State party context and norms among delegates to the 2000 national party conventions

Thomas M. Carsey, John C. Green, Richard Herrera, Geoffrey C. Layman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Political scientists have increasingly viewed party activists as important catalysts for party behavior and change in American politics. Understanding the decisionmaking norms of these activists should help inform scholars' broader understanding of party performance. We examine the norms of party decisionmaking expressed by a select group of party activists: delegates to both parties' 2000 national conventions. We focus on how state contextual factors shape the norms these activists hold regarding the proper balance between ideological purity and the pragmatic pursuit of electoral success. The contextual factors we consider include the rules for delegate selection, the financial capacity of state parties, electoral competitiveness between the two parties, party polarization, and state political culture. We find evidence that norms respond as expected to some elements of state party context, but not to others.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-271
Number of pages25
JournalState Politics and Policy Quarterly
Volume6
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 2006

Fingerprint

party state
political scientist
political culture
polarization
competitiveness
pragmatics
politics
performance
evidence
Group
Activists
Contextual Factors
Decision Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

State party context and norms among delegates to the 2000 national party conventions. / Carsey, Thomas M.; Green, John C.; Herrera, Richard; Layman, Geoffrey C.

In: State Politics and Policy Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 3, 09.2006, p. 247-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carsey, Thomas M. ; Green, John C. ; Herrera, Richard ; Layman, Geoffrey C. / State party context and norms among delegates to the 2000 national party conventions. In: State Politics and Policy Quarterly. 2006 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 247-271.
@article{158026aa7b854081bedeea793cf3a1d3,
title = "State party context and norms among delegates to the 2000 national party conventions",
abstract = "Political scientists have increasingly viewed party activists as important catalysts for party behavior and change in American politics. Understanding the decisionmaking norms of these activists should help inform scholars' broader understanding of party performance. We examine the norms of party decisionmaking expressed by a select group of party activists: delegates to both parties' 2000 national conventions. We focus on how state contextual factors shape the norms these activists hold regarding the proper balance between ideological purity and the pragmatic pursuit of electoral success. The contextual factors we consider include the rules for delegate selection, the financial capacity of state parties, electoral competitiveness between the two parties, party polarization, and state political culture. We find evidence that norms respond as expected to some elements of state party context, but not to others.",
author = "Carsey, {Thomas M.} and Green, {John C.} and Richard Herrera and Layman, {Geoffrey C.}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "247--271",
journal = "State Politics and Policy Quarterly",
issn = "1532-4400",
publisher = "University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - State party context and norms among delegates to the 2000 national party conventions

AU - Carsey, Thomas M.

AU - Green, John C.

AU - Herrera, Richard

AU - Layman, Geoffrey C.

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - Political scientists have increasingly viewed party activists as important catalysts for party behavior and change in American politics. Understanding the decisionmaking norms of these activists should help inform scholars' broader understanding of party performance. We examine the norms of party decisionmaking expressed by a select group of party activists: delegates to both parties' 2000 national conventions. We focus on how state contextual factors shape the norms these activists hold regarding the proper balance between ideological purity and the pragmatic pursuit of electoral success. The contextual factors we consider include the rules for delegate selection, the financial capacity of state parties, electoral competitiveness between the two parties, party polarization, and state political culture. We find evidence that norms respond as expected to some elements of state party context, but not to others.

AB - Political scientists have increasingly viewed party activists as important catalysts for party behavior and change in American politics. Understanding the decisionmaking norms of these activists should help inform scholars' broader understanding of party performance. We examine the norms of party decisionmaking expressed by a select group of party activists: delegates to both parties' 2000 national conventions. We focus on how state contextual factors shape the norms these activists hold regarding the proper balance between ideological purity and the pragmatic pursuit of electoral success. The contextual factors we consider include the rules for delegate selection, the financial capacity of state parties, electoral competitiveness between the two parties, party polarization, and state political culture. We find evidence that norms respond as expected to some elements of state party context, but not to others.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748934781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748934781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33748934781

VL - 6

SP - 247

EP - 271

JO - State Politics and Policy Quarterly

JF - State Politics and Policy Quarterly

SN - 1532-4400

IS - 3

ER -