Speckle Suppression by Decoherence in Fluctuation Electron Microscopy

Aram Rezikyan, Zechariah J. Jibben, Bryan A. Rock, Gongpu Zhao, Franz A M Koeck, Robert Nemanich, Michael Treacy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compare experimental fluctuation electron microscopy (FEM) speckle data with electron diffraction simulations for thin amorphous carbon and silicon samples. We find that the experimental speckle intensity variance is generally more than an order of magnitude lower than kinematical scattering theory predicts for spatially coherent illumination. We hypothesize that decoherence, which randomizes the phase relationship between scattered waves, is responsible for the anomaly. Specifically, displacement decoherence can contribute strongly to speckle suppression, particularly at higher beam energies. Displacement decoherence arises when the local structure is rearranged significantly by interactions with the beam during the exposure. Such motions cause diffraction speckle to twinkle, some of it at observable time scales. We also find that the continuous random network model of amorphous silicon can explain the experimental variance data if displacement decoherence and multiple scattering is included in the modeling. This may resolve the longstanding discrepancy between X-ray and electron diffraction studies of radial distribution functions, and conclusions reached from previous FEM studies. Decoherence likely affects all quantitative electron imaging and diffraction studies. It likely contributes to the so-called Stobbs factor, where high-resolution atomic-column image intensities are anomalously lower than predicted by a similar factor to that observed here.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1455-1474
Number of pages20
JournalMicroscopy and Microanalysis
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Speckle
Electron microscopy
electron microscopy
retarding
electron diffraction
Amorphous silicon
diffraction
Electron diffraction
Diffraction
scattering
radial distribution
amorphous silicon
Multiple scattering
Amorphous carbon
distribution functions
illumination
anomalies
Distribution functions
causes
Lighting

Keywords

  • amorphous materials
  • continuous random network
  • decoherence
  • Fluctuation electron microscopy
  • medium-range order

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Instrumentation

Cite this

Speckle Suppression by Decoherence in Fluctuation Electron Microscopy. / Rezikyan, Aram; Jibben, Zechariah J.; Rock, Bryan A.; Zhao, Gongpu; Koeck, Franz A M; Nemanich, Robert; Treacy, Michael.

In: Microscopy and Microanalysis, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2015, p. 1455-1474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rezikyan, Aram ; Jibben, Zechariah J. ; Rock, Bryan A. ; Zhao, Gongpu ; Koeck, Franz A M ; Nemanich, Robert ; Treacy, Michael. / Speckle Suppression by Decoherence in Fluctuation Electron Microscopy. In: Microscopy and Microanalysis. 2015 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 1455-1474.
@article{79e6ed82adb14d94ae392b12aaaac6b2,
title = "Speckle Suppression by Decoherence in Fluctuation Electron Microscopy",
abstract = "We compare experimental fluctuation electron microscopy (FEM) speckle data with electron diffraction simulations for thin amorphous carbon and silicon samples. We find that the experimental speckle intensity variance is generally more than an order of magnitude lower than kinematical scattering theory predicts for spatially coherent illumination. We hypothesize that decoherence, which randomizes the phase relationship between scattered waves, is responsible for the anomaly. Specifically, displacement decoherence can contribute strongly to speckle suppression, particularly at higher beam energies. Displacement decoherence arises when the local structure is rearranged significantly by interactions with the beam during the exposure. Such motions cause diffraction speckle to twinkle, some of it at observable time scales. We also find that the continuous random network model of amorphous silicon can explain the experimental variance data if displacement decoherence and multiple scattering is included in the modeling. This may resolve the longstanding discrepancy between X-ray and electron diffraction studies of radial distribution functions, and conclusions reached from previous FEM studies. Decoherence likely affects all quantitative electron imaging and diffraction studies. It likely contributes to the so-called Stobbs factor, where high-resolution atomic-column image intensities are anomalously lower than predicted by a similar factor to that observed here.",
keywords = "amorphous materials, continuous random network, decoherence, Fluctuation electron microscopy, medium-range order",
author = "Aram Rezikyan and Jibben, {Zechariah J.} and Rock, {Bryan A.} and Gongpu Zhao and Koeck, {Franz A M} and Robert Nemanich and Michael Treacy",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1017/S1431927615015135",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1455--1474",
journal = "Microscopy and Microanalysis",
issn = "1431-9276",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Speckle Suppression by Decoherence in Fluctuation Electron Microscopy

AU - Rezikyan, Aram

AU - Jibben, Zechariah J.

AU - Rock, Bryan A.

AU - Zhao, Gongpu

AU - Koeck, Franz A M

AU - Nemanich, Robert

AU - Treacy, Michael

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - We compare experimental fluctuation electron microscopy (FEM) speckle data with electron diffraction simulations for thin amorphous carbon and silicon samples. We find that the experimental speckle intensity variance is generally more than an order of magnitude lower than kinematical scattering theory predicts for spatially coherent illumination. We hypothesize that decoherence, which randomizes the phase relationship between scattered waves, is responsible for the anomaly. Specifically, displacement decoherence can contribute strongly to speckle suppression, particularly at higher beam energies. Displacement decoherence arises when the local structure is rearranged significantly by interactions with the beam during the exposure. Such motions cause diffraction speckle to twinkle, some of it at observable time scales. We also find that the continuous random network model of amorphous silicon can explain the experimental variance data if displacement decoherence and multiple scattering is included in the modeling. This may resolve the longstanding discrepancy between X-ray and electron diffraction studies of radial distribution functions, and conclusions reached from previous FEM studies. Decoherence likely affects all quantitative electron imaging and diffraction studies. It likely contributes to the so-called Stobbs factor, where high-resolution atomic-column image intensities are anomalously lower than predicted by a similar factor to that observed here.

AB - We compare experimental fluctuation electron microscopy (FEM) speckle data with electron diffraction simulations for thin amorphous carbon and silicon samples. We find that the experimental speckle intensity variance is generally more than an order of magnitude lower than kinematical scattering theory predicts for spatially coherent illumination. We hypothesize that decoherence, which randomizes the phase relationship between scattered waves, is responsible for the anomaly. Specifically, displacement decoherence can contribute strongly to speckle suppression, particularly at higher beam energies. Displacement decoherence arises when the local structure is rearranged significantly by interactions with the beam during the exposure. Such motions cause diffraction speckle to twinkle, some of it at observable time scales. We also find that the continuous random network model of amorphous silicon can explain the experimental variance data if displacement decoherence and multiple scattering is included in the modeling. This may resolve the longstanding discrepancy between X-ray and electron diffraction studies of radial distribution functions, and conclusions reached from previous FEM studies. Decoherence likely affects all quantitative electron imaging and diffraction studies. It likely contributes to the so-called Stobbs factor, where high-resolution atomic-column image intensities are anomalously lower than predicted by a similar factor to that observed here.

KW - amorphous materials

KW - continuous random network

KW - decoherence

KW - Fluctuation electron microscopy

KW - medium-range order

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994578260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994578260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1431927615015135

DO - 10.1017/S1431927615015135

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 1455

EP - 1474

JO - Microscopy and Microanalysis

JF - Microscopy and Microanalysis

SN - 1431-9276

IS - 6

ER -