Stone soup MIMO radar: Comparing sparse partially adaptive and MIMO GMTI radars

Daniel Bliss, Keith W. Forsythe

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the advantages and limitations of coherent multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radars. This is a radar system in which the transmit and receive elements are in relative close proximity so that the target response is coherent between transmit and receive antenna pairings up to a known geometric effect. In particular, we compare the performance of MIMO radars that employ a pairing of sparse and filled arrays for receive and transmit with a system given the same geometry that employs a nonadaptive, coherent transmit array, which we denote a single-input multiple-output (SIMO) radar. We show that MIMO radar provides a noticeable improvement, particularly for ground moving target indicator (GMTI) radars. This improvement is for target detection and estimation performance for an ideal system. We also address the performance benefits of MIMO systems in the presence of radar calibration errors. In addition, we show that in addressing issues associated with a SIMO radar, a MIMO radar is constructed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationIEEE Radar Conference 2013
Subtitle of host publication"The Arctic - The New Frontier", RadarCon 2013
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013
Event2013 IEEE Radar Conference: "The Arctic - The New Frontier", RadarCon 2013 - Ottawa, ON, Canada
Duration: Apr 29 2013May 3 2013

Publication series

NameIEEE National Radar Conference - Proceedings
ISSN (Print)1097-5659

Other

Other2013 IEEE Radar Conference: "The Arctic - The New Frontier", RadarCon 2013
Country/TerritoryCanada
CityOttawa, ON
Period4/29/135/3/13

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stone soup MIMO radar: Comparing sparse partially adaptive and MIMO GMTI radars'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this