Studying language evolution in the age of big data

Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Nancy Retzlaff, Damián E. Blasi, William Croft, Michael Cysouw, Daniel Hruschka, Ian Maddieson, Lydia Müller, Eric Smith, Peter F. Stadler, George Starostin, Hyejin Youn

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The increasing availability of large digital corpora of cross-linguistic data is revolutionizing many branches of linguistics. Overall, it has triggered a shift of attention from detailed questions about individual features to more global patterns amenable to rigorous, but statistical, analyses. This engenders an approach based on successive approximations where models with simplified assumptions result in frameworks that can then be systematically refined, always keeping explicit the methodological commitments and the assumed prior knowledge. Therefore, they can resolve disputes between competing frameworks quantitatively by separating the support provided by the data from the underlying assumptions. These methods, though, often appear as a 'black box' to traditional practitioners. In fact, the switch to a statistical view complicates comparison of the results from these newer methods with traditional understanding, sometimes leading to misinterpretation and overly broad claims. We describe here this evolving methodological shift, attributed to the advent of big, but often incomplete and poorly curated data, emphasizing the underlying similarity of the newer quantitative to the traditional comparative methods and discussing when and to what extent the former have advantages over the latter. In this review, we cover briefly both randomization tests for detecting patterns in a largely model-independent fashion and phylolinguistic methods for a more model-based analysis of these patterns. We foresee a fruitful division of labor between the ability to computationally process large volumes of data and the trained linguistic insight identifying worthy prior commitments and interesting hypotheses in need of comparison.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-129
Number of pages36
JournalJournal of Language Evolution
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Language
Linguistics
language
linguistics
commitment
Aptitude
Dissent and Disputes
Random Allocation
division of labor
ability
knowledge

Keywords

  • Big data
  • Bioinformatics
  • Evolution
  • Language change
  • Language evolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Bhattacharya, T., Retzlaff, N., Blasi, D. E., Croft, W., Cysouw, M., Hruschka, D., ... Youn, H. (2018). Studying language evolution in the age of big data. Journal of Language Evolution, 3(2), 94-129. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzy004

Studying language evolution in the age of big data. / Bhattacharya, Tanmoy; Retzlaff, Nancy; Blasi, Damián E.; Croft, William; Cysouw, Michael; Hruschka, Daniel; Maddieson, Ian; Müller, Lydia; Smith, Eric; Stadler, Peter F.; Starostin, George; Youn, Hyejin.

In: Journal of Language Evolution, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.07.2018, p. 94-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Bhattacharya, T, Retzlaff, N, Blasi, DE, Croft, W, Cysouw, M, Hruschka, D, Maddieson, I, Müller, L, Smith, E, Stadler, PF, Starostin, G & Youn, H 2018, 'Studying language evolution in the age of big data', Journal of Language Evolution, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 94-129. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzy004
Bhattacharya T, Retzlaff N, Blasi DE, Croft W, Cysouw M, Hruschka D et al. Studying language evolution in the age of big data. Journal of Language Evolution. 2018 Jul 1;3(2):94-129. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzy004
Bhattacharya, Tanmoy ; Retzlaff, Nancy ; Blasi, Damián E. ; Croft, William ; Cysouw, Michael ; Hruschka, Daniel ; Maddieson, Ian ; Müller, Lydia ; Smith, Eric ; Stadler, Peter F. ; Starostin, George ; Youn, Hyejin. / Studying language evolution in the age of big data. In: Journal of Language Evolution. 2018 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 94-129.
@article{f788d85965b34eca96e5f17f8f117048,
title = "Studying language evolution in the age of big data",
abstract = "The increasing availability of large digital corpora of cross-linguistic data is revolutionizing many branches of linguistics. Overall, it has triggered a shift of attention from detailed questions about individual features to more global patterns amenable to rigorous, but statistical, analyses. This engenders an approach based on successive approximations where models with simplified assumptions result in frameworks that can then be systematically refined, always keeping explicit the methodological commitments and the assumed prior knowledge. Therefore, they can resolve disputes between competing frameworks quantitatively by separating the support provided by the data from the underlying assumptions. These methods, though, often appear as a 'black box' to traditional practitioners. In fact, the switch to a statistical view complicates comparison of the results from these newer methods with traditional understanding, sometimes leading to misinterpretation and overly broad claims. We describe here this evolving methodological shift, attributed to the advent of big, but often incomplete and poorly curated data, emphasizing the underlying similarity of the newer quantitative to the traditional comparative methods and discussing when and to what extent the former have advantages over the latter. In this review, we cover briefly both randomization tests for detecting patterns in a largely model-independent fashion and phylolinguistic methods for a more model-based analysis of these patterns. We foresee a fruitful division of labor between the ability to computationally process large volumes of data and the trained linguistic insight identifying worthy prior commitments and interesting hypotheses in need of comparison.",
keywords = "Big data, Bioinformatics, Evolution, Language change, Language evolution",
author = "Tanmoy Bhattacharya and Nancy Retzlaff and Blasi, {Dami{\'a}n E.} and William Croft and Michael Cysouw and Daniel Hruschka and Ian Maddieson and Lydia M{\"u}ller and Eric Smith and Stadler, {Peter F.} and George Starostin and Hyejin Youn",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jole/lzy004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "94--129",
journal = "Journal of Language Evolution",
issn = "2058-458X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Studying language evolution in the age of big data

AU - Bhattacharya, Tanmoy

AU - Retzlaff, Nancy

AU - Blasi, Damián E.

AU - Croft, William

AU - Cysouw, Michael

AU - Hruschka, Daniel

AU - Maddieson, Ian

AU - Müller, Lydia

AU - Smith, Eric

AU - Stadler, Peter F.

AU - Starostin, George

AU - Youn, Hyejin

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - The increasing availability of large digital corpora of cross-linguistic data is revolutionizing many branches of linguistics. Overall, it has triggered a shift of attention from detailed questions about individual features to more global patterns amenable to rigorous, but statistical, analyses. This engenders an approach based on successive approximations where models with simplified assumptions result in frameworks that can then be systematically refined, always keeping explicit the methodological commitments and the assumed prior knowledge. Therefore, they can resolve disputes between competing frameworks quantitatively by separating the support provided by the data from the underlying assumptions. These methods, though, often appear as a 'black box' to traditional practitioners. In fact, the switch to a statistical view complicates comparison of the results from these newer methods with traditional understanding, sometimes leading to misinterpretation and overly broad claims. We describe here this evolving methodological shift, attributed to the advent of big, but often incomplete and poorly curated data, emphasizing the underlying similarity of the newer quantitative to the traditional comparative methods and discussing when and to what extent the former have advantages over the latter. In this review, we cover briefly both randomization tests for detecting patterns in a largely model-independent fashion and phylolinguistic methods for a more model-based analysis of these patterns. We foresee a fruitful division of labor between the ability to computationally process large volumes of data and the trained linguistic insight identifying worthy prior commitments and interesting hypotheses in need of comparison.

AB - The increasing availability of large digital corpora of cross-linguistic data is revolutionizing many branches of linguistics. Overall, it has triggered a shift of attention from detailed questions about individual features to more global patterns amenable to rigorous, but statistical, analyses. This engenders an approach based on successive approximations where models with simplified assumptions result in frameworks that can then be systematically refined, always keeping explicit the methodological commitments and the assumed prior knowledge. Therefore, they can resolve disputes between competing frameworks quantitatively by separating the support provided by the data from the underlying assumptions. These methods, though, often appear as a 'black box' to traditional practitioners. In fact, the switch to a statistical view complicates comparison of the results from these newer methods with traditional understanding, sometimes leading to misinterpretation and overly broad claims. We describe here this evolving methodological shift, attributed to the advent of big, but often incomplete and poorly curated data, emphasizing the underlying similarity of the newer quantitative to the traditional comparative methods and discussing when and to what extent the former have advantages over the latter. In this review, we cover briefly both randomization tests for detecting patterns in a largely model-independent fashion and phylolinguistic methods for a more model-based analysis of these patterns. We foresee a fruitful division of labor between the ability to computationally process large volumes of data and the trained linguistic insight identifying worthy prior commitments and interesting hypotheses in need of comparison.

KW - Big data

KW - Bioinformatics

KW - Evolution

KW - Language change

KW - Language evolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048466770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048466770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jole/lzy004

DO - 10.1093/jole/lzy004

M3 - Review article

VL - 3

SP - 94

EP - 129

JO - Journal of Language Evolution

JF - Journal of Language Evolution

SN - 2058-458X

IS - 2

ER -