Suicide bombing as acts of deathly citizenship? A critical double-layered inquiry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While prevailing terrorism research often asks what we can do to eliminate the threat of suicide terrorism, this article switches the question by asking: what problems might the agency manifested in suicide bombing (even if unlawful and irresponsible) solve for us? In critiquing the sociological positivist approach that seeks to uncover the causes of suicide terrorism – and in the process reveals a hidden ideology that sustains the binary of ‘democracy’ versus ‘terrorism,’ and portrays the latter as a threat to the former – I extend upon the legacy of Fanonian violence to conduct a critical double-layered inquiry in connecting suicide bombing to the agency of citizenship. In the first, political layer of inquiry, I borrow from the works of social theorists Engin Isin and Melanie White in arguing that suicide bombing in the Palestinian situation can be read as a moment of ‘acts of deathly citizenship’. However, by pointing to three insufficiencies in the first layer of analysis – the role of rationality, the role of the quotidian, and the role of subculture – I argue for the need of a second, cultural layer of inquiry that looks at suicide bombing not only as a momentary political act, but as a sustained and permeating ‘subcultural script’ of deathly citizenship that challenges the liberal national script founded on the individual pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-163
Number of pages17
JournalCritical Studies on Terrorism
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

suicide
citizenship
terrorism
threat
subculture
happiness
rationality
ideology
violence
democracy
cause

Keywords

  • Acts
  • Agency
  • Citizenship
  • Cultural
  • Palestine
  • Political
  • Script
  • Subculture
  • Suicide bombing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Suicide bombing as acts of deathly citizenship? A critical double-layered inquiry. / Lee, Charles.

In: Critical Studies on Terrorism, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2009, p. 147-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a90fe49e3f1427fb990332a728054d7,
title = "Suicide bombing as acts of deathly citizenship? A critical double-layered inquiry",
abstract = "While prevailing terrorism research often asks what we can do to eliminate the threat of suicide terrorism, this article switches the question by asking: what problems might the agency manifested in suicide bombing (even if unlawful and irresponsible) solve for us? In critiquing the sociological positivist approach that seeks to uncover the causes of suicide terrorism – and in the process reveals a hidden ideology that sustains the binary of ‘democracy’ versus ‘terrorism,’ and portrays the latter as a threat to the former – I extend upon the legacy of Fanonian violence to conduct a critical double-layered inquiry in connecting suicide bombing to the agency of citizenship. In the first, political layer of inquiry, I borrow from the works of social theorists Engin Isin and Melanie White in arguing that suicide bombing in the Palestinian situation can be read as a moment of ‘acts of deathly citizenship’. However, by pointing to three insufficiencies in the first layer of analysis – the role of rationality, the role of the quotidian, and the role of subculture – I argue for the need of a second, cultural layer of inquiry that looks at suicide bombing not only as a momentary political act, but as a sustained and permeating ‘subcultural script’ of deathly citizenship that challenges the liberal national script founded on the individual pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness.",
keywords = "Acts, Agency, Citizenship, Cultural, Palestine, Political, Script, Subculture, Suicide bombing",
author = "Charles Lee",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/17539150903010236",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "147--163",
journal = "Critical Studies on Terrorism",
issn = "1753-9153",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Suicide bombing as acts of deathly citizenship? A critical double-layered inquiry

AU - Lee, Charles

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - While prevailing terrorism research often asks what we can do to eliminate the threat of suicide terrorism, this article switches the question by asking: what problems might the agency manifested in suicide bombing (even if unlawful and irresponsible) solve for us? In critiquing the sociological positivist approach that seeks to uncover the causes of suicide terrorism – and in the process reveals a hidden ideology that sustains the binary of ‘democracy’ versus ‘terrorism,’ and portrays the latter as a threat to the former – I extend upon the legacy of Fanonian violence to conduct a critical double-layered inquiry in connecting suicide bombing to the agency of citizenship. In the first, political layer of inquiry, I borrow from the works of social theorists Engin Isin and Melanie White in arguing that suicide bombing in the Palestinian situation can be read as a moment of ‘acts of deathly citizenship’. However, by pointing to three insufficiencies in the first layer of analysis – the role of rationality, the role of the quotidian, and the role of subculture – I argue for the need of a second, cultural layer of inquiry that looks at suicide bombing not only as a momentary political act, but as a sustained and permeating ‘subcultural script’ of deathly citizenship that challenges the liberal national script founded on the individual pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness.

AB - While prevailing terrorism research often asks what we can do to eliminate the threat of suicide terrorism, this article switches the question by asking: what problems might the agency manifested in suicide bombing (even if unlawful and irresponsible) solve for us? In critiquing the sociological positivist approach that seeks to uncover the causes of suicide terrorism – and in the process reveals a hidden ideology that sustains the binary of ‘democracy’ versus ‘terrorism,’ and portrays the latter as a threat to the former – I extend upon the legacy of Fanonian violence to conduct a critical double-layered inquiry in connecting suicide bombing to the agency of citizenship. In the first, political layer of inquiry, I borrow from the works of social theorists Engin Isin and Melanie White in arguing that suicide bombing in the Palestinian situation can be read as a moment of ‘acts of deathly citizenship’. However, by pointing to three insufficiencies in the first layer of analysis – the role of rationality, the role of the quotidian, and the role of subculture – I argue for the need of a second, cultural layer of inquiry that looks at suicide bombing not only as a momentary political act, but as a sustained and permeating ‘subcultural script’ of deathly citizenship that challenges the liberal national script founded on the individual pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness.

KW - Acts

KW - Agency

KW - Citizenship

KW - Cultural

KW - Palestine

KW - Political

KW - Script

KW - Subculture

KW - Suicide bombing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009930827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009930827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17539150903010236

DO - 10.1080/17539150903010236

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85009930827

VL - 2

SP - 147

EP - 163

JO - Critical Studies on Terrorism

JF - Critical Studies on Terrorism

SN - 1753-9153

IS - 2

ER -