Strategic citizenship

Negotiating Public Law 280 in Arizona, 1953-1968

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article analyzes how Arizona's Indigenous leaders responded to attempts by the Arizona legislature to impose the state's criminal and civil jurisdiction over Indian reservations under Public Law 280. Indigenous Arizonans' activism included requiring tribal consent to any jurisdictional changes, significant crosscultural cooperation in law enforcement, and insistence that non-Indian officials respect Indigenous methods of jurisprudence and learn from them. In each of these campaigns, Indigenous Arizonans articulated a vision of citizenship grounded in the opportunity to develop one's "full potential" as an American citizen. This language signaled a hybrid political identity: sovereign Indigenous peoples with a unique contribution to make to America, who as Arizonans were entitled to participate in post-World War II prosperity as equal citizens.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2-20
Number of pages19
JournalEthnohistory
Volume66
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

public law
citizenship
citizen
political identity
prosperity
law enforcement
jurisprudence
World War II
jurisdiction
respect
campaign
leader
language
Citizenship

Keywords

  • Arizona Commission on Indian Affairs
  • Consent of the governed
  • Indigenous jurisprudence
  • Public Law 280
  • Termination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Anthropology

Cite this

Strategic citizenship : Negotiating Public Law 280 in Arizona, 1953-1968. / Osburn, Katherine.

In: Ethnohistory, Vol. 66, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 2-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c2d1e9c4d44749cbbce9dfb1fe608581,
title = "Strategic citizenship: Negotiating Public Law 280 in Arizona, 1953-1968",
abstract = "This article analyzes how Arizona's Indigenous leaders responded to attempts by the Arizona legislature to impose the state's criminal and civil jurisdiction over Indian reservations under Public Law 280. Indigenous Arizonans' activism included requiring tribal consent to any jurisdictional changes, significant crosscultural cooperation in law enforcement, and insistence that non-Indian officials respect Indigenous methods of jurisprudence and learn from them. In each of these campaigns, Indigenous Arizonans articulated a vision of citizenship grounded in the opportunity to develop one's {"}full potential{"} as an American citizen. This language signaled a hybrid political identity: sovereign Indigenous peoples with a unique contribution to make to America, who as Arizonans were entitled to participate in post-World War II prosperity as equal citizens.",
keywords = "Arizona Commission on Indian Affairs, Consent of the governed, Indigenous jurisprudence, Public Law 280, Termination",
author = "Katherine Osburn",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1215/00141801-7217275",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "2--20",
journal = "Ethnohistory",
issn = "0014-1801",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategic citizenship

T2 - Negotiating Public Law 280 in Arizona, 1953-1968

AU - Osburn, Katherine

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This article analyzes how Arizona's Indigenous leaders responded to attempts by the Arizona legislature to impose the state's criminal and civil jurisdiction over Indian reservations under Public Law 280. Indigenous Arizonans' activism included requiring tribal consent to any jurisdictional changes, significant crosscultural cooperation in law enforcement, and insistence that non-Indian officials respect Indigenous methods of jurisprudence and learn from them. In each of these campaigns, Indigenous Arizonans articulated a vision of citizenship grounded in the opportunity to develop one's "full potential" as an American citizen. This language signaled a hybrid political identity: sovereign Indigenous peoples with a unique contribution to make to America, who as Arizonans were entitled to participate in post-World War II prosperity as equal citizens.

AB - This article analyzes how Arizona's Indigenous leaders responded to attempts by the Arizona legislature to impose the state's criminal and civil jurisdiction over Indian reservations under Public Law 280. Indigenous Arizonans' activism included requiring tribal consent to any jurisdictional changes, significant crosscultural cooperation in law enforcement, and insistence that non-Indian officials respect Indigenous methods of jurisprudence and learn from them. In each of these campaigns, Indigenous Arizonans articulated a vision of citizenship grounded in the opportunity to develop one's "full potential" as an American citizen. This language signaled a hybrid political identity: sovereign Indigenous peoples with a unique contribution to make to America, who as Arizonans were entitled to participate in post-World War II prosperity as equal citizens.

KW - Arizona Commission on Indian Affairs

KW - Consent of the governed

KW - Indigenous jurisprudence

KW - Public Law 280

KW - Termination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059564753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059564753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1215/00141801-7217275

DO - 10.1215/00141801-7217275

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 2

EP - 20

JO - Ethnohistory

JF - Ethnohistory

SN - 0014-1801

IS - 1

ER -