Stakeholder scrutiny, urban bias, and the private provision of public goods

Elizabeth Chrun, Daniel Berliner, Aseem Prakash

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While many scholars have studied urban bias in public policy, the potential for bias in the private provision of public goods has received little attention. Private certification is a mechanism encouraging private provision of environmental public goods. We show that within countries, there are often wide disparities in certification rates between firms located in urban and non-urban areas. However, these disparities can be mitigated if there is a countervailing force: scrutiny of firms' practices by key stakeholders. We suggest that the presence of strong civil society, independent media, a functioning state regulatory apparatus, and multinational owners can ameliorate the urban bias in certification uptakes. We test this argument with global, firm-level data covering over 40,000 firms in ninety-three countries. Our analyses suggest that an urban bias is mitigated when stakeholders - both public and private - have the freedom and capacity to scrutinize firms' activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-300
Number of pages28
JournalBusiness and Politics
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

private provision
stakeholder
firm
certification
trend
practice firm
civil society
public policy
Stakeholders
Urban bias
Certification

Keywords

  • environmental governance
  • information
  • private regulation
  • urban bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial relations
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Stakeholder scrutiny, urban bias, and the private provision of public goods. / Chrun, Elizabeth; Berliner, Daniel; Prakash, Aseem.

In: Business and Politics, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 273-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chrun, Elizabeth ; Berliner, Daniel ; Prakash, Aseem. / Stakeholder scrutiny, urban bias, and the private provision of public goods. In: Business and Politics. 2018 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 273-300.
@article{4041c6de9684485cb3aa03fe282b6a6f,
title = "Stakeholder scrutiny, urban bias, and the private provision of public goods",
abstract = "While many scholars have studied urban bias in public policy, the potential for bias in the private provision of public goods has received little attention. Private certification is a mechanism encouraging private provision of environmental public goods. We show that within countries, there are often wide disparities in certification rates between firms located in urban and non-urban areas. However, these disparities can be mitigated if there is a countervailing force: scrutiny of firms' practices by key stakeholders. We suggest that the presence of strong civil society, independent media, a functioning state regulatory apparatus, and multinational owners can ameliorate the urban bias in certification uptakes. We test this argument with global, firm-level data covering over 40,000 firms in ninety-three countries. Our analyses suggest that an urban bias is mitigated when stakeholders - both public and private - have the freedom and capacity to scrutinize firms' activities.",
keywords = "environmental governance, information, private regulation, urban bias",
author = "Elizabeth Chrun and Daniel Berliner and Aseem Prakash",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/bap.2017.33",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "273--300",
journal = "Business and Politics",
issn = "1469-3569",
publisher = "Berkeley Electronic Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder scrutiny, urban bias, and the private provision of public goods

AU - Chrun, Elizabeth

AU - Berliner, Daniel

AU - Prakash, Aseem

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - While many scholars have studied urban bias in public policy, the potential for bias in the private provision of public goods has received little attention. Private certification is a mechanism encouraging private provision of environmental public goods. We show that within countries, there are often wide disparities in certification rates between firms located in urban and non-urban areas. However, these disparities can be mitigated if there is a countervailing force: scrutiny of firms' practices by key stakeholders. We suggest that the presence of strong civil society, independent media, a functioning state regulatory apparatus, and multinational owners can ameliorate the urban bias in certification uptakes. We test this argument with global, firm-level data covering over 40,000 firms in ninety-three countries. Our analyses suggest that an urban bias is mitigated when stakeholders - both public and private - have the freedom and capacity to scrutinize firms' activities.

AB - While many scholars have studied urban bias in public policy, the potential for bias in the private provision of public goods has received little attention. Private certification is a mechanism encouraging private provision of environmental public goods. We show that within countries, there are often wide disparities in certification rates between firms located in urban and non-urban areas. However, these disparities can be mitigated if there is a countervailing force: scrutiny of firms' practices by key stakeholders. We suggest that the presence of strong civil society, independent media, a functioning state regulatory apparatus, and multinational owners can ameliorate the urban bias in certification uptakes. We test this argument with global, firm-level data covering over 40,000 firms in ninety-three countries. Our analyses suggest that an urban bias is mitigated when stakeholders - both public and private - have the freedom and capacity to scrutinize firms' activities.

KW - environmental governance

KW - information

KW - private regulation

KW - urban bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045199598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045199598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/bap.2017.33

DO - 10.1017/bap.2017.33

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045199598

VL - 20

SP - 273

EP - 300

JO - Business and Politics

JF - Business and Politics

SN - 1469-3569

IS - 2

ER -