearing all the cost of mismanagement. Further risks in both of these arrangements arise from vendors’ contracting out store deliveries to third party logistics (3PL) providers as opposed to taking on the responsibility for deliveries themselves. This paper examines the effect of SBT on inventory shrink relative to VMI using data from a supplier delivering directly to stores using a combination of 3PL and supplier employees. We find that shrink levels tend to be higher under SBT relative to VMI. We also observe that supplier decisions to contract store deliveries out to 3PL providers yield higher shrink levels under SBT and VMI contracts. Based on average inventory replenishment amounts at retail stores, SBT contracts account for 10.20% in shrink relative to VMI contracts. In addition, 3PL contracts account for 2.92% in shrink relative to the amounts observed when the vendor bears responsibility for store deliveries. Our findings highlight potential losses in efficiency in grocery supply chains reflected in higher shrink under SBT and 3PL contracts that may undercut the promised benefits from these arrangements.

KW - Grocery Retailing

KW - Inventory Shrinkage

KW - Scan-Based Trading

KW - Vendor-Managed Inventory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060055350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060055350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/deci.12356

DO - 10.1111/deci.12356

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060055350

JO - Decision Sciences

JF - Decision Sciences

SN - 0011-7315

ER -