Subsystems, flowpaths, and the spatial variability of nitrogen in a fluvial ecosystem

David Bruce Lewis, Nancy Grimm, Tamara K. Harms, John D. Schade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nutrient dynamics in rivers affect biogeochemical fluxes from land to oceans and the atmosphere. Fluvial ecosystems are thus important environments for understanding spatial variability in nutrient concentrations. At the San Pedro River in semi-arid Arizona, USA, we investigated how variability in dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) was regulated by subsystem type and hydrological flowpaths. The three subsystems we compared were the riparian zone, parafluvial (gravel bar) zone, and surface stream. DIN concentration was greater in the riparian zone than in the surface stream, suggesting that the riparian zone retains DIN and is a source of N for the surface stream. Parafluvial zones were too variable to generalize how they regulate DIN. Our hypothesis that subsystem type regulates DIN oxidation was too simple. The riparian and parafluvial zones host a mosaic of oxidizing and reducing conditions, as they exhibited highly variable ammonium to nitrate (NH 4 +:NO 3 - ) ratios. Surface stream DIN was dominated by NO 3 - . Along a subsurface flowpath in the riparian zone, we did not observe spatial covariation among the N forms and transformations involved in mineralization. We also compared spatial variability in solute concentrations between flowpaths and non-flowpath reference areas. Our mixed results suggest that spatial variability is regulated in part by flowpaths, but also by solute-specific processing length along a flowpath. To understand the distribution of N in fluvial ecosystems, subsystem type and flowpaths are readily discernable guides, but they should be coupled with other mechanistic factors such as biota and soil type.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)911-924
Number of pages14
JournalLandscape Ecology
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

dissolved inorganic nitrogen
subsystem
riparian zone
ecosystem
nitrogen
solute
river
nutrient dynamics
soil type
biota
gravel
ammonium
mineralization
nitrate
oxidation
atmosphere
nutrient
ocean

Keywords

  • Biogeochemistry
  • Dissolved oxygen
  • Ecosystem function
  • Fluvial ecosystem
  • Flux
  • Heterogeneity
  • Landscape
  • Nitrogen
  • Nutrient cycling
  • Nutrient retention
  • Southwest
  • Stream

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Subsystems, flowpaths, and the spatial variability of nitrogen in a fluvial ecosystem. / Lewis, David Bruce; Grimm, Nancy; Harms, Tamara K.; Schade, John D.

In: Landscape Ecology, Vol. 22, No. 6, 07.2007, p. 911-924.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewis, David Bruce ; Grimm, Nancy ; Harms, Tamara K. ; Schade, John D. / Subsystems, flowpaths, and the spatial variability of nitrogen in a fluvial ecosystem. In: Landscape Ecology. 2007 ; Vol. 22, No. 6. pp. 911-924.
@article{adeb5353f18441df9a509416da1a275f,
title = "Subsystems, flowpaths, and the spatial variability of nitrogen in a fluvial ecosystem",
abstract = "Nutrient dynamics in rivers affect biogeochemical fluxes from land to oceans and the atmosphere. Fluvial ecosystems are thus important environments for understanding spatial variability in nutrient concentrations. At the San Pedro River in semi-arid Arizona, USA, we investigated how variability in dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) was regulated by subsystem type and hydrological flowpaths. The three subsystems we compared were the riparian zone, parafluvial (gravel bar) zone, and surface stream. DIN concentration was greater in the riparian zone than in the surface stream, suggesting that the riparian zone retains DIN and is a source of N for the surface stream. Parafluvial zones were too variable to generalize how they regulate DIN. Our hypothesis that subsystem type regulates DIN oxidation was too simple. The riparian and parafluvial zones host a mosaic of oxidizing and reducing conditions, as they exhibited highly variable ammonium to nitrate (NH 4 +:NO 3 - ) ratios. Surface stream DIN was dominated by NO 3 - . Along a subsurface flowpath in the riparian zone, we did not observe spatial covariation among the N forms and transformations involved in mineralization. We also compared spatial variability in solute concentrations between flowpaths and non-flowpath reference areas. Our mixed results suggest that spatial variability is regulated in part by flowpaths, but also by solute-specific processing length along a flowpath. To understand the distribution of N in fluvial ecosystems, subsystem type and flowpaths are readily discernable guides, but they should be coupled with other mechanistic factors such as biota and soil type.",
keywords = "Biogeochemistry, Dissolved oxygen, Ecosystem function, Fluvial ecosystem, Flux, Heterogeneity, Landscape, Nitrogen, Nutrient cycling, Nutrient retention, Southwest, Stream",
author = "Lewis, {David Bruce} and Nancy Grimm and Harms, {Tamara K.} and Schade, {John D.}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s10980-007-9078-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "911--924",
journal = "Landscape Ecology",
issn = "0921-2973",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subsystems, flowpaths, and the spatial variability of nitrogen in a fluvial ecosystem

AU - Lewis, David Bruce

AU - Grimm, Nancy

AU - Harms, Tamara K.

AU - Schade, John D.

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Nutrient dynamics in rivers affect biogeochemical fluxes from land to oceans and the atmosphere. Fluvial ecosystems are thus important environments for understanding spatial variability in nutrient concentrations. At the San Pedro River in semi-arid Arizona, USA, we investigated how variability in dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) was regulated by subsystem type and hydrological flowpaths. The three subsystems we compared were the riparian zone, parafluvial (gravel bar) zone, and surface stream. DIN concentration was greater in the riparian zone than in the surface stream, suggesting that the riparian zone retains DIN and is a source of N for the surface stream. Parafluvial zones were too variable to generalize how they regulate DIN. Our hypothesis that subsystem type regulates DIN oxidation was too simple. The riparian and parafluvial zones host a mosaic of oxidizing and reducing conditions, as they exhibited highly variable ammonium to nitrate (NH 4 +:NO 3 - ) ratios. Surface stream DIN was dominated by NO 3 - . Along a subsurface flowpath in the riparian zone, we did not observe spatial covariation among the N forms and transformations involved in mineralization. We also compared spatial variability in solute concentrations between flowpaths and non-flowpath reference areas. Our mixed results suggest that spatial variability is regulated in part by flowpaths, but also by solute-specific processing length along a flowpath. To understand the distribution of N in fluvial ecosystems, subsystem type and flowpaths are readily discernable guides, but they should be coupled with other mechanistic factors such as biota and soil type.

AB - Nutrient dynamics in rivers affect biogeochemical fluxes from land to oceans and the atmosphere. Fluvial ecosystems are thus important environments for understanding spatial variability in nutrient concentrations. At the San Pedro River in semi-arid Arizona, USA, we investigated how variability in dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) was regulated by subsystem type and hydrological flowpaths. The three subsystems we compared were the riparian zone, parafluvial (gravel bar) zone, and surface stream. DIN concentration was greater in the riparian zone than in the surface stream, suggesting that the riparian zone retains DIN and is a source of N for the surface stream. Parafluvial zones were too variable to generalize how they regulate DIN. Our hypothesis that subsystem type regulates DIN oxidation was too simple. The riparian and parafluvial zones host a mosaic of oxidizing and reducing conditions, as they exhibited highly variable ammonium to nitrate (NH 4 +:NO 3 - ) ratios. Surface stream DIN was dominated by NO 3 - . Along a subsurface flowpath in the riparian zone, we did not observe spatial covariation among the N forms and transformations involved in mineralization. We also compared spatial variability in solute concentrations between flowpaths and non-flowpath reference areas. Our mixed results suggest that spatial variability is regulated in part by flowpaths, but also by solute-specific processing length along a flowpath. To understand the distribution of N in fluvial ecosystems, subsystem type and flowpaths are readily discernable guides, but they should be coupled with other mechanistic factors such as biota and soil type.

KW - Biogeochemistry

KW - Dissolved oxygen

KW - Ecosystem function

KW - Fluvial ecosystem

KW - Flux

KW - Heterogeneity

KW - Landscape

KW - Nitrogen

KW - Nutrient cycling

KW - Nutrient retention

KW - Southwest

KW - Stream

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249821373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249821373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10980-007-9078-6

DO - 10.1007/s10980-007-9078-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34249821373

VL - 22

SP - 911

EP - 924

JO - Landscape Ecology

JF - Landscape Ecology

SN - 0921-2973

IS - 6

ER -