Supplier non-retention post disruption

What role does anger play?

Mikaella Polyviou, M. Johnny Rungtusanatham, Rebecca W. Reczek, A. Michael Knemeyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We analyze the direct and indirect effects of two critical-component supply-disruption attributes (CONTROLLABILITY and RESPONSIBILITY) on supplier non-retention post disruption. Using a scenario-based role-playing experiment with 253 purchasing professionals, we find that the likelihood that a recovery lead (i.e., the individual assigned to the disruption-recovery task) recommends non-retention of an incumbent critical-component supplier post disruption is higher when the recovery lead perceives that the supplier, rather than nature, had control over the supply disruption. Moreover, this direct effect is partially explained by the amount of ANGER that the recovery lead feels due to the supply disruption. Neither the direct nor the indirect effect of RESPONSIBILITY on supplier non-retention post disruption is, however, detected. This paper is among the first to offer theoretical and empirical evidence that supplier non-retention in a supply-disruption context is a function of who had control over the supply disruption. Furthermore, this paper considers the effects of emotions and illustrates that supply-management decisions are not based solely on rational (i.e., cognitive) processes but also on emotional processes. Finally, this paper challenges conceptual arguments about the association between supplier selection and retention, at least in the supply-disruption context and with regard to the individual participating in both tasks. Our findings also have several managerial implications for supplying and buying firms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Operations Management
Volume61
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Recovery
Lead
Purchasing
Anger
Disruption
Supply disruption
Suppliers
Experiments
Direct effect
Emotion
Indirect effects

Keywords

  • Anger
  • Scenario-based role-playing experiment
  • Supplier non-retention
  • Supply disruptions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Supplier non-retention post disruption : What role does anger play? / Polyviou, Mikaella; Rungtusanatham, M. Johnny; Reczek, Rebecca W.; Knemeyer, A. Michael.

In: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 61, 01.07.2018, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Polyviou, Mikaella ; Rungtusanatham, M. Johnny ; Reczek, Rebecca W. ; Knemeyer, A. Michael. / Supplier non-retention post disruption : What role does anger play?. In: Journal of Operations Management. 2018 ; Vol. 61. pp. 1-14.
@article{9c8b4706d9c64e59a8cb7a0ca21d41a4,
title = "Supplier non-retention post disruption: What role does anger play?",
abstract = "We analyze the direct and indirect effects of two critical-component supply-disruption attributes (CONTROLLABILITY and RESPONSIBILITY) on supplier non-retention post disruption. Using a scenario-based role-playing experiment with 253 purchasing professionals, we find that the likelihood that a recovery lead (i.e., the individual assigned to the disruption-recovery task) recommends non-retention of an incumbent critical-component supplier post disruption is higher when the recovery lead perceives that the supplier, rather than nature, had control over the supply disruption. Moreover, this direct effect is partially explained by the amount of ANGER that the recovery lead feels due to the supply disruption. Neither the direct nor the indirect effect of RESPONSIBILITY on supplier non-retention post disruption is, however, detected. This paper is among the first to offer theoretical and empirical evidence that supplier non-retention in a supply-disruption context is a function of who had control over the supply disruption. Furthermore, this paper considers the effects of emotions and illustrates that supply-management decisions are not based solely on rational (i.e., cognitive) processes but also on emotional processes. Finally, this paper challenges conceptual arguments about the association between supplier selection and retention, at least in the supply-disruption context and with regard to the individual participating in both tasks. Our findings also have several managerial implications for supplying and buying firms.",
keywords = "Anger, Scenario-based role-playing experiment, Supplier non-retention, Supply disruptions",
author = "Mikaella Polyviou and Rungtusanatham, {M. Johnny} and Reczek, {Rebecca W.} and Knemeyer, {A. Michael}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jom.2018.07.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Journal of Operations Management",
issn = "0272-6963",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supplier non-retention post disruption

T2 - What role does anger play?

AU - Polyviou, Mikaella

AU - Rungtusanatham, M. Johnny

AU - Reczek, Rebecca W.

AU - Knemeyer, A. Michael

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - We analyze the direct and indirect effects of two critical-component supply-disruption attributes (CONTROLLABILITY and RESPONSIBILITY) on supplier non-retention post disruption. Using a scenario-based role-playing experiment with 253 purchasing professionals, we find that the likelihood that a recovery lead (i.e., the individual assigned to the disruption-recovery task) recommends non-retention of an incumbent critical-component supplier post disruption is higher when the recovery lead perceives that the supplier, rather than nature, had control over the supply disruption. Moreover, this direct effect is partially explained by the amount of ANGER that the recovery lead feels due to the supply disruption. Neither the direct nor the indirect effect of RESPONSIBILITY on supplier non-retention post disruption is, however, detected. This paper is among the first to offer theoretical and empirical evidence that supplier non-retention in a supply-disruption context is a function of who had control over the supply disruption. Furthermore, this paper considers the effects of emotions and illustrates that supply-management decisions are not based solely on rational (i.e., cognitive) processes but also on emotional processes. Finally, this paper challenges conceptual arguments about the association between supplier selection and retention, at least in the supply-disruption context and with regard to the individual participating in both tasks. Our findings also have several managerial implications for supplying and buying firms.

AB - We analyze the direct and indirect effects of two critical-component supply-disruption attributes (CONTROLLABILITY and RESPONSIBILITY) on supplier non-retention post disruption. Using a scenario-based role-playing experiment with 253 purchasing professionals, we find that the likelihood that a recovery lead (i.e., the individual assigned to the disruption-recovery task) recommends non-retention of an incumbent critical-component supplier post disruption is higher when the recovery lead perceives that the supplier, rather than nature, had control over the supply disruption. Moreover, this direct effect is partially explained by the amount of ANGER that the recovery lead feels due to the supply disruption. Neither the direct nor the indirect effect of RESPONSIBILITY on supplier non-retention post disruption is, however, detected. This paper is among the first to offer theoretical and empirical evidence that supplier non-retention in a supply-disruption context is a function of who had control over the supply disruption. Furthermore, this paper considers the effects of emotions and illustrates that supply-management decisions are not based solely on rational (i.e., cognitive) processes but also on emotional processes. Finally, this paper challenges conceptual arguments about the association between supplier selection and retention, at least in the supply-disruption context and with regard to the individual participating in both tasks. Our findings also have several managerial implications for supplying and buying firms.

KW - Anger

KW - Scenario-based role-playing experiment

KW - Supplier non-retention

KW - Supply disruptions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049888028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049888028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jom.2018.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jom.2018.07.001

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Journal of Operations Management

JF - Journal of Operations Management

SN - 0272-6963

ER -