Stuck between a rock and a hard place: Contrasting upward and downward effects of leaders' ingratiation

Ji Koung Kim, Jeffery LePine, Jae Uk Chun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research indicates that leaders who engage in upward ingratiation, a specific form of impression management, develop positive relationships with their bosses, which in turn enhances leaders' chances of achieving success at work. However, a more complete understanding of leaders' ingratiation requires recognition that leaders have multiple audiences and that there may be negative unintended consequences of this behavior to at least one of these audiences. Specifically, upward ingratiation may reduce subordinates' willingness to contribute to the organization through effective performance because it diminishes relationship quality between leaders and subordinates. To explore this issue, we develop and test a multilevel model that contrasts effects of leaders' upward ingratiation on leader- and subordinate-level outcomes through the quality of social exchange in the corresponding relationship. We test our predictions by conducting a multiwave, multisource field study with a sample of 91 leaders, 91 bosses, and 215 subordinates in South Korea. Our findings reveal that upward ingratiation is positively associated with indicators of leaders' intrinsic and extrinsic success because it enhances leader-boss exchange quality (LLX). In contrast, leaders' upward ingratiation negatively influences subordinates' job performance because it diminishes leader-subordinate exchange quality (LMX). We also find that subordinates' perceptions of leaders' political skill mitigate the negative indirect relationship between upward ingratiation and subordinates' job performance via LMX quality, and that our hypotheses apply to ingratiation but not to other forms of impression management. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings in relation to ingratiation specifically and to impression management more generally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPersonnel Psychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Republic of Korea
Research
Work Performance
Impression management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Stuck between a rock and a hard place : Contrasting upward and downward effects of leaders' ingratiation. / Kim, Ji Koung; LePine, Jeffery; Chun, Jae Uk.

In: Personnel Psychology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5ff9ee6a59214410bfa196bf12d0edd0,
title = "Stuck between a rock and a hard place: Contrasting upward and downward effects of leaders' ingratiation",
abstract = "Research indicates that leaders who engage in upward ingratiation, a specific form of impression management, develop positive relationships with their bosses, which in turn enhances leaders' chances of achieving success at work. However, a more complete understanding of leaders' ingratiation requires recognition that leaders have multiple audiences and that there may be negative unintended consequences of this behavior to at least one of these audiences. Specifically, upward ingratiation may reduce subordinates' willingness to contribute to the organization through effective performance because it diminishes relationship quality between leaders and subordinates. To explore this issue, we develop and test a multilevel model that contrasts effects of leaders' upward ingratiation on leader- and subordinate-level outcomes through the quality of social exchange in the corresponding relationship. We test our predictions by conducting a multiwave, multisource field study with a sample of 91 leaders, 91 bosses, and 215 subordinates in South Korea. Our findings reveal that upward ingratiation is positively associated with indicators of leaders' intrinsic and extrinsic success because it enhances leader-boss exchange quality (LLX). In contrast, leaders' upward ingratiation negatively influences subordinates' job performance because it diminishes leader-subordinate exchange quality (LMX). We also find that subordinates' perceptions of leaders' political skill mitigate the negative indirect relationship between upward ingratiation and subordinates' job performance via LMX quality, and that our hypotheses apply to ingratiation but not to other forms of impression management. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings in relation to ingratiation specifically and to impression management more generally.",
author = "Kim, {Ji Koung} and Jeffery LePine and Chun, {Jae Uk}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/peps.12267",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Personnel Psychology",
issn = "0031-5826",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stuck between a rock and a hard place

T2 - Contrasting upward and downward effects of leaders' ingratiation

AU - Kim, Ji Koung

AU - LePine, Jeffery

AU - Chun, Jae Uk

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Research indicates that leaders who engage in upward ingratiation, a specific form of impression management, develop positive relationships with their bosses, which in turn enhances leaders' chances of achieving success at work. However, a more complete understanding of leaders' ingratiation requires recognition that leaders have multiple audiences and that there may be negative unintended consequences of this behavior to at least one of these audiences. Specifically, upward ingratiation may reduce subordinates' willingness to contribute to the organization through effective performance because it diminishes relationship quality between leaders and subordinates. To explore this issue, we develop and test a multilevel model that contrasts effects of leaders' upward ingratiation on leader- and subordinate-level outcomes through the quality of social exchange in the corresponding relationship. We test our predictions by conducting a multiwave, multisource field study with a sample of 91 leaders, 91 bosses, and 215 subordinates in South Korea. Our findings reveal that upward ingratiation is positively associated with indicators of leaders' intrinsic and extrinsic success because it enhances leader-boss exchange quality (LLX). In contrast, leaders' upward ingratiation negatively influences subordinates' job performance because it diminishes leader-subordinate exchange quality (LMX). We also find that subordinates' perceptions of leaders' political skill mitigate the negative indirect relationship between upward ingratiation and subordinates' job performance via LMX quality, and that our hypotheses apply to ingratiation but not to other forms of impression management. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings in relation to ingratiation specifically and to impression management more generally.

AB - Research indicates that leaders who engage in upward ingratiation, a specific form of impression management, develop positive relationships with their bosses, which in turn enhances leaders' chances of achieving success at work. However, a more complete understanding of leaders' ingratiation requires recognition that leaders have multiple audiences and that there may be negative unintended consequences of this behavior to at least one of these audiences. Specifically, upward ingratiation may reduce subordinates' willingness to contribute to the organization through effective performance because it diminishes relationship quality between leaders and subordinates. To explore this issue, we develop and test a multilevel model that contrasts effects of leaders' upward ingratiation on leader- and subordinate-level outcomes through the quality of social exchange in the corresponding relationship. We test our predictions by conducting a multiwave, multisource field study with a sample of 91 leaders, 91 bosses, and 215 subordinates in South Korea. Our findings reveal that upward ingratiation is positively associated with indicators of leaders' intrinsic and extrinsic success because it enhances leader-boss exchange quality (LLX). In contrast, leaders' upward ingratiation negatively influences subordinates' job performance because it diminishes leader-subordinate exchange quality (LMX). We also find that subordinates' perceptions of leaders' political skill mitigate the negative indirect relationship between upward ingratiation and subordinates' job performance via LMX quality, and that our hypotheses apply to ingratiation but not to other forms of impression management. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings in relation to ingratiation specifically and to impression management more generally.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045712924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045712924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/peps.12267

DO - 10.1111/peps.12267

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045712924

JO - Personnel Psychology

JF - Personnel Psychology

SN - 0031-5826

ER -