Spatial point pattern analysis of plants

Janet Franklin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Plants, especially terrestrial long-lived perennials such as trees, do not usually move once established. Spatial patterns of sessile organisms can suggest or reveal ecological processes affecting the population or community in the present or the past – dispersal, establishment, competition, mortality, facilitation, growth – and as such, patterns of plants motivated early developments in spatial statistics (Pielou, 1977; Diggle, 1983). Specifically, it is intuitive to treat individual plants (or other sessile organisms) as discrete events on a plane whose locations are known and generated by point pattern processes (Ripley, 1981; Diggle, 1983; Fortin and Dale, 2005). Second-order point pattern statistics are used to measure their spatial pattern. Arthur Getis (Getis and Franklin, 1987) introduced ecologists to the application of local spatial statistics, specifically neighborhood second-order point pattern analysis, to maps of organisms. As Wiegand and Moloney (2004) noted in their review paper, second-order global statistics based on the distribution of distances between pairs of points, especially Ripley’s K-function (Ripley, 1976, 1977) derived from distances between all pairs, have been widely used in plant ecology. However, their review does not mention neighborhood analysis or local measures of spatial association (Anselin, 1995) at all. This chapter revisits the impact of the Getis and Franklin paper on the practice of spatial point pattern analysis in plant ecology, and specifically aims to determine if local statistics are being used and how.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdvances in Spatial Science
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages113-123
Number of pages11
Volume61
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Publication series

NameAdvances in Spatial Science
Volume61
ISSN (Print)1430-9602
ISSN (Electronic)2197-9375

Fingerprint

statistics
ecology
facilitation
mortality
analysis
event
present
community
organism
Organism
Statistics
plant ecology
Ecology
Spatial statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Franklin, J. (2010). Spatial point pattern analysis of plants. In Advances in Spatial Science (Vol. 61, pp. 113-123). (Advances in Spatial Science; Vol. 61). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0_9

Spatial point pattern analysis of plants. / Franklin, Janet.

Advances in Spatial Science. Vol. 61 Springer International Publishing, 2010. p. 113-123 (Advances in Spatial Science; Vol. 61).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Franklin, J 2010, Spatial point pattern analysis of plants. in Advances in Spatial Science. vol. 61, Advances in Spatial Science, vol. 61, Springer International Publishing, pp. 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0_9
Franklin J. Spatial point pattern analysis of plants. In Advances in Spatial Science. Vol. 61. Springer International Publishing. 2010. p. 113-123. (Advances in Spatial Science). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0_9
Franklin, Janet. / Spatial point pattern analysis of plants. Advances in Spatial Science. Vol. 61 Springer International Publishing, 2010. pp. 113-123 (Advances in Spatial Science).
@inbook{1ecd4fffb84d4c40a26eb56b6035893a,
title = "Spatial point pattern analysis of plants",
abstract = "Plants, especially terrestrial long-lived perennials such as trees, do not usually move once established. Spatial patterns of sessile organisms can suggest or reveal ecological processes affecting the population or community in the present or the past – dispersal, establishment, competition, mortality, facilitation, growth – and as such, patterns of plants motivated early developments in spatial statistics (Pielou, 1977; Diggle, 1983). Specifically, it is intuitive to treat individual plants (or other sessile organisms) as discrete events on a plane whose locations are known and generated by point pattern processes (Ripley, 1981; Diggle, 1983; Fortin and Dale, 2005). Second-order point pattern statistics are used to measure their spatial pattern. Arthur Getis (Getis and Franklin, 1987) introduced ecologists to the application of local spatial statistics, specifically neighborhood second-order point pattern analysis, to maps of organisms. As Wiegand and Moloney (2004) noted in their review paper, second-order global statistics based on the distribution of distances between pairs of points, especially Ripley’s K-function (Ripley, 1976, 1977) derived from distances between all pairs, have been widely used in plant ecology. However, their review does not mention neighborhood analysis or local measures of spatial association (Anselin, 1995) at all. This chapter revisits the impact of the Getis and Franklin paper on the practice of spatial point pattern analysis in plant ecology, and specifically aims to determine if local statistics are being used and how.",
author = "Janet Franklin",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0_9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
series = "Advances in Spatial Science",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",
pages = "113--123",
booktitle = "Advances in Spatial Science",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Spatial point pattern analysis of plants

AU - Franklin, Janet

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Plants, especially terrestrial long-lived perennials such as trees, do not usually move once established. Spatial patterns of sessile organisms can suggest or reveal ecological processes affecting the population or community in the present or the past – dispersal, establishment, competition, mortality, facilitation, growth – and as such, patterns of plants motivated early developments in spatial statistics (Pielou, 1977; Diggle, 1983). Specifically, it is intuitive to treat individual plants (or other sessile organisms) as discrete events on a plane whose locations are known and generated by point pattern processes (Ripley, 1981; Diggle, 1983; Fortin and Dale, 2005). Second-order point pattern statistics are used to measure their spatial pattern. Arthur Getis (Getis and Franklin, 1987) introduced ecologists to the application of local spatial statistics, specifically neighborhood second-order point pattern analysis, to maps of organisms. As Wiegand and Moloney (2004) noted in their review paper, second-order global statistics based on the distribution of distances between pairs of points, especially Ripley’s K-function (Ripley, 1976, 1977) derived from distances between all pairs, have been widely used in plant ecology. However, their review does not mention neighborhood analysis or local measures of spatial association (Anselin, 1995) at all. This chapter revisits the impact of the Getis and Franklin paper on the practice of spatial point pattern analysis in plant ecology, and specifically aims to determine if local statistics are being used and how.

AB - Plants, especially terrestrial long-lived perennials such as trees, do not usually move once established. Spatial patterns of sessile organisms can suggest or reveal ecological processes affecting the population or community in the present or the past – dispersal, establishment, competition, mortality, facilitation, growth – and as such, patterns of plants motivated early developments in spatial statistics (Pielou, 1977; Diggle, 1983). Specifically, it is intuitive to treat individual plants (or other sessile organisms) as discrete events on a plane whose locations are known and generated by point pattern processes (Ripley, 1981; Diggle, 1983; Fortin and Dale, 2005). Second-order point pattern statistics are used to measure their spatial pattern. Arthur Getis (Getis and Franklin, 1987) introduced ecologists to the application of local spatial statistics, specifically neighborhood second-order point pattern analysis, to maps of organisms. As Wiegand and Moloney (2004) noted in their review paper, second-order global statistics based on the distribution of distances between pairs of points, especially Ripley’s K-function (Ripley, 1976, 1977) derived from distances between all pairs, have been widely used in plant ecology. However, their review does not mention neighborhood analysis or local measures of spatial association (Anselin, 1995) at all. This chapter revisits the impact of the Getis and Franklin paper on the practice of spatial point pattern analysis in plant ecology, and specifically aims to determine if local statistics are being used and how.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983737400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983737400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0_9

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0_9

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84983737400

VL - 61

T3 - Advances in Spatial Science

SP - 113

EP - 123

BT - Advances in Spatial Science

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -