Strengthening associations: duration, attention, or relations?

Margaret M. Bradley, Arthur Glenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Associations formed between two words when subjects were induced to maintain the two words by overt Type I rehearsal in a secondary, incidental learning task. Duration of the rehearsal activity, however, failed to strengthen the association (improve memory for cooccurrence), despite use of transfer-appropriate recognition tests and sensitive paired-associate learning transfer tasks used to measure associative strength. In addition, varying the amount of cognitive capacity allocated to the rehearsal task also failed to produce evidence of increases in associative strength with longer durations of Type I rehearsal. These results disconfirmed a hypothesis suggesting that the automaticity of the rehearsal process was responsible for the lack of duration effects. The results are consistent with the idea that association formation is dependent upon processing a relation between two words, and that the strength of the association is a function of the number of different relations processed, rather than being solely dependent on either sheer duration of processing or the amount of cognitive capacity devoted to processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)650-666
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Paired-Associate Learning
Processing
Learning
learning
Data storage equipment
Transfer (Psychology)
Rehearsal
Strengthening
lack
evidence
Recognition (Psychology)
Associative Strength
Cognitive Capacity

Cite this

Strengthening associations : duration, attention, or relations? / Bradley, Margaret M.; Glenberg, Arthur.

In: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1983, p. 650-666.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd1088f66e8f4b84afcfa3523451b9e0,
title = "Strengthening associations: duration, attention, or relations?",
abstract = "Associations formed between two words when subjects were induced to maintain the two words by overt Type I rehearsal in a secondary, incidental learning task. Duration of the rehearsal activity, however, failed to strengthen the association (improve memory for cooccurrence), despite use of transfer-appropriate recognition tests and sensitive paired-associate learning transfer tasks used to measure associative strength. In addition, varying the amount of cognitive capacity allocated to the rehearsal task also failed to produce evidence of increases in associative strength with longer durations of Type I rehearsal. These results disconfirmed a hypothesis suggesting that the automaticity of the rehearsal process was responsible for the lack of duration effects. The results are consistent with the idea that association formation is dependent upon processing a relation between two words, and that the strength of the association is a function of the number of different relations processed, rather than being solely dependent on either sheer duration of processing or the amount of cognitive capacity devoted to processing.",
author = "Bradley, {Margaret M.} and Arthur Glenberg",
year = "1983",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90385-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "650--666",
journal = "Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strengthening associations

T2 - duration, attention, or relations?

AU - Bradley, Margaret M.

AU - Glenberg, Arthur

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - Associations formed between two words when subjects were induced to maintain the two words by overt Type I rehearsal in a secondary, incidental learning task. Duration of the rehearsal activity, however, failed to strengthen the association (improve memory for cooccurrence), despite use of transfer-appropriate recognition tests and sensitive paired-associate learning transfer tasks used to measure associative strength. In addition, varying the amount of cognitive capacity allocated to the rehearsal task also failed to produce evidence of increases in associative strength with longer durations of Type I rehearsal. These results disconfirmed a hypothesis suggesting that the automaticity of the rehearsal process was responsible for the lack of duration effects. The results are consistent with the idea that association formation is dependent upon processing a relation between two words, and that the strength of the association is a function of the number of different relations processed, rather than being solely dependent on either sheer duration of processing or the amount of cognitive capacity devoted to processing.

AB - Associations formed between two words when subjects were induced to maintain the two words by overt Type I rehearsal in a secondary, incidental learning task. Duration of the rehearsal activity, however, failed to strengthen the association (improve memory for cooccurrence), despite use of transfer-appropriate recognition tests and sensitive paired-associate learning transfer tasks used to measure associative strength. In addition, varying the amount of cognitive capacity allocated to the rehearsal task also failed to produce evidence of increases in associative strength with longer durations of Type I rehearsal. These results disconfirmed a hypothesis suggesting that the automaticity of the rehearsal process was responsible for the lack of duration effects. The results are consistent with the idea that association formation is dependent upon processing a relation between two words, and that the strength of the association is a function of the number of different relations processed, rather than being solely dependent on either sheer duration of processing or the amount of cognitive capacity devoted to processing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142127969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142127969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90385-7

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90385-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0142127969

VL - 22

SP - 650

EP - 666

JO - Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

JF - Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 6

ER -