Structural implications of reciprocal exchange

A power-dependence approach

Phillip Bonacich, Elisa Bienenstock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents and tests a general model to predict emergent exchange patterns and power differences in reciprocal exchange networks when individual actors follow the norm of reciprocity. With an interesting qualification, the experimental results reported here support the power-dependence approach (Emerson 1972a, b): those who acquire the most resources are connected to others who are dependent on them for rewards. Although, as Molm has abundantly demonstrated (1999, 2000, 2001, 2007), the quality of the relationship in negotiated and reciprocal exchange networks is quite different, and the details of a general model of network exchange might well differ for negotiated and reciprocal exchange, experimental results presented here indicate that power in networks, no matter how complex, is linked to dependence regardless of whether actors are motivated by rational choice or a norm of reciprocity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)226-240
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Psychology Quarterly
Volume72
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reward
Power (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Structural implications of reciprocal exchange : A power-dependence approach. / Bonacich, Phillip; Bienenstock, Elisa.

In: Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 72, No. 3, 01.09.2009, p. 226-240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{55ab32f308b1485a80e17afc9a11995f,
title = "Structural implications of reciprocal exchange: A power-dependence approach",
abstract = "This paper presents and tests a general model to predict emergent exchange patterns and power differences in reciprocal exchange networks when individual actors follow the norm of reciprocity. With an interesting qualification, the experimental results reported here support the power-dependence approach (Emerson 1972a, b): those who acquire the most resources are connected to others who are dependent on them for rewards. Although, as Molm has abundantly demonstrated (1999, 2000, 2001, 2007), the quality of the relationship in negotiated and reciprocal exchange networks is quite different, and the details of a general model of network exchange might well differ for negotiated and reciprocal exchange, experimental results presented here indicate that power in networks, no matter how complex, is linked to dependence regardless of whether actors are motivated by rational choice or a norm of reciprocity.",
author = "Phillip Bonacich and Elisa Bienenstock",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/019027250907200306",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "226--240",
journal = "Social Psychology Quarterly",
issn = "0190-2725",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural implications of reciprocal exchange

T2 - A power-dependence approach

AU - Bonacich, Phillip

AU - Bienenstock, Elisa

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - This paper presents and tests a general model to predict emergent exchange patterns and power differences in reciprocal exchange networks when individual actors follow the norm of reciprocity. With an interesting qualification, the experimental results reported here support the power-dependence approach (Emerson 1972a, b): those who acquire the most resources are connected to others who are dependent on them for rewards. Although, as Molm has abundantly demonstrated (1999, 2000, 2001, 2007), the quality of the relationship in negotiated and reciprocal exchange networks is quite different, and the details of a general model of network exchange might well differ for negotiated and reciprocal exchange, experimental results presented here indicate that power in networks, no matter how complex, is linked to dependence regardless of whether actors are motivated by rational choice or a norm of reciprocity.

AB - This paper presents and tests a general model to predict emergent exchange patterns and power differences in reciprocal exchange networks when individual actors follow the norm of reciprocity. With an interesting qualification, the experimental results reported here support the power-dependence approach (Emerson 1972a, b): those who acquire the most resources are connected to others who are dependent on them for rewards. Although, as Molm has abundantly demonstrated (1999, 2000, 2001, 2007), the quality of the relationship in negotiated and reciprocal exchange networks is quite different, and the details of a general model of network exchange might well differ for negotiated and reciprocal exchange, experimental results presented here indicate that power in networks, no matter how complex, is linked to dependence regardless of whether actors are motivated by rational choice or a norm of reciprocity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350716903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350716903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/019027250907200306

DO - 10.1177/019027250907200306

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 226

EP - 240

JO - Social Psychology Quarterly

JF - Social Psychology Quarterly

SN - 0190-2725

IS - 3

ER -