Species prioritization for monitoring and management in regional multiple species conservation plans

Helen M. Regan, Lauren A. Hierl, Janet Franklin, Douglas H. Deutschman, Heather L. Schmalbach, Clark S. Winchell, Brenda S. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Successful conservation plans are not solely achieved by acquiring optimally designed reserves. Ongoing monitoring and management of the biodiversity in those reserves is an equally important, but often neglected or poorly executed, part of the conservation process. In this paper we address one of the first and most important steps in designing a monitoring program - deciding what to monitor. We present a strategy for prioritizing species for monitoring and management in multispecies conservation plans. We use existing assessments of threatened status, and the degree and spatial and temporal extent of known threats to link the prioritization of species to the overarching goals and objectives of the conservation plan. We consider both broad and localized spatial scales to capture the regional conservation context and the practicalities of local management and monitoring constraints. Spatial scales that are commensurate with available data are selected. We demonstrate the utility of this strategy through application to a set of 85 plants and animals in an established multispecies conservation plan in San Diego County, California, USA. We use the prioritization to identify the most prominent risk factors and the habitats associated with the most threats to species. The protocol highlighted priorities that had not previously been identified and were not necessarily intuitive without systematic application of the criteria; many high-priority species have received no monitoring attention to date, and lower-priority species have. We recommend that in the absence of clear focal species, monitoring threats in highly impacted habitats may be a way to circumvent the need to monitor all the targeted species.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)462-471
Number of pages10
JournalDiversity and Distributions
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

species conservation
prioritization
Ecosystem
monitoring
Biodiversity
habitat
plan
risk factor
habitats
biodiversity
risk factors
animal

Keywords

  • Endangered species
  • Focal species
  • Habitat Conservation Plans
  • Monitoring
  • Multispecies conservation
  • Natural Community Conservation Plans
  • Systematic conservation planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Ecology

Cite this

Regan, H. M., Hierl, L. A., Franklin, J., Deutschman, D. H., Schmalbach, H. L., Winchell, C. S., & Johnson, B. S. (2008). Species prioritization for monitoring and management in regional multiple species conservation plans. Diversity and Distributions, 14(3), 462-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00447.x

Species prioritization for monitoring and management in regional multiple species conservation plans. / Regan, Helen M.; Hierl, Lauren A.; Franklin, Janet; Deutschman, Douglas H.; Schmalbach, Heather L.; Winchell, Clark S.; Johnson, Brenda S.

In: Diversity and Distributions, Vol. 14, No. 3, 05.2008, p. 462-471.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Regan, HM, Hierl, LA, Franklin, J, Deutschman, DH, Schmalbach, HL, Winchell, CS & Johnson, BS 2008, 'Species prioritization for monitoring and management in regional multiple species conservation plans', Diversity and Distributions, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 462-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00447.x
Regan, Helen M. ; Hierl, Lauren A. ; Franklin, Janet ; Deutschman, Douglas H. ; Schmalbach, Heather L. ; Winchell, Clark S. ; Johnson, Brenda S. / Species prioritization for monitoring and management in regional multiple species conservation plans. In: Diversity and Distributions. 2008 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 462-471.
@article{73b2cd7df221439aa3a84fc3cab1189e,
title = "Species prioritization for monitoring and management in regional multiple species conservation plans",
abstract = "Successful conservation plans are not solely achieved by acquiring optimally designed reserves. Ongoing monitoring and management of the biodiversity in those reserves is an equally important, but often neglected or poorly executed, part of the conservation process. In this paper we address one of the first and most important steps in designing a monitoring program - deciding what to monitor. We present a strategy for prioritizing species for monitoring and management in multispecies conservation plans. We use existing assessments of threatened status, and the degree and spatial and temporal extent of known threats to link the prioritization of species to the overarching goals and objectives of the conservation plan. We consider both broad and localized spatial scales to capture the regional conservation context and the practicalities of local management and monitoring constraints. Spatial scales that are commensurate with available data are selected. We demonstrate the utility of this strategy through application to a set of 85 plants and animals in an established multispecies conservation plan in San Diego County, California, USA. We use the prioritization to identify the most prominent risk factors and the habitats associated with the most threats to species. The protocol highlighted priorities that had not previously been identified and were not necessarily intuitive without systematic application of the criteria; many high-priority species have received no monitoring attention to date, and lower-priority species have. We recommend that in the absence of clear focal species, monitoring threats in highly impacted habitats may be a way to circumvent the need to monitor all the targeted species.",
keywords = "Endangered species, Focal species, Habitat Conservation Plans, Monitoring, Multispecies conservation, Natural Community Conservation Plans, Systematic conservation planning",
author = "Regan, {Helen M.} and Hierl, {Lauren A.} and Janet Franklin and Deutschman, {Douglas H.} and Schmalbach, {Heather L.} and Winchell, {Clark S.} and Johnson, {Brenda S.}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00447.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "462--471",
journal = "Diversity and Distributions",
issn = "1366-9516",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Species prioritization for monitoring and management in regional multiple species conservation plans

AU - Regan, Helen M.

AU - Hierl, Lauren A.

AU - Franklin, Janet

AU - Deutschman, Douglas H.

AU - Schmalbach, Heather L.

AU - Winchell, Clark S.

AU - Johnson, Brenda S.

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Successful conservation plans are not solely achieved by acquiring optimally designed reserves. Ongoing monitoring and management of the biodiversity in those reserves is an equally important, but often neglected or poorly executed, part of the conservation process. In this paper we address one of the first and most important steps in designing a monitoring program - deciding what to monitor. We present a strategy for prioritizing species for monitoring and management in multispecies conservation plans. We use existing assessments of threatened status, and the degree and spatial and temporal extent of known threats to link the prioritization of species to the overarching goals and objectives of the conservation plan. We consider both broad and localized spatial scales to capture the regional conservation context and the practicalities of local management and monitoring constraints. Spatial scales that are commensurate with available data are selected. We demonstrate the utility of this strategy through application to a set of 85 plants and animals in an established multispecies conservation plan in San Diego County, California, USA. We use the prioritization to identify the most prominent risk factors and the habitats associated with the most threats to species. The protocol highlighted priorities that had not previously been identified and were not necessarily intuitive without systematic application of the criteria; many high-priority species have received no monitoring attention to date, and lower-priority species have. We recommend that in the absence of clear focal species, monitoring threats in highly impacted habitats may be a way to circumvent the need to monitor all the targeted species.

AB - Successful conservation plans are not solely achieved by acquiring optimally designed reserves. Ongoing monitoring and management of the biodiversity in those reserves is an equally important, but often neglected or poorly executed, part of the conservation process. In this paper we address one of the first and most important steps in designing a monitoring program - deciding what to monitor. We present a strategy for prioritizing species for monitoring and management in multispecies conservation plans. We use existing assessments of threatened status, and the degree and spatial and temporal extent of known threats to link the prioritization of species to the overarching goals and objectives of the conservation plan. We consider both broad and localized spatial scales to capture the regional conservation context and the practicalities of local management and monitoring constraints. Spatial scales that are commensurate with available data are selected. We demonstrate the utility of this strategy through application to a set of 85 plants and animals in an established multispecies conservation plan in San Diego County, California, USA. We use the prioritization to identify the most prominent risk factors and the habitats associated with the most threats to species. The protocol highlighted priorities that had not previously been identified and were not necessarily intuitive without systematic application of the criteria; many high-priority species have received no monitoring attention to date, and lower-priority species have. We recommend that in the absence of clear focal species, monitoring threats in highly impacted habitats may be a way to circumvent the need to monitor all the targeted species.

KW - Endangered species

KW - Focal species

KW - Habitat Conservation Plans

KW - Monitoring

KW - Multispecies conservation

KW - Natural Community Conservation Plans

KW - Systematic conservation planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42149119655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42149119655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00447.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00447.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:42149119655

VL - 14

SP - 462

EP - 471

JO - Diversity and Distributions

JF - Diversity and Distributions

SN - 1366-9516

IS - 3

ER -