Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: An example of climate-satisfaction relationships

Cheri Ostroff, Angelo J. Kinicki, Mark A. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

163 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two studies tested whether method variance is present at multiple levels of analysis and whether methodological procedures can minimize its impact. In Study 1, 8,052 employees from 71 hotels completed measures of climate, work environment characteristics, and satisfaction. A comparison of correlations at the individual level, cross-level, cross-level split, aggregate level, and aggregate-split level of analysis revealed that response bias was present across multiple levels. Results suggest that samples should be split in half when cross-level and aggregate correlations are computed to ameliorate response bias problems that arise from individual-level method variance. In Study 2, results indicated that the temporal spacing of measures of climate and satisfaction influenced response bias. Implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)355-368
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume87
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: An example of climate-satisfaction relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this