Student learning in upper-level thermal physics

Comparisons and contrasts with students in introductory courses

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We found that students in an upper-level thermal physics course were in general quicker than introductory students at grasping and applying fundamental concepts. Upper-level students seemed, in general, more receptive to employing qualitative reasoning using multiple representations, and capable of using it more effectively than introductory students. In addition, upper-level students were better able to utilize guided-inquiry curricular materials in the sense of reasoning with greater depth and grasping more subtle issues. However, although the overall level of preparation and ability was higher in the upper-level course, the broad range of preparation represented among the students presented various practical challenges to implementing active-learning instructional strategies. Moreover, even quite capable upper-level students would falter unexpectedly and unpredictably on various conceptual difficulties that are common among introductory students. The unpredictable and inconsistent nature of this effect demonstrated that instructors must always be prepared to detect and address such difficulties in upper-level courses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAIP Conference Proceedings
Pages31-34
Number of pages4
Volume790
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 16 2005
Externally publishedYes
Event2004 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE - Sacramento, CA, United States
Duration: Aug 4 2004Aug 5 2004

Other

Other2004 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE
CountryUnited States
CitySacramento, CA
Period8/4/048/5/04

Fingerprint

students
learning
physics
preparation
instructors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Student learning in upper-level thermal physics : Comparisons and contrasts with students in introductory courses. / Meltzer, David.

AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 790 2005. p. 31-34.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Meltzer, D 2005, Student learning in upper-level thermal physics: Comparisons and contrasts with students in introductory courses. in AIP Conference Proceedings. vol. 790, pp. 31-34, 2004 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, Sacramento, CA, United States, 8/4/04. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2084694
@inproceedings{4b46241ba98d4a69835a3b3d1769ac09,
title = "Student learning in upper-level thermal physics: Comparisons and contrasts with students in introductory courses",
abstract = "We found that students in an upper-level thermal physics course were in general quicker than introductory students at grasping and applying fundamental concepts. Upper-level students seemed, in general, more receptive to employing qualitative reasoning using multiple representations, and capable of using it more effectively than introductory students. In addition, upper-level students were better able to utilize guided-inquiry curricular materials in the sense of reasoning with greater depth and grasping more subtle issues. However, although the overall level of preparation and ability was higher in the upper-level course, the broad range of preparation represented among the students presented various practical challenges to implementing active-learning instructional strategies. Moreover, even quite capable upper-level students would falter unexpectedly and unpredictably on various conceptual difficulties that are common among introductory students. The unpredictable and inconsistent nature of this effect demonstrated that instructors must always be prepared to detect and address such difficulties in upper-level courses.",
author = "David Meltzer",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1063/1.2084694",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0735402817",
volume = "790",
pages = "31--34",
booktitle = "AIP Conference Proceedings",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Student learning in upper-level thermal physics

T2 - Comparisons and contrasts with students in introductory courses

AU - Meltzer, David

PY - 2005/9/16

Y1 - 2005/9/16

N2 - We found that students in an upper-level thermal physics course were in general quicker than introductory students at grasping and applying fundamental concepts. Upper-level students seemed, in general, more receptive to employing qualitative reasoning using multiple representations, and capable of using it more effectively than introductory students. In addition, upper-level students were better able to utilize guided-inquiry curricular materials in the sense of reasoning with greater depth and grasping more subtle issues. However, although the overall level of preparation and ability was higher in the upper-level course, the broad range of preparation represented among the students presented various practical challenges to implementing active-learning instructional strategies. Moreover, even quite capable upper-level students would falter unexpectedly and unpredictably on various conceptual difficulties that are common among introductory students. The unpredictable and inconsistent nature of this effect demonstrated that instructors must always be prepared to detect and address such difficulties in upper-level courses.

AB - We found that students in an upper-level thermal physics course were in general quicker than introductory students at grasping and applying fundamental concepts. Upper-level students seemed, in general, more receptive to employing qualitative reasoning using multiple representations, and capable of using it more effectively than introductory students. In addition, upper-level students were better able to utilize guided-inquiry curricular materials in the sense of reasoning with greater depth and grasping more subtle issues. However, although the overall level of preparation and ability was higher in the upper-level course, the broad range of preparation represented among the students presented various practical challenges to implementing active-learning instructional strategies. Moreover, even quite capable upper-level students would falter unexpectedly and unpredictably on various conceptual difficulties that are common among introductory students. The unpredictable and inconsistent nature of this effect demonstrated that instructors must always be prepared to detect and address such difficulties in upper-level courses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746888437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746888437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.2084694

DO - 10.1063/1.2084694

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 0735402817

SN - 9780735402812

VL - 790

SP - 31

EP - 34

BT - AIP Conference Proceedings

ER -