Success Bias and Inflation Bias After Planning and Communicating Emotional Support

Colter D. Ray, Kory Floyd, Paul Mongeau, Ashley Randall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study investigates the potential for cancer patients’ supporters to experience cognitive biases after communicating emotional support messages. A success bias was predicted, such that those who planned their messages would rate those messages as more effective in comparison with those who did not plan their messages (H1a-H1c). An inflation bias was also predicted, such that supporters would rate their messages as more effective than cancer patients who also rated the messages (H2a-H2c). One hundred laboratory participants were randomly assigned to a planning or distraction task before recording an emotional support message for a friend who had hypothetically been diagnosed with cancer. Laboratory participants rated their own messages in terms of relational assurances, problem-solving utility, and emotional awareness. Subsequently, cancer patients viewed and rated the laboratory participants’ messages on the same characteristics. Participants who planned their messages rated their messages significantly higher than those who did not plan their messages in terms of relational assurance and problem-solving utility but not emotional awareness. Irrespective of planning or distraction condition, participants also rated their messages significantly higher on all three dependent variables than did cancer patients. Supporters should be aware of the propensity to overrate their supportive abilities and guard against the assumption that planning messages results in more effective support messages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Cancer Education
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Economic Inflation
Neoplasms
Aptitude

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Cognitive bias
  • Emotional support
  • Inflation bias
  • Message planning
  • Oncology
  • Success bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Success Bias and Inflation Bias After Planning and Communicating Emotional Support. / Ray, Colter D.; Floyd, Kory; Mongeau, Paul; Randall, Ashley.

In: Journal of Cancer Education, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e4136cf9e3d4b2cb5fad198101e80e3,
title = "Success Bias and Inflation Bias After Planning and Communicating Emotional Support",
abstract = "This study investigates the potential for cancer patients’ supporters to experience cognitive biases after communicating emotional support messages. A success bias was predicted, such that those who planned their messages would rate those messages as more effective in comparison with those who did not plan their messages (H1a-H1c). An inflation bias was also predicted, such that supporters would rate their messages as more effective than cancer patients who also rated the messages (H2a-H2c). One hundred laboratory participants were randomly assigned to a planning or distraction task before recording an emotional support message for a friend who had hypothetically been diagnosed with cancer. Laboratory participants rated their own messages in terms of relational assurances, problem-solving utility, and emotional awareness. Subsequently, cancer patients viewed and rated the laboratory participants’ messages on the same characteristics. Participants who planned their messages rated their messages significantly higher than those who did not plan their messages in terms of relational assurance and problem-solving utility but not emotional awareness. Irrespective of planning or distraction condition, participants also rated their messages significantly higher on all three dependent variables than did cancer patients. Supporters should be aware of the propensity to overrate their supportive abilities and guard against the assumption that planning messages results in more effective support messages.",
keywords = "Cancer, Cognitive bias, Emotional support, Inflation bias, Message planning, Oncology, Success bias",
author = "Ray, {Colter D.} and Kory Floyd and Paul Mongeau and Ashley Randall",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13187-019-01550-1",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Cancer Education",
issn = "0885-8195",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Success Bias and Inflation Bias After Planning and Communicating Emotional Support

AU - Ray, Colter D.

AU - Floyd, Kory

AU - Mongeau, Paul

AU - Randall, Ashley

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This study investigates the potential for cancer patients’ supporters to experience cognitive biases after communicating emotional support messages. A success bias was predicted, such that those who planned their messages would rate those messages as more effective in comparison with those who did not plan their messages (H1a-H1c). An inflation bias was also predicted, such that supporters would rate their messages as more effective than cancer patients who also rated the messages (H2a-H2c). One hundred laboratory participants were randomly assigned to a planning or distraction task before recording an emotional support message for a friend who had hypothetically been diagnosed with cancer. Laboratory participants rated their own messages in terms of relational assurances, problem-solving utility, and emotional awareness. Subsequently, cancer patients viewed and rated the laboratory participants’ messages on the same characteristics. Participants who planned their messages rated their messages significantly higher than those who did not plan their messages in terms of relational assurance and problem-solving utility but not emotional awareness. Irrespective of planning or distraction condition, participants also rated their messages significantly higher on all three dependent variables than did cancer patients. Supporters should be aware of the propensity to overrate their supportive abilities and guard against the assumption that planning messages results in more effective support messages.

AB - This study investigates the potential for cancer patients’ supporters to experience cognitive biases after communicating emotional support messages. A success bias was predicted, such that those who planned their messages would rate those messages as more effective in comparison with those who did not plan their messages (H1a-H1c). An inflation bias was also predicted, such that supporters would rate their messages as more effective than cancer patients who also rated the messages (H2a-H2c). One hundred laboratory participants were randomly assigned to a planning or distraction task before recording an emotional support message for a friend who had hypothetically been diagnosed with cancer. Laboratory participants rated their own messages in terms of relational assurances, problem-solving utility, and emotional awareness. Subsequently, cancer patients viewed and rated the laboratory participants’ messages on the same characteristics. Participants who planned their messages rated their messages significantly higher than those who did not plan their messages in terms of relational assurance and problem-solving utility but not emotional awareness. Irrespective of planning or distraction condition, participants also rated their messages significantly higher on all three dependent variables than did cancer patients. Supporters should be aware of the propensity to overrate their supportive abilities and guard against the assumption that planning messages results in more effective support messages.

KW - Cancer

KW - Cognitive bias

KW - Emotional support

KW - Inflation bias

KW - Message planning

KW - Oncology

KW - Success bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066631324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066631324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13187-019-01550-1

DO - 10.1007/s13187-019-01550-1

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Cancer Education

JF - Journal of Cancer Education

SN - 0885-8195

ER -