Supernova fallback

A possible site for the r-process

Christopher L. Fryer, Falk Herwig, Aimee Hungerford, Francis Timmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The conditions for the leading r-process site candidate, neutrino-driven winds, cannot be reproduced self-consistently in current supernova models. For that reason, we investigate an alternate model involving the mass ejected by fallback in a supernova explosion, through hydrodynamic and nucleosynthesis calculations. The nucleosynthetic products of this ejected material produce r-process elements, including those in the vicinity of the elusive third peak at mass number 195.9 Trans-iron element production beyond the second peak is made possible by a rapid (<1 ms) freezeout of α-particles that leaves behind a large nucleon (including protons!) to r-process seed ratio. This rapid phase is followed by a relatively long (≳ 15 ms) simmering phase at ∼2 × 10 K, which is the thermodynamic consequence of the hydrodynamic trajectory of the turbulent flows in the fallback outburst. During the slow phase, high-mass elements beyond the second peak are first made through rapid capture of both protons and neutrons. The flow stays close to the valley of stability during this phase. After freezeout of protons the remaining neutrons cause a shift out to short-lived isotopes, as is typical for the r-process. A low electron fraction, is not required in this model; however, the detailed final distribution is sensitive to the electron fraction. Our simulations suggest that supernova fallback is a viable alternative scenario for the r-process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume646
Issue number2 II
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2006

Fingerprint

supernovae
protons
hydrodynamics
neutrons
electron
guy wires
turbulent flow
nuclear fusion
outburst
leaves
valleys
explosions
explosion
seeds
electrons
neutrinos
isotopes
thermodynamics
trajectory
trajectories

Keywords

  • Nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances
  • Supernovae: general

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Supernova fallback : A possible site for the r-process. / Fryer, Christopher L.; Herwig, Falk; Hungerford, Aimee; Timmes, Francis.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 646, No. 2 II, 01.08.2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fryer, Christopher L. ; Herwig, Falk ; Hungerford, Aimee ; Timmes, Francis. / Supernova fallback : A possible site for the r-process. In: Astrophysical Journal. 2006 ; Vol. 646, No. 2 II.
@article{939cc9c929c945f3b0d14f6987794484,
title = "Supernova fallback: A possible site for the r-process",
abstract = "The conditions for the leading r-process site candidate, neutrino-driven winds, cannot be reproduced self-consistently in current supernova models. For that reason, we investigate an alternate model involving the mass ejected by fallback in a supernova explosion, through hydrodynamic and nucleosynthesis calculations. The nucleosynthetic products of this ejected material produce r-process elements, including those in the vicinity of the elusive third peak at mass number 195.9 Trans-iron element production beyond the second peak is made possible by a rapid (<1 ms) freezeout of α-particles that leaves behind a large nucleon (including protons!) to r-process seed ratio. This rapid phase is followed by a relatively long (≳ 15 ms) simmering phase at ∼2 × 10 K, which is the thermodynamic consequence of the hydrodynamic trajectory of the turbulent flows in the fallback outburst. During the slow phase, high-mass elements beyond the second peak are first made through rapid capture of both protons and neutrons. The flow stays close to the valley of stability during this phase. After freezeout of protons the remaining neutrons cause a shift out to short-lived isotopes, as is typical for the r-process. A low electron fraction, is not required in this model; however, the detailed final distribution is sensitive to the electron fraction. Our simulations suggest that supernova fallback is a viable alternative scenario for the r-process.",
keywords = "Nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances, Supernovae: general",
author = "Fryer, {Christopher L.} and Falk Herwig and Aimee Hungerford and Francis Timmes",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/507071",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "646",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2 II",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supernova fallback

T2 - A possible site for the r-process

AU - Fryer, Christopher L.

AU - Herwig, Falk

AU - Hungerford, Aimee

AU - Timmes, Francis

PY - 2006/8/1

Y1 - 2006/8/1

N2 - The conditions for the leading r-process site candidate, neutrino-driven winds, cannot be reproduced self-consistently in current supernova models. For that reason, we investigate an alternate model involving the mass ejected by fallback in a supernova explosion, through hydrodynamic and nucleosynthesis calculations. The nucleosynthetic products of this ejected material produce r-process elements, including those in the vicinity of the elusive third peak at mass number 195.9 Trans-iron element production beyond the second peak is made possible by a rapid (<1 ms) freezeout of α-particles that leaves behind a large nucleon (including protons!) to r-process seed ratio. This rapid phase is followed by a relatively long (≳ 15 ms) simmering phase at ∼2 × 10 K, which is the thermodynamic consequence of the hydrodynamic trajectory of the turbulent flows in the fallback outburst. During the slow phase, high-mass elements beyond the second peak are first made through rapid capture of both protons and neutrons. The flow stays close to the valley of stability during this phase. After freezeout of protons the remaining neutrons cause a shift out to short-lived isotopes, as is typical for the r-process. A low electron fraction, is not required in this model; however, the detailed final distribution is sensitive to the electron fraction. Our simulations suggest that supernova fallback is a viable alternative scenario for the r-process.

AB - The conditions for the leading r-process site candidate, neutrino-driven winds, cannot be reproduced self-consistently in current supernova models. For that reason, we investigate an alternate model involving the mass ejected by fallback in a supernova explosion, through hydrodynamic and nucleosynthesis calculations. The nucleosynthetic products of this ejected material produce r-process elements, including those in the vicinity of the elusive third peak at mass number 195.9 Trans-iron element production beyond the second peak is made possible by a rapid (<1 ms) freezeout of α-particles that leaves behind a large nucleon (including protons!) to r-process seed ratio. This rapid phase is followed by a relatively long (≳ 15 ms) simmering phase at ∼2 × 10 K, which is the thermodynamic consequence of the hydrodynamic trajectory of the turbulent flows in the fallback outburst. During the slow phase, high-mass elements beyond the second peak are first made through rapid capture of both protons and neutrons. The flow stays close to the valley of stability during this phase. After freezeout of protons the remaining neutrons cause a shift out to short-lived isotopes, as is typical for the r-process. A low electron fraction, is not required in this model; however, the detailed final distribution is sensitive to the electron fraction. Our simulations suggest that supernova fallback is a viable alternative scenario for the r-process.

KW - Nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances

KW - Supernovae: general

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748050772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748050772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/507071

DO - 10.1086/507071

M3 - Article

VL - 646

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 2 II

ER -