Abstract

Research on ecosystem services (ES) has largely focused on the ecological functions that produce services or the economic valuation of the benefits provided by ecosystems. Far less research has examined public perceptions of ES, and more so ecosystem disservices (EDS), despite evidence that ecosystem properties and functions can produce beneficial or detrimental outcomes for human well-being. To address this gap, we present a robust approach to measuring beliefs about ecosystem services and disservices. With various means to confirm the validity and reliability of ES and EDS measures, we demonstrate this approach with survey data that captures residents’ perceptions about whether their local neighborhood environment (as the ecosystem of focus) provides certain positive or negative impacts in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. The results highlight patterns in people’s views of: Desirable and undesirable biota; benefits and risks pertaining to heat and stormwater; recreational and aesthetic values; and societal nuisances and problems. Composite survey scales for overall perceptions of services and disservices are presented, in addition to more distinctive dimensions of ES and EDS. To better understand and manage ecosystems for diverse benefits, the specific survey measures and the general methodological approach can be adapted to various ecosystems and contexts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7
JournalEcology and Society
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

ecosystem service
ecosystem
evaluation
esthetics
stormwater
valuation
biota
economics

Keywords

  • Ecosystem services and disservices
  • Environmental attitudes
  • Risk perceptions
  • Survey scales

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

@article{2dc30a21e1094f48b3074c511bb89a84,
title = "Subjective evaluations of ecosystem services and disservices: an approach to creating and analyzing robust survey scales",
abstract = "Research on ecosystem services (ES) has largely focused on the ecological functions that produce services or the economic valuation of the benefits provided by ecosystems. Far less research has examined public perceptions of ES, and more so ecosystem disservices (EDS), despite evidence that ecosystem properties and functions can produce beneficial or detrimental outcomes for human well-being. To address this gap, we present a robust approach to measuring beliefs about ecosystem services and disservices. With various means to confirm the validity and reliability of ES and EDS measures, we demonstrate this approach with survey data that captures residents’ perceptions about whether their local neighborhood environment (as the ecosystem of focus) provides certain positive or negative impacts in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. The results highlight patterns in people’s views of: Desirable and undesirable biota; benefits and risks pertaining to heat and stormwater; recreational and aesthetic values; and societal nuisances and problems. Composite survey scales for overall perceptions of services and disservices are presented, in addition to more distinctive dimensions of ES and EDS. To better understand and manage ecosystems for diverse benefits, the specific survey measures and the general methodological approach can be adapted to various ecosystems and contexts.",
keywords = "Ecosystem services and disservices, Environmental attitudes, Risk perceptions, Survey scales",
author = "Kelli Larson and Elizabeth Corley and Riley Andrade and Sharon Hall and Abigail York and Sara Meerow and Paul Coseo and Daniel Childers and David Hondula",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5751/ES-10888-240207",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subjective evaluations of ecosystem services and disservices

T2 - an approach to creating and analyzing robust survey scales

AU - Larson, Kelli

AU - Corley, Elizabeth

AU - Andrade, Riley

AU - Hall, Sharon

AU - York, Abigail

AU - Meerow, Sara

AU - Coseo, Paul

AU - Childers, Daniel

AU - Hondula, David

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Research on ecosystem services (ES) has largely focused on the ecological functions that produce services or the economic valuation of the benefits provided by ecosystems. Far less research has examined public perceptions of ES, and more so ecosystem disservices (EDS), despite evidence that ecosystem properties and functions can produce beneficial or detrimental outcomes for human well-being. To address this gap, we present a robust approach to measuring beliefs about ecosystem services and disservices. With various means to confirm the validity and reliability of ES and EDS measures, we demonstrate this approach with survey data that captures residents’ perceptions about whether their local neighborhood environment (as the ecosystem of focus) provides certain positive or negative impacts in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. The results highlight patterns in people’s views of: Desirable and undesirable biota; benefits and risks pertaining to heat and stormwater; recreational and aesthetic values; and societal nuisances and problems. Composite survey scales for overall perceptions of services and disservices are presented, in addition to more distinctive dimensions of ES and EDS. To better understand and manage ecosystems for diverse benefits, the specific survey measures and the general methodological approach can be adapted to various ecosystems and contexts.

AB - Research on ecosystem services (ES) has largely focused on the ecological functions that produce services or the economic valuation of the benefits provided by ecosystems. Far less research has examined public perceptions of ES, and more so ecosystem disservices (EDS), despite evidence that ecosystem properties and functions can produce beneficial or detrimental outcomes for human well-being. To address this gap, we present a robust approach to measuring beliefs about ecosystem services and disservices. With various means to confirm the validity and reliability of ES and EDS measures, we demonstrate this approach with survey data that captures residents’ perceptions about whether their local neighborhood environment (as the ecosystem of focus) provides certain positive or negative impacts in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. The results highlight patterns in people’s views of: Desirable and undesirable biota; benefits and risks pertaining to heat and stormwater; recreational and aesthetic values; and societal nuisances and problems. Composite survey scales for overall perceptions of services and disservices are presented, in addition to more distinctive dimensions of ES and EDS. To better understand and manage ecosystems for diverse benefits, the specific survey measures and the general methodological approach can be adapted to various ecosystems and contexts.

KW - Ecosystem services and disservices

KW - Environmental attitudes

KW - Risk perceptions

KW - Survey scales

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070881509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070881509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5751/ES-10888-240207

DO - 10.5751/ES-10888-240207

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070881509

VL - 24

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 2

M1 - 7

ER -