Studying inequality with one eye: A new agenda for evaluating disparate treatment in the courts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Over the last two decades, state and federal task forces have investigated reports of bias in the courts. Although overall the condition of the courts is positive, several jurisdictions have discovered instances of disrespectful treatment, disparate resources, and unequal sentencing patterns. With qualitative and perceptual data well examined, the challenge now is to understand if disparate treatment extends to case outcomes and, if it does, to explain why the disparities exist. This article sketches a new agenda for judicial research, presenting a methodology for quantitative inquiry and laying out the types of data that must be collected to evaluate disparate treatment in case outcomes. The article also discusses a recent pilot study in New Mexico and offers recommendations to courts to institutionalize assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-343
Number of pages27
JournalJustice System Journal
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Studying inequality with one eye: A new agenda for evaluating disparate treatment in the courts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this