Speaker Introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds: Forms of Address Reveal Gender Bias

Julia A. Files, Anita P. Mayer, Marcia G. Ko, Patricia Friedrich, Marjorie Jenkins, Michael J. Bryan, Suneela Vegunta, Christopher M. Wittich, Melissa A. Lyle, Ryan Melikian, Trevor Duston, Yu Hui H. Chang, Sharonne N. Hayes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Gender bias has been identified as one of the drivers of gender disparity in academic medicine. Bias may be reinforced by gender subordinating language or differential use of formality in forms of address. Professional titles may influence the perceived expertise and authority of the referenced individual. The objective of this study is to examine how professional titles were used in the same and mixed-gender speaker introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds (IMGR). Methods: A retrospective observational study of video-archived speaker introductions at consecutive IMGR was conducted at two different locations (Arizona, Minnesota) of an academic medical center. Introducers and speakers at IMGR were physician and scientist peers holding MD, PhD, or MD/PhD degrees. The primary outcome was whether or not a speaker's professional title was used during the first form of address during speaker introductions at IMGR. As secondary outcomes, we evaluated whether or not the speakers professional title was used in any form of address during the introduction. Results: Three hundred twenty-one forms of address were analyzed. Female introducers were more likely to use professional titles when introducing any speaker during the first form of address compared with male introducers (96.2% [102/106] vs. 65.6% [141/215]; p < 0.001). Female dyads utilized formal titles during the first form of address 97.8% (45/46) compared with male dyads who utilized a formal title 72.4% (110/152) of the time (p = 0.007). In mixed-gender dyads, where the introducer was female and speaker male, formal titles were used 95.0% (57/60) of the time. Male introducers of female speakers utilized professional titles 49.2% (31/63) of the time (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this study, women introduced by men at IMGR were less likely to be addressed by professional title than were men introduced by men. Differential formality in speaker introductions may amplify isolation, marginalization, and professional discomfiture expressed by women faculty in academic medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)413-419
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Women's Health
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Teaching Rounds
Sexism
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Observational Studies
Language
Retrospective Studies
Physicians

Keywords

  • academic medicine
  • gender disparity
  • stereotype
  • unconscious bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Speaker Introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds : Forms of Address Reveal Gender Bias. / Files, Julia A.; Mayer, Anita P.; Ko, Marcia G.; Friedrich, Patricia; Jenkins, Marjorie; Bryan, Michael J.; Vegunta, Suneela; Wittich, Christopher M.; Lyle, Melissa A.; Melikian, Ryan; Duston, Trevor; Chang, Yu Hui H.; Hayes, Sharonne N.

In: Journal of Women's Health, Vol. 26, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 413-419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Files, JA, Mayer, AP, Ko, MG, Friedrich, P, Jenkins, M, Bryan, MJ, Vegunta, S, Wittich, CM, Lyle, MA, Melikian, R, Duston, T, Chang, YHH & Hayes, SN 2017, 'Speaker Introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds: Forms of Address Reveal Gender Bias' Journal of Women's Health, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 413-419. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6044
Files, Julia A. ; Mayer, Anita P. ; Ko, Marcia G. ; Friedrich, Patricia ; Jenkins, Marjorie ; Bryan, Michael J. ; Vegunta, Suneela ; Wittich, Christopher M. ; Lyle, Melissa A. ; Melikian, Ryan ; Duston, Trevor ; Chang, Yu Hui H. ; Hayes, Sharonne N. / Speaker Introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds : Forms of Address Reveal Gender Bias. In: Journal of Women's Health. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 413-419.
@article{8f743ad2f1b4416090ff119882a691c7,
title = "Speaker Introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds: Forms of Address Reveal Gender Bias",
abstract = "Background: Gender bias has been identified as one of the drivers of gender disparity in academic medicine. Bias may be reinforced by gender subordinating language or differential use of formality in forms of address. Professional titles may influence the perceived expertise and authority of the referenced individual. The objective of this study is to examine how professional titles were used in the same and mixed-gender speaker introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds (IMGR). Methods: A retrospective observational study of video-archived speaker introductions at consecutive IMGR was conducted at two different locations (Arizona, Minnesota) of an academic medical center. Introducers and speakers at IMGR were physician and scientist peers holding MD, PhD, or MD/PhD degrees. The primary outcome was whether or not a speaker's professional title was used during the first form of address during speaker introductions at IMGR. As secondary outcomes, we evaluated whether or not the speakers professional title was used in any form of address during the introduction. Results: Three hundred twenty-one forms of address were analyzed. Female introducers were more likely to use professional titles when introducing any speaker during the first form of address compared with male introducers (96.2{\%} [102/106] vs. 65.6{\%} [141/215]; p < 0.001). Female dyads utilized formal titles during the first form of address 97.8{\%} (45/46) compared with male dyads who utilized a formal title 72.4{\%} (110/152) of the time (p = 0.007). In mixed-gender dyads, where the introducer was female and speaker male, formal titles were used 95.0{\%} (57/60) of the time. Male introducers of female speakers utilized professional titles 49.2{\%} (31/63) of the time (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this study, women introduced by men at IMGR were less likely to be addressed by professional title than were men introduced by men. Differential formality in speaker introductions may amplify isolation, marginalization, and professional discomfiture expressed by women faculty in academic medicine.",
keywords = "academic medicine, gender disparity, stereotype, unconscious bias",
author = "Files, {Julia A.} and Mayer, {Anita P.} and Ko, {Marcia G.} and Patricia Friedrich and Marjorie Jenkins and Bryan, {Michael J.} and Suneela Vegunta and Wittich, {Christopher M.} and Lyle, {Melissa A.} and Ryan Melikian and Trevor Duston and Chang, {Yu Hui H.} and Hayes, {Sharonne N.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jwh.2016.6044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "413--419",
journal = "Journal of Women's Health",
issn = "1540-9996",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Speaker Introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds

T2 - Forms of Address Reveal Gender Bias

AU - Files, Julia A.

AU - Mayer, Anita P.

AU - Ko, Marcia G.

AU - Friedrich, Patricia

AU - Jenkins, Marjorie

AU - Bryan, Michael J.

AU - Vegunta, Suneela

AU - Wittich, Christopher M.

AU - Lyle, Melissa A.

AU - Melikian, Ryan

AU - Duston, Trevor

AU - Chang, Yu Hui H.

AU - Hayes, Sharonne N.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Background: Gender bias has been identified as one of the drivers of gender disparity in academic medicine. Bias may be reinforced by gender subordinating language or differential use of formality in forms of address. Professional titles may influence the perceived expertise and authority of the referenced individual. The objective of this study is to examine how professional titles were used in the same and mixed-gender speaker introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds (IMGR). Methods: A retrospective observational study of video-archived speaker introductions at consecutive IMGR was conducted at two different locations (Arizona, Minnesota) of an academic medical center. Introducers and speakers at IMGR were physician and scientist peers holding MD, PhD, or MD/PhD degrees. The primary outcome was whether or not a speaker's professional title was used during the first form of address during speaker introductions at IMGR. As secondary outcomes, we evaluated whether or not the speakers professional title was used in any form of address during the introduction. Results: Three hundred twenty-one forms of address were analyzed. Female introducers were more likely to use professional titles when introducing any speaker during the first form of address compared with male introducers (96.2% [102/106] vs. 65.6% [141/215]; p < 0.001). Female dyads utilized formal titles during the first form of address 97.8% (45/46) compared with male dyads who utilized a formal title 72.4% (110/152) of the time (p = 0.007). In mixed-gender dyads, where the introducer was female and speaker male, formal titles were used 95.0% (57/60) of the time. Male introducers of female speakers utilized professional titles 49.2% (31/63) of the time (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this study, women introduced by men at IMGR were less likely to be addressed by professional title than were men introduced by men. Differential formality in speaker introductions may amplify isolation, marginalization, and professional discomfiture expressed by women faculty in academic medicine.

AB - Background: Gender bias has been identified as one of the drivers of gender disparity in academic medicine. Bias may be reinforced by gender subordinating language or differential use of formality in forms of address. Professional titles may influence the perceived expertise and authority of the referenced individual. The objective of this study is to examine how professional titles were used in the same and mixed-gender speaker introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds (IMGR). Methods: A retrospective observational study of video-archived speaker introductions at consecutive IMGR was conducted at two different locations (Arizona, Minnesota) of an academic medical center. Introducers and speakers at IMGR were physician and scientist peers holding MD, PhD, or MD/PhD degrees. The primary outcome was whether or not a speaker's professional title was used during the first form of address during speaker introductions at IMGR. As secondary outcomes, we evaluated whether or not the speakers professional title was used in any form of address during the introduction. Results: Three hundred twenty-one forms of address were analyzed. Female introducers were more likely to use professional titles when introducing any speaker during the first form of address compared with male introducers (96.2% [102/106] vs. 65.6% [141/215]; p < 0.001). Female dyads utilized formal titles during the first form of address 97.8% (45/46) compared with male dyads who utilized a formal title 72.4% (110/152) of the time (p = 0.007). In mixed-gender dyads, where the introducer was female and speaker male, formal titles were used 95.0% (57/60) of the time. Male introducers of female speakers utilized professional titles 49.2% (31/63) of the time (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this study, women introduced by men at IMGR were less likely to be addressed by professional title than were men introduced by men. Differential formality in speaker introductions may amplify isolation, marginalization, and professional discomfiture expressed by women faculty in academic medicine.

KW - academic medicine

KW - gender disparity

KW - stereotype

KW - unconscious bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019384117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019384117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jwh.2016.6044

DO - 10.1089/jwh.2016.6044

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 413

EP - 419

JO - Journal of Women's Health

JF - Journal of Women's Health

SN - 1540-9996

IS - 5

ER -