Specialized subject-matter labels: Exodistinctive versus endoprofiling

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The present paper advances an argument that recent developments in the field of lexicography enable deployment of two types of specialized subject-matter labels: endoprofiling (for lexemes that are characteristic of a field, that lexically profile it, whether restricted to that particular field or also part of the general vocabulary) and exodistinctive (for lexemes generally not found outside the field - and thus a subset of those marked by the endoprofiling label). Only exodistinctive labels have been widely used in traditional lexicographic labeling and discussed in the metalexicographic literature; yet the current needs for human-user-interface dictionaries and machine-readable databases for natural language processing require that endoprofiling labels be consistently added to metalexicographic discussions and the underlying structure of some monolingual dictionary databases. This paper argues for the need to recognize both label types in theory and for a consistent two-pronged labeling strategy in practice: overt for exodistinctive and, in dictionaries with such need, underlying for endoprofiling labels. Relying on theory and case studies, the paper further points to problem areas in current deployment of subject-matter labels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-88
Number of pages59
JournalDictionaries
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

dictionary
Labels
Glossaries
user interface
vocabulary
Labeling
language
Subject Matter
Dictionary
Data Base
User interfaces
Processing
Natural Language Processing
General Vocabulary
User Interface
Lexicography
Monolingual Dictionary
literature

Keywords

  • Changes in lexicography
  • Human-user versus machine-readable dictionaries
  • Lexicographic strategies
  • Subject-matter marking
  • Usage labels

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication

Cite this

Specialized subject-matter labels : Exodistinctive versus endoprofiling. / Sipka, Danko.

In: Dictionaries, Vol. 38, No. 2, 01.01.2017, p. 30-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{bf88e4d07c5c491ab15ae6d66061af09,
title = "Specialized subject-matter labels: Exodistinctive versus endoprofiling",
abstract = "The present paper advances an argument that recent developments in the field of lexicography enable deployment of two types of specialized subject-matter labels: endoprofiling (for lexemes that are characteristic of a field, that lexically profile it, whether restricted to that particular field or also part of the general vocabulary) and exodistinctive (for lexemes generally not found outside the field - and thus a subset of those marked by the endoprofiling label). Only exodistinctive labels have been widely used in traditional lexicographic labeling and discussed in the metalexicographic literature; yet the current needs for human-user-interface dictionaries and machine-readable databases for natural language processing require that endoprofiling labels be consistently added to metalexicographic discussions and the underlying structure of some monolingual dictionary databases. This paper argues for the need to recognize both label types in theory and for a consistent two-pronged labeling strategy in practice: overt for exodistinctive and, in dictionaries with such need, underlying for endoprofiling labels. Relying on theory and case studies, the paper further points to problem areas in current deployment of subject-matter labels.",
keywords = "Changes in lexicography, Human-user versus machine-readable dictionaries, Lexicographic strategies, Subject-matter marking, Usage labels",
author = "Danko Sipka",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/dic.2017.0017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "30--88",
journal = "Dictionaries",
issn = "0197-6745",
publisher = "Dictionary Society of North America",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Specialized subject-matter labels

T2 - Exodistinctive versus endoprofiling

AU - Sipka, Danko

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The present paper advances an argument that recent developments in the field of lexicography enable deployment of two types of specialized subject-matter labels: endoprofiling (for lexemes that are characteristic of a field, that lexically profile it, whether restricted to that particular field or also part of the general vocabulary) and exodistinctive (for lexemes generally not found outside the field - and thus a subset of those marked by the endoprofiling label). Only exodistinctive labels have been widely used in traditional lexicographic labeling and discussed in the metalexicographic literature; yet the current needs for human-user-interface dictionaries and machine-readable databases for natural language processing require that endoprofiling labels be consistently added to metalexicographic discussions and the underlying structure of some monolingual dictionary databases. This paper argues for the need to recognize both label types in theory and for a consistent two-pronged labeling strategy in practice: overt for exodistinctive and, in dictionaries with such need, underlying for endoprofiling labels. Relying on theory and case studies, the paper further points to problem areas in current deployment of subject-matter labels.

AB - The present paper advances an argument that recent developments in the field of lexicography enable deployment of two types of specialized subject-matter labels: endoprofiling (for lexemes that are characteristic of a field, that lexically profile it, whether restricted to that particular field or also part of the general vocabulary) and exodistinctive (for lexemes generally not found outside the field - and thus a subset of those marked by the endoprofiling label). Only exodistinctive labels have been widely used in traditional lexicographic labeling and discussed in the metalexicographic literature; yet the current needs for human-user-interface dictionaries and machine-readable databases for natural language processing require that endoprofiling labels be consistently added to metalexicographic discussions and the underlying structure of some monolingual dictionary databases. This paper argues for the need to recognize both label types in theory and for a consistent two-pronged labeling strategy in practice: overt for exodistinctive and, in dictionaries with such need, underlying for endoprofiling labels. Relying on theory and case studies, the paper further points to problem areas in current deployment of subject-matter labels.

KW - Changes in lexicography

KW - Human-user versus machine-readable dictionaries

KW - Lexicographic strategies

KW - Subject-matter marking

KW - Usage labels

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038436429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038436429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/dic.2017.0017

DO - 10.1353/dic.2017.0017

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85038436429

VL - 38

SP - 30

EP - 88

JO - Dictionaries

JF - Dictionaries

SN - 0197-6745

IS - 2

ER -