Strategies in spatial reasoning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 3 experiments, 68 college students' strategies were studied in 2 logically related problems in spatial reasoning. The problems involved imagining the result of either an array rotating relative to a fixed viewer or a viewer rotating relative to a fixed array. Results show that Ss did not treat these logically equivalent problems in psychologically equivalent ways. The 2 problems differed in overall difficulty (both error level and latencies) and error patterns. Data suggest that Ss used literal, concrete strategies to solve the problems. For viewer rotation, Ss had trouble when the questions required a more abstract frame of reference. For array rotation, Ss could manipulate only one element at a time. This raises a question about the nature of the functional "unit" of spatial transformation. (13 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-251
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1982

Fingerprint

Students
Spatial Reasoning
Viewer
experiment
student
Frame of Reference
College Students
Imagining
Latency
Experiment
time

Keywords

  • array rotation vs viewer rotation, spatial reasoning, college students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Strategies in spatial reasoning. / Presson, Clark.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 8, No. 3, 05.1982, p. 243-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b628ade380d4167b851c84a179be2b3,
title = "Strategies in spatial reasoning",
abstract = "In 3 experiments, 68 college students' strategies were studied in 2 logically related problems in spatial reasoning. The problems involved imagining the result of either an array rotating relative to a fixed viewer or a viewer rotating relative to a fixed array. Results show that Ss did not treat these logically equivalent problems in psychologically equivalent ways. The 2 problems differed in overall difficulty (both error level and latencies) and error patterns. Data suggest that Ss used literal, concrete strategies to solve the problems. For viewer rotation, Ss had trouble when the questions required a more abstract frame of reference. For array rotation, Ss could manipulate only one element at a time. This raises a question about the nature of the functional {"}unit{"} of spatial transformation. (13 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "array rotation vs viewer rotation, spatial reasoning, college students",
author = "Clark Presson",
year = "1982",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/0278-7393.8.3.243",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "243--251",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategies in spatial reasoning

AU - Presson, Clark

PY - 1982/5

Y1 - 1982/5

N2 - In 3 experiments, 68 college students' strategies were studied in 2 logically related problems in spatial reasoning. The problems involved imagining the result of either an array rotating relative to a fixed viewer or a viewer rotating relative to a fixed array. Results show that Ss did not treat these logically equivalent problems in psychologically equivalent ways. The 2 problems differed in overall difficulty (both error level and latencies) and error patterns. Data suggest that Ss used literal, concrete strategies to solve the problems. For viewer rotation, Ss had trouble when the questions required a more abstract frame of reference. For array rotation, Ss could manipulate only one element at a time. This raises a question about the nature of the functional "unit" of spatial transformation. (13 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - In 3 experiments, 68 college students' strategies were studied in 2 logically related problems in spatial reasoning. The problems involved imagining the result of either an array rotating relative to a fixed viewer or a viewer rotating relative to a fixed array. Results show that Ss did not treat these logically equivalent problems in psychologically equivalent ways. The 2 problems differed in overall difficulty (both error level and latencies) and error patterns. Data suggest that Ss used literal, concrete strategies to solve the problems. For viewer rotation, Ss had trouble when the questions required a more abstract frame of reference. For array rotation, Ss could manipulate only one element at a time. This raises a question about the nature of the functional "unit" of spatial transformation. (13 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - array rotation vs viewer rotation, spatial reasoning, college students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001082334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001082334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0278-7393.8.3.243

DO - 10.1037/0278-7393.8.3.243

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001082334

VL - 8

SP - 243

EP - 251

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 3

ER -