Structural equation modeling of users' response to wilderness recreation fees

Daniel R. Williams, Christine Vogt, Joar Vittersø

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines wilderness users' response to recently established overnight camping fees at the Desolation Wilderness in California. Fee program evaluations have typically focused on economic or revenue issues, distributional or equity impacts of various pricing strategies, and questions of price fairness. In the case of wilderness recreation fees, it is also important to recognize the complex public purpose of wilderness and the long history of not having access fees in wilderness. To evaluate these various factors, this paper examines the impact of past wilderness experience and residential proximity on response to wilderness use fees using data from the 1997 Desolation Wilderness Fees Study. The results suggest general support for wilderness use fees, but fees are judged to be less appropriate for wilderness than for more developed recreation facilities and services. Structural equation modeling shows that experienced wilderness users, experienced Desolation Wilderness users, and users residing in close proximity to the Desolation Wilderness are less supportive of fees and less likely to see positive benefits from fees. A history of paying fees for access to other recreation sites and perceptions of wilderness problems, though positively related to past wilderness experience, do not contribute to fee support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)245-268
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Leisure Research
Volume31
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

recreation
fee
modeling
Recreation
Structural equation modeling
Wilderness
Fees
rest home
camping
history
equity
fairness
pricing
revenue
experience

Keywords

  • Pricing
  • Recreation fees
  • Structural equation modeling
  • Wilderness
  • Wilderness experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Cite this

Structural equation modeling of users' response to wilderness recreation fees. / Williams, Daniel R.; Vogt, Christine; Vittersø, Joar.

In: Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, 1999, p. 245-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, Daniel R. ; Vogt, Christine ; Vittersø, Joar. / Structural equation modeling of users' response to wilderness recreation fees. In: Journal of Leisure Research. 1999 ; Vol. 31, No. 3. pp. 245-268.
@article{1cd72dd187864ce4aad83e12f67fd631,
title = "Structural equation modeling of users' response to wilderness recreation fees",
abstract = "This paper examines wilderness users' response to recently established overnight camping fees at the Desolation Wilderness in California. Fee program evaluations have typically focused on economic or revenue issues, distributional or equity impacts of various pricing strategies, and questions of price fairness. In the case of wilderness recreation fees, it is also important to recognize the complex public purpose of wilderness and the long history of not having access fees in wilderness. To evaluate these various factors, this paper examines the impact of past wilderness experience and residential proximity on response to wilderness use fees using data from the 1997 Desolation Wilderness Fees Study. The results suggest general support for wilderness use fees, but fees are judged to be less appropriate for wilderness than for more developed recreation facilities and services. Structural equation modeling shows that experienced wilderness users, experienced Desolation Wilderness users, and users residing in close proximity to the Desolation Wilderness are less supportive of fees and less likely to see positive benefits from fees. A history of paying fees for access to other recreation sites and perceptions of wilderness problems, though positively related to past wilderness experience, do not contribute to fee support.",
keywords = "Pricing, Recreation fees, Structural equation modeling, Wilderness, Wilderness experience",
author = "Williams, {Daniel R.} and Christine Vogt and Joar Vitters{\o}",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "245--268",
journal = "Journal of Leisure Research",
issn = "0022-2216",
publisher = "National Recreation and Park Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural equation modeling of users' response to wilderness recreation fees

AU - Williams, Daniel R.

AU - Vogt, Christine

AU - Vittersø, Joar

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - This paper examines wilderness users' response to recently established overnight camping fees at the Desolation Wilderness in California. Fee program evaluations have typically focused on economic or revenue issues, distributional or equity impacts of various pricing strategies, and questions of price fairness. In the case of wilderness recreation fees, it is also important to recognize the complex public purpose of wilderness and the long history of not having access fees in wilderness. To evaluate these various factors, this paper examines the impact of past wilderness experience and residential proximity on response to wilderness use fees using data from the 1997 Desolation Wilderness Fees Study. The results suggest general support for wilderness use fees, but fees are judged to be less appropriate for wilderness than for more developed recreation facilities and services. Structural equation modeling shows that experienced wilderness users, experienced Desolation Wilderness users, and users residing in close proximity to the Desolation Wilderness are less supportive of fees and less likely to see positive benefits from fees. A history of paying fees for access to other recreation sites and perceptions of wilderness problems, though positively related to past wilderness experience, do not contribute to fee support.

AB - This paper examines wilderness users' response to recently established overnight camping fees at the Desolation Wilderness in California. Fee program evaluations have typically focused on economic or revenue issues, distributional or equity impacts of various pricing strategies, and questions of price fairness. In the case of wilderness recreation fees, it is also important to recognize the complex public purpose of wilderness and the long history of not having access fees in wilderness. To evaluate these various factors, this paper examines the impact of past wilderness experience and residential proximity on response to wilderness use fees using data from the 1997 Desolation Wilderness Fees Study. The results suggest general support for wilderness use fees, but fees are judged to be less appropriate for wilderness than for more developed recreation facilities and services. Structural equation modeling shows that experienced wilderness users, experienced Desolation Wilderness users, and users residing in close proximity to the Desolation Wilderness are less supportive of fees and less likely to see positive benefits from fees. A history of paying fees for access to other recreation sites and perceptions of wilderness problems, though positively related to past wilderness experience, do not contribute to fee support.

KW - Pricing

KW - Recreation fees

KW - Structural equation modeling

KW - Wilderness

KW - Wilderness experience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001112524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001112524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 245

EP - 268

JO - Journal of Leisure Research

JF - Journal of Leisure Research

SN - 0022-2216

IS - 3

ER -