Abstract

The optimal strategy in detection theory is to partition the decision axis at a criterion C, labeling all events that score above C "Signal", and all those that fall below "Noise." The optimal position of C, C*, depends on signal probability and payoffs. If observers place their criterion at some place other than C*, they suffer a loss in the Expected Value (EV) of payoffs over the course of many decisions. We provide an explicit equation for the degree of loss, where it is shown that the falloff in value will be steep in contexts of good discrimination and will be a flatter gradient in contexts of poor discrimination. It is these gradients of loss in EV that, in theory, drive C toward C*, strongly when discrimination is good, weakly when discrimination is poor. When signal probabilities or distributions variances are unequal, the basins of attraction are asymmetric, so that dynamic adjustments in C will be asymmetric, and thus, as we show, will leave it biased. We address our analysis to acquisition speed, response variability, discrimination reversal and other aspects of discriminated performance. In the final section, we develop an error correction model that predicts empirically observed deviations from C* that are inconsistent with the standard model, but follow from the proposed model given knowledge of d=.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-130
Number of pages14
JournalPsychological Review
Volume125
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Noise

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Detectability
  • Error correction heuristic
  • Matchin
  • Signal detection theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Subjects adjust criterion on errors in perceptual decision tasks. / Killeen, Peter R.; Taylor, Thomas; Treviño, Mario.

In: Psychological Review, Vol. 125, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 117-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Killeen, Peter R. ; Taylor, Thomas ; Treviño, Mario. / Subjects adjust criterion on errors in perceptual decision tasks. In: Psychological Review. 2018 ; Vol. 125, No. 1. pp. 117-130.
@article{8ddf69900cc742c28008415da8084333,
title = "Subjects adjust criterion on errors in perceptual decision tasks",
abstract = "The optimal strategy in detection theory is to partition the decision axis at a criterion C, labeling all events that score above C {"}Signal{"}, and all those that fall below {"}Noise.{"} The optimal position of C, C*, depends on signal probability and payoffs. If observers place their criterion at some place other than C*, they suffer a loss in the Expected Value (EV) of payoffs over the course of many decisions. We provide an explicit equation for the degree of loss, where it is shown that the falloff in value will be steep in contexts of good discrimination and will be a flatter gradient in contexts of poor discrimination. It is these gradients of loss in EV that, in theory, drive C toward C*, strongly when discrimination is good, weakly when discrimination is poor. When signal probabilities or distributions variances are unequal, the basins of attraction are asymmetric, so that dynamic adjustments in C will be asymmetric, and thus, as we show, will leave it biased. We address our analysis to acquisition speed, response variability, discrimination reversal and other aspects of discriminated performance. In the final section, we develop an error correction model that predicts empirically observed deviations from C* that are inconsistent with the standard model, but follow from the proposed model given knowledge of d=.",
keywords = "Bias, Detectability, Error correction heuristic, Matchin, Signal detection theory",
author = "Killeen, {Peter R.} and Thomas Taylor and Mario Trevi{\~n}o",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/rev0000056",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "117--130",
journal = "Psychological Review",
issn = "0033-295X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subjects adjust criterion on errors in perceptual decision tasks

AU - Killeen, Peter R.

AU - Taylor, Thomas

AU - Treviño, Mario

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The optimal strategy in detection theory is to partition the decision axis at a criterion C, labeling all events that score above C "Signal", and all those that fall below "Noise." The optimal position of C, C*, depends on signal probability and payoffs. If observers place their criterion at some place other than C*, they suffer a loss in the Expected Value (EV) of payoffs over the course of many decisions. We provide an explicit equation for the degree of loss, where it is shown that the falloff in value will be steep in contexts of good discrimination and will be a flatter gradient in contexts of poor discrimination. It is these gradients of loss in EV that, in theory, drive C toward C*, strongly when discrimination is good, weakly when discrimination is poor. When signal probabilities or distributions variances are unequal, the basins of attraction are asymmetric, so that dynamic adjustments in C will be asymmetric, and thus, as we show, will leave it biased. We address our analysis to acquisition speed, response variability, discrimination reversal and other aspects of discriminated performance. In the final section, we develop an error correction model that predicts empirically observed deviations from C* that are inconsistent with the standard model, but follow from the proposed model given knowledge of d=.

AB - The optimal strategy in detection theory is to partition the decision axis at a criterion C, labeling all events that score above C "Signal", and all those that fall below "Noise." The optimal position of C, C*, depends on signal probability and payoffs. If observers place their criterion at some place other than C*, they suffer a loss in the Expected Value (EV) of payoffs over the course of many decisions. We provide an explicit equation for the degree of loss, where it is shown that the falloff in value will be steep in contexts of good discrimination and will be a flatter gradient in contexts of poor discrimination. It is these gradients of loss in EV that, in theory, drive C toward C*, strongly when discrimination is good, weakly when discrimination is poor. When signal probabilities or distributions variances are unequal, the basins of attraction are asymmetric, so that dynamic adjustments in C will be asymmetric, and thus, as we show, will leave it biased. We address our analysis to acquisition speed, response variability, discrimination reversal and other aspects of discriminated performance. In the final section, we develop an error correction model that predicts empirically observed deviations from C* that are inconsistent with the standard model, but follow from the proposed model given knowledge of d=.

KW - Bias

KW - Detectability

KW - Error correction heuristic

KW - Matchin

KW - Signal detection theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040700908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040700908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/rev0000056

DO - 10.1037/rev0000056

M3 - Article

C2 - 29345482

AN - SCOPUS:85040700908

VL - 125

SP - 117

EP - 130

JO - Psychological Review

JF - Psychological Review

SN - 0033-295X

IS - 1

ER -